On 02/28/2016 12:22 AM, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 09:24:14PM +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 02/27/2016 09:21 PM, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 02/27/2016 08:42 PM, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
Well, then we know I can only blame Mats for "only" making it
better instead of perfect :)
On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 09:24:14PM +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:
> On 02/27/2016 09:21 PM, Mats Peterson wrote:
> >On 02/27/2016 08:42 PM, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
> >>Well, then we know I can only blame Mats for "only" making it
> >>better instead of perfect :)
> >>___
On 02/27/2016 09:33 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 08:42:25PM +0100, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 07:51:41PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
should rawvideo AVPackets palette use data[] or sidedata, honestly i
do not know, but i dont think it makes a
On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 08:42:25PM +0100, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 07:51:41PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > should rawvideo AVPackets palette use data[] or sidedata, honestly i
> > do not know, but i dont think it makes a big difference
> > even supporting both, lik
On 02/27/2016 09:21 PM, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 02/27/2016 08:42 PM, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 07:51:41PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
should rawvideo AVPackets palette use data[] or sidedata, honestly i
do not know, but i dont think it makes a big difference
even sup
On 02/27/2016 08:42 PM, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 07:51:41PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
should rawvideo AVPackets palette use data[] or sidedata, honestly i
do not know, but i dont think it makes a big difference
even supporting both, likely only adds 3-5 lines of co
On 02/27/2016 08:44 PM, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 07:52:52PM +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 02/27/2016 07:46 PM, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 07:40:44PM +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 02/27/2016 07:18 PM, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
That's not what e.g. th
On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 07:52:52PM +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:
> On 02/27/2016 07:46 PM, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
> >On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 07:40:44PM +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:
> >>On 02/27/2016 07:18 PM, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
> >>>That's not what e.g. the matroska demuxer produces, so stream
>
On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 07:51:41PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> should rawvideo AVPackets palette use data[] or sidedata, honestly i
> do not know, but i dont think it makes a big difference
> even supporting both, likely only adds 3-5 lines of code or so
> its more a philosophical question
On 02/27/2016 07:51 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 05:45:57PM +0100, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 04:15:10PM +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 02/27/2016 04:13 PM, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 02/27/2016 04:08 PM, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 02/27/2016 04:07 PM,
On 02/27/2016 07:46 PM, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 07:40:44PM +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 02/27/2016 07:18 PM, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
That's not what e.g. the matroska demuxer produces, so stream
copying with some generic remuxing example I am really sure that is
NOT ho
On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 05:45:57PM +0100, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 04:15:10PM +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:
> > On 02/27/2016 04:13 PM, Mats Peterson wrote:
> > >On 02/27/2016 04:08 PM, Mats Peterson wrote:
> > >>On 02/27/2016 04:07 PM, Mats Peterson wrote:
> > >>>On 02/27/20
On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 07:40:44PM +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:
> On 02/27/2016 07:18 PM, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
> >That's not what e.g. the matroska demuxer produces, so stream
> >copying with some generic remuxing example I am really sure that is
> >NOT how the packets come in.
> >
>
> Stream co
On 02/27/2016 07:40 PM, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 02/27/2016 07:18 PM, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
That's not what e.g. the matroska demuxer produces, so stream
copying with some generic remuxing example I am really sure that is
NOT how the packets come in.
Stream copying of raw palettized data sel
On 02/27/2016 07:18 PM, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
That's not what e.g. the matroska demuxer produces, so stream
copying with some generic remuxing example I am really sure that is
NOT how the packets come in.
Stream copying of raw palettized data seldom works well, due to
different strides of A
On 02/27/2016 07:18 PM, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 06:05:20PM +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 02/27/2016 05:45 PM, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
Not that it couldn't be done with side data packets, though.
If it doesn't support side data then the muxers are plain broken.
The m
On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 06:05:20PM +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:
> On 02/27/2016 05:45 PM, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
> >>Not that it couldn't be done with side data packets, though.
> >
> >If it doesn't support side data then the muxers are plain broken.
>
> The muxers should support side data, I agre
On 02/27/2016 05:45 PM, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
I agree that it should be stored in a side data packet myself normally,
and that this is a somewhat weird construction. It probably has to do
with the nut format originally, which stores raw palettized data after
the video data in the packets. Anywa
On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 04:15:10PM +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:
> On 02/27/2016 04:13 PM, Mats Peterson wrote:
> >On 02/27/2016 04:08 PM, Mats Peterson wrote:
> >>On 02/27/2016 04:07 PM, Mats Peterson wrote:
> >>>On 02/27/2016 04:00 PM, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 03:57:06P
On 02/27/2016 04:13 PM, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 02/27/2016 04:08 PM, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 02/27/2016 04:07 PM, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 02/27/2016 04:00 PM, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 03:57:06PM +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 02/27/2016 03:37 PM, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 02/27/2016 04:08 PM, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 02/27/2016 04:07 PM, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 02/27/2016 04:00 PM, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 03:57:06PM +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 02/27/2016 03:37 PM, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 02/27/2016 04:07 PM, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 02/27/2016 04:00 PM, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 03:57:06PM +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 02/27/2016 03:37 PM, Mats Peterson wrote:
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffm
On 02/27/2016 04:00 PM, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 03:57:06PM +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 02/27/2016 03:37 PM, Mats Peterson wrote:
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffm
On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 03:57:06PM +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:
> On 02/27/2016 03:37 PM, Mats Peterson wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >___
> >ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> >ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
> >http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
> >
>
> I suppose
On 02/27/2016 03:37 PM, Mats Peterson wrote:
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
I suppose this is what you mean, Reimar. Treating the palette, if a
packet contains one at the end
--
Mats Peterson
http://matsp888.no-ip.org/~mats/
>From 309ee0932eda48b340f2da9f2bc9ac3ea667edf9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mats Peterson
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 15:31:08 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] lavf/avienc: Simplify palette handling
---
libavformat/avienc.c |4 ++--
1 file changed,
26 matches
Mail list logo
