2016-09-23 1:08 GMT+02:00 Paul B Mahol :
>> Log message changed locally to "lavf/mov: Read display
>> aspect ratio from ares atom also for dnxhd."
>
> LGTM
Patch applied.
Carl Eugen
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.or
On 9/20/16, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> 2016-09-19 14:57 GMT+02:00 Paul B Mahol :
>> On 9/19/16, Paul B Mahol wrote:
>
>>> Ignore that one above, patck with corrected text is ok.
>>
>> title should mentioned what kind of aspect ratio this is about. As I
>> thought it is about sar.
>
> Log message c
2016-09-19 14:57 GMT+02:00 Paul B Mahol :
> On 9/19/16, Paul B Mahol wrote:
>> Ignore that one above, patck with corrected text is ok.
>
> title should mentioned what kind of aspect ratio this is about. As I
> thought it is about sar.
Log message changed locally to "lavf/mov: Read display
aspect
2016-09-19 15:27 GMT+02:00 Paul B Mahol :
> On 9/19/16, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>> 2016-09-19 14:57 GMT+02:00 Paul B Mahol :
>>
>>> title should mentioned what kind of aspect ratio this is about.
>>> As I thought it is about sar.
>>
>> I don't understand: FFmpeg only knows about sample aspect
>> r
On 9/19/16, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> 2016-09-19 14:57 GMT+02:00 Paul B Mahol :
>
>> title should mentioned what kind of aspect ratio this is about.
>> As I thought it is about sar.
>
> I don't understand: FFmpeg only knows about sample aspect
> ratio (also known as pixel aspect ratio), display as
2016-09-19 14:57 GMT+02:00 Paul B Mahol :
> title should mentioned what kind of aspect ratio this is about.
> As I thought it is about sar.
I don't understand: FFmpeg only knows about sample aspect
ratio (also known as pixel aspect ratio), display aspect ratio is
only shown on the console for con
On 9/19/16, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> On 9/19/16, Paul B Mahol wrote:
>> On 9/19/16, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>>> 2016-09-19 14:02 GMT+02:00 Clement Boesch :
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 01:32:54PM +0200, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Attached patch fixes the aspect ratio for the samp
On 9/19/16, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> On 9/19/16, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>> 2016-09-19 14:02 GMT+02:00 Clement Boesch :
>>> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 01:32:54PM +0200, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Hi!
Attached patch fixes the aspect ratio for the sample from
ticket #5325 / #2125.
>
On 9/19/16, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> 2016-09-19 14:02 GMT+02:00 Clement Boesch :
>> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 01:32:54PM +0200, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> Attached patch fixes the aspect ratio for the sample from
>>> ticket #5325 / #2125.
>>>
>>> The fate test changes because the fate
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 02:04:43PM +0200, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> 2016-09-19 14:03 GMT+02:00 Clément Bœsch :
>
> >> > From the code of conduct: "Do not assume malice for things that can be
> >> > attributed to incompetence. Even if it is malice, it’s rarely good to
> >> > start with that as init
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 02:03:22PM +0200, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> 2016-09-19 14:02 GMT+02:00 Clément Bœsch :
> > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 01:32:54PM +0200, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >> Attached patch fixes the aspect ratio for the sample from
> >> ticket #5325 / #2125.
> >>
> >> The
2016-09-19 14:03 GMT+02:00 Clément Bœsch :
>> > From the code of conduct: "Do not assume malice for things that can be
>> > attributed to incompetence. Even if it is malice, it’s rarely good to
>> > start with that as initial assumption."
>>
>> I thought this is not relevant anymore?
>
> Why do yo
2016-09-19 14:02 GMT+02:00 Clément Bœsch :
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 01:32:54PM +0200, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> Attached patch fixes the aspect ratio for the sample from
>> ticket #5325 / #2125.
>>
>> The fate test changes because the fate sample was written
>> by FFmpeg with an incorr
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 02:01:17PM +0200, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> 2016-09-19 14:00 GMT+02:00 Clément Bœsch :
> > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 01:37:10PM +0200, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> >> On 9/19/16, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> >> > Hi!
> >> >
> >> > Attached patch fixes the aspect ratio for the sample fr
2016-09-19 14:00 GMT+02:00 Clément Bœsch :
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 01:37:10PM +0200, Paul B Mahol wrote:
>> On 9/19/16, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>> > Hi!
>> >
>> > Attached patch fixes the aspect ratio for the sample from
>> > ticket #5325 / #2125.
>> >
>> > The fate test changes because the fate
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 01:32:54PM +0200, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Attached patch fixes the aspect ratio for the sample from
> ticket #5325 / #2125.
>
> The fate test changes because the fate sample was written
> by FFmpeg with an incorrect aspect ratio.
>
> Please comment, Carl Euge
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 01:37:10PM +0200, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> On 9/19/16, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Attached patch fixes the aspect ratio for the sample from
> > ticket #5325 / #2125.
> >
> > The fate test changes because the fate sample was written
> > by FFmpeg with an incorrect
2016-09-19 13:57 GMT+02:00 Paul B Mahol :
> On 9/19/16, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>> 2016-09-19 13:37 GMT+02:00 Paul B Mahol :
>>> On 9/19/16, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Hi!
Attached patch fixes the aspect ratio for the sample from
ticket #5325 / #2125.
The fate test chan
On 9/19/16, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> 2016-09-19 13:37 GMT+02:00 Paul B Mahol :
>> On 9/19/16, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> Attached patch fixes the aspect ratio for the sample from
>>> ticket #5325 / #2125.
>>>
>>> The fate test changes because the fate sample was written
>>> by FFmp
2016-09-19 13:37 GMT+02:00 Paul B Mahol :
> On 9/19/16, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> Attached patch fixes the aspect ratio for the sample from
>> ticket #5325 / #2125.
>>
>> The fate test changes because the fate sample was written
>> by FFmpeg with an incorrect aspect ratio.
>>
>> Please
On 9/19/16, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Attached patch fixes the aspect ratio for the sample from
> ticket #5325 / #2125.
>
> The fate test changes because the fate sample was written
> by FFmpeg with an incorrect aspect ratio.
>
> Please comment, Carl Eugen
>
> From 0553b0adfee87401854f03
Hi!
Attached patch fixes the aspect ratio for the sample from
ticket #5325 / #2125.
The fate test changes because the fate sample was written
by FFmpeg with an incorrect aspect ratio.
Please comment, Carl Eugen
From 0553b0adfee87401854f0313dbcf386f2fb7ae68 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Carl
22 matches
Mail list logo