On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 2:05 PM Paul B Mahol wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 7:43 PM Tristan Matthews
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 2:02 PM Paul B Mahol wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, Apr 9, 2022 at 9:21 PM Paul B Mahol wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > will apply soon
> > > >
> >
On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 7:43 PM Tristan Matthews
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 2:02 PM Paul B Mahol wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Apr 9, 2022 at 9:21 PM Paul B Mahol wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > will apply soon
> > >
> >
> >
> > Forgot to apply, will apply in next 24h.
> >
>
> Am I missing
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 2:02 PM Paul B Mahol wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 9, 2022 at 9:21 PM Paul B Mahol wrote:
>
> >
> > will apply soon
> >
>
>
> Forgot to apply, will apply in next 24h.
>
Am I missing something obvious or is there a default that's maybe not set?
Getting:
./ffmpeg_g -loglevel
On Sat, Apr 9, 2022 at 9:21 PM Paul B Mahol wrote:
>
> will apply soon
>
Forgot to apply, will apply in next 24h.
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link
will apply soon
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
Signed-off-by: Paul B Mahol
---
doc/filters.texi | 37
libavfilter/Makefile | 1 +
libavfilter/allfilters.c | 1 +
libavfilter/src_avsynctest.c | 401 +++
4 files changed, 440 insertions(+)
create mode 100644
On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 9:08 PM Nicolas George wrote:
> Paul B Mahol (12022-03-09):
> > Signed-off-by: Paul B Mahol
> > ---
> > libavfilter/Makefile | 1 +
> > libavfilter/allfilters.c | 1 +
> > libavfilter/src_avsynctest.c | 399 +++
> > 3
Paul B Mahol (12022-03-09):
> Signed-off-by: Paul B Mahol
> ---
> libavfilter/Makefile | 1 +
> libavfilter/allfilters.c | 1 +
> libavfilter/src_avsynctest.c | 399 +++
> 3 files changed, 401 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644
Signed-off-by: Paul B Mahol
---
libavfilter/Makefile | 1 +
libavfilter/allfilters.c | 1 +
libavfilter/src_avsynctest.c | 399 +++
3 files changed, 401 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 libavfilter/src_avsynctest.c
diff --git
Paul B Mahol (12020-03-12):
> I changed my mind, I will not follow Nicolas advice at all.
> Will apply this filter ASAP.
>
> I kindly ask Nicolas to stay away from my code for ever.
This is not how it works. Re-send the patch for consideration by the
whole project.
--
Nicolas George
On 8/23/17, Nicolas George wrote:
> Le sextidi 6 fructidor, an CCXXV, Paul B Mahol a écrit :
>> I was asked multiple times to implement this filter.
>
> I was not referring to the advice of single users with a tunnel vision
> of their own use case.
>
>> What framework? There is only framework for
Le sextidi 6 fructidor, an CCXXV, Paul B Mahol a écrit :
> I was asked multiple times to implement this filter.
I was not referring to the advice of single users with a tunnel vision
of their own use case.
> What framework? There is only framework for video source filter which
> outputs static
On 8/23/17, Nicolas George wrote:
> Le duodi 2 fructidor, an CCXXV, Paul B Mahol a écrit :
>> You completely ignored and removed other aspects of my reply.
>
> You still are being vague.
>
>> Something special, like one can control both audio and video aspect at
>> once and
Le duodi 2 fructidor, an CCXXV, Paul B Mahol a écrit :
> You completely ignored and removed other aspects of my reply.
You still are being vague.
> Something special, like one can control both audio and video aspect at
> once and provide same info to output.
On the usability / convenience
On 8/19/17, Nicolas George wrote:
> Le duodi 2 fructidor, an CCXXV, Paul B Mahol a écrit :
>> I like idea of having single A/V filter to do this job, not combinations
>> where
>> users might become confused.
>
> I do not agree. Adding yet another filter causes confusion in
Le duodi 2 fructidor, an CCXXV, Paul B Mahol a écrit :
> I like idea of having single A/V filter to do this job, not combinations where
> users might become confused.
I do not agree. Adding yet another filter causes confusion in itself.
Not counting the extra boilerplate code (I suggest you
On 8/19/17, Nicolas George wrote:
> Le duodi 2 fructidor, an CCXXV, Paul B Mahol a écrit :
>> That is not delay between blink and beep. But video timestamps.
>
> Since the beeps happen every second, the delay is the fractional part,
> or the remainder of the frame count divided
Le duodi 2 fructidor, an CCXXV, Paul B Mahol a écrit :
> That is not delay between blink and beep. But video timestamps.
Since the beeps happen every second, the delay is the fractional part,
or the remainder of the frame count divided by the frame rate. But if
you think this arithmetic is too
On 8/19/17, Nicolas George wrote:
> Le duodi 2 fructidor, an CCXXV, Paul B Mahol a écrit :
>> Sorry but where is that present? I nowhere can determine exact delay
>> in number of frames versus sine beep.
>
> In the upper-left corner, you have a microsecond timestamp and a frame
>
Le duodi 2 fructidor, an CCXXV, Paul B Mahol a écrit :
> Sorry but where is that present? I nowhere can determine exact delay
> in number of frames versus sine beep.
In the upper-left corner, you have a microsecond timestamp and a frame
counter.
> It is not sine but testsrc2 one that would need
On 8/19/17, Nicolas George wrote:
> Le duodi 2 fructidor, an CCXXV, Paul B Mahol a écrit :
>> Exact delay in number of frames and that converted to milliseconds.
>
> Already present. I asked you if you tested, obviously you did not.
Sorry but where is that present? I nowhere can
Le duodi 2 fructidor, an CCXXV, Paul B Mahol a écrit :
> Exact delay in number of frames and that converted to milliseconds.
Already present. I asked you if you tested, obviously you did not.
> Also one can not set custom delay between beep and blink.
I already mentioned that. You can propose a
On 8/19/17, Nicolas George wrote:
> Le duodi 2 fructidor, an CCXXV, Paul B Mahol a écrit :
>> How do you know when beep and blink should happen in your example?
>>
>> What is blink for testsrc2? Where in testsrc2 you can see delay in numeric
>> form?
>
> Have you tried? You have
Le duodi 2 fructidor, an CCXXV, Paul B Mahol a écrit :
> How do you know when beep and blink should happen in your example?
>
> What is blink for testsrc2? Where in testsrc2 you can see delay in numeric
> form?
Have you tried? You have a numeric timestamp and frame counter in the
upper left
On 8/19/17, Nicolas George wrote:
> Le duodi 2 fructidor, an CCXXV, Paul B Mahol a écrit :
>> And how would you show delay introduced with video source filter?
>> testsrc(2) does not show anything resembling that.
>
> I do not understand what you mean. The output of "ffmpeg
Le duodi 2 fructidor, an CCXXV, Paul B Mahol a écrit :
> And how would you show delay introduced with video source filter?
> testsrc(2) does not show anything resembling that.
I do not understand what you mean. The output of "ffmpeg -lavfi
'testsrc2;sine'" looks functionally identical to the
On 8/19/17, Nicolas George wrote:
> Le duodi 2 fructidor, an CCXXV, Paul B Mahol a écrit :
>> So it is. So unless you tell what exactly you mean I can not help you.
>
> My bad.
>
>> testsrc(2) are useless for lipsync testing, when one needs to know
>> exact time something is
Le duodi 2 fructidor, an CCXXV, Paul B Mahol a écrit :
> So it is. So unless you tell what exactly you mean I can not help you.
My bad.
> testsrc(2) are useless for lipsync testing, when one needs to know
> exact time something is played in wrong time.
Yes, testsrc alone is not enough. But you
On 8/19/17, Nicolas George wrote:
> Le duodi 2 fructidor, an CCXXV, Paul B Mahol a écrit :
>> Try harder to explain what you think.
>
> This "filter" has no input. All similar "filters" are called sources and
> implemented in files named accordingly.
So it is. So unless you tell
Le duodi 2 fructidor, an CCXXV, Paul B Mahol a écrit :
> Try harder to explain what you think.
This "filter" has no input. All similar "filters" are called sources and
implemented in files named accordingly.
> If you actually tried you would know.
I am sorry, but I do not accept that as an
On 8/19/17, Nicolas George wrote:
> Le nonidi 29 thermidor, an CCXXV, Paul B Mahol a écrit :
>> Hi,
>>
>> patch attached.
>
>> From 8d3876499b93e61ec1aec39adfc3c3be8d622464 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Paul B Mahol
>> Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 20:18:38 +0200
Le nonidi 29 thermidor, an CCXXV, Paul B Mahol a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> patch attached.
> From 8d3876499b93e61ec1aec39adfc3c3be8d622464 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Paul B Mahol
> Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 20:18:38 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] avfilter: add Audio Video Sync Test
On 8/17/17, Alex Giladi wrote:
> Hi Paul,
> Can you please point me to some information how this filter works?
> Best,
> Alex.
How to run:
mpv avdevice://lavfi:avsynctest[out1]
Are you interested in something else?
___
Hi Paul,
Can you please point me to some information how this filter works?
Best,
Alex.
On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 12:08 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> Hi,
>
> patch attached.
>
> ___
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
>
Hi,
patch attached.
0001-avfilter-add-Audio-Video-Sync-Test-filter.patch
Description: Binary data
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
35 matches
Mail list logo