On 17.11.2016 21:34, James Almer wrote:
On 11/17/2016 5:11 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
2016-11-16 15:02 GMT+01:00 Michael Niedermayer :
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 12:15:28PM +0100, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Hi!
Attached patch improves output for some ffv1 files imo.
Current slowdown for the existi
Am 17.11.2016 22:16 schrieb "Paul B Mahol" :
>
> On 11/17/16, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 09:13:55PM +0100, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> >> 2016-11-17 14:49 GMT+01:00 Rostislav Pehlivanov :
> >> > On 16 November 2016 at 11:15, Carl Eugen Hoyos
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>
On 11/17/16, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 09:13:55PM +0100, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>> 2016-11-17 14:49 GMT+01:00 Rostislav Pehlivanov :
>> > On 16 November 2016 at 11:15, Carl Eugen Hoyos
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi!
>> >>
>> >> Attached patch improves output for some ffv1
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:11 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 09:13:55PM +0100, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> > 2016-11-17 14:49 GMT+01:00 Rostislav Pehlivanov :
> > > On 16 November 2016 at 11:15, Carl Eugen Hoyos
> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi!
> > >>
> > >> Attached patch i
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 09:13:55PM +0100, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> 2016-11-17 14:49 GMT+01:00 Rostislav Pehlivanov :
> > On 16 November 2016 at 11:15, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> >
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >> Attached patch improves output for some ffv1 files imo.
> >> Current slowdown for the existing deco
Hi Carl,
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos
wrote:
> 2016-11-17 19:34 GMT+01:00 Ronald S. Bultje :
> > Carl, the reason the patch is wrong is that luma range does not scale up
> > from 16< > This is documented in numerous places, see e.g.
> > https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/libra
On 11/17/2016 5:11 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> 2016-11-16 15:02 GMT+01:00 Michael Niedermayer :
>> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 12:15:28PM +0100, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> Attached patch improves output for some ffv1 files imo.
>>> Current slowdown for the existing decode-line timer is
>
On Thu, 17 Nov 2016 21:16:13 +0100
Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> 2016-11-17 0:49 GMT+01:00 Kieran Kunhya :
> >>
> >> It was lossless before and is lossless after the patch but it
> >> output the 16bit format that you don't like and of which you
> >> claim it breaks with find_best_pix_fmt() - I still
On Thu, 17 Nov 2016 21:10:34 +0100
Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> Hi!
>
> 2016-11-17 19:34 GMT+01:00 Ronald S. Bultje :
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 1:06 PM, Kieran Kunhya wrote:
>
> >> Furthermore I will be reverting this patch in two hours.
> >
> > There's no need to wait two hours, the pa
On Thu, 17 Nov 2016 21:06:33 +0100
Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> 2016-11-17 19:06 GMT+01:00 Kieran Kunhya :
> > On Thu, 17 Nov 2016 at 18:05 Kieran Kunhya wrote:
>
> > Furthermore I will be reverting this patch in two hours.
>
> Please do not revert a patch reviewed by the maintainer.
"probab
2016-11-16 15:02 GMT+01:00 Michael Niedermayer :
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 12:15:28PM +0100, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> Attached patch improves output for some ffv1 files imo.
>> Current slowdown for the existing decode-line timer is
>> 2%, I wonder if this can be improved through refacto
Hi!
2016-11-17 19:34 GMT+01:00 Ronald S. Bultje :
>
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 1:06 PM, Kieran Kunhya wrote:
>> Furthermore I will be reverting this patch in two hours.
>
> There's no need to wait two hours, the patch is fundamentally wrong.
This is not a helpful comment.
> Carl, the reason the
2016-11-17 0:49 GMT+01:00 Kieran Kunhya :
>>
>> It was lossless before and is lossless after the patch but it
>> output the 16bit format that you don't like and of which you
>> claim it breaks with find_best_pix_fmt() - I still believe this
>> should be trivial to fix.
>>
>> Currently white is gray
2016-11-17 14:49 GMT+01:00 Rostislav Pehlivanov :
> On 16 November 2016 at 11:15, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> Attached patch improves output for some ffv1 files imo.
>> Current slowdown for the existing decode-line timer is
>> 2%, I wonder if this can be improved through refactoring.
>>
2016-11-17 19:06 GMT+01:00 Kieran Kunhya :
> On Thu, 17 Nov 2016 at 18:05 Kieran Kunhya wrote:
> Furthermore I will be reverting this patch in two hours.
Please do not revert a patch reviewed by the maintainer.
Carl Eugen
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 1:06 PM, Kieran Kunhya wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Nov 2016 at 18:05 Kieran Kunhya wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 at 23:49 Kieran Kunhya wrote:
> >
> > It was lossless before and is lossless after the patch but it
> > output the 16bit format that you don't like and of whi
On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 at 23:49 Kieran Kunhya wrote:
> It was lossless before and is lossless after the patch but it
> output the 16bit format that you don't like and of which you
> claim it breaks with find_best_pix_fmt() - I still believe this
> should be trivial to fix.
>
> Currently white is gra
On Thu, 17 Nov 2016 at 18:05 Kieran Kunhya wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 at 23:49 Kieran Kunhya wrote:
>
> It was lossless before and is lossless after the patch but it
> output the 16bit format that you don't like and of which you
> claim it breaks with find_best_pix_fmt() - I still believe this
On 16 November 2016 at 11:15, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Attached patch improves output for some ffv1 files imo.
> Current slowdown for the existing decode-line timer is
> 2%, I wonder if this can be improved through refactoring.
>
> Please comment, Carl Eugen
>
> _
>
> It was lossless before and is lossless after the patch but it
> output the 16bit format that you don't like and of which you
> claim it breaks with find_best_pix_fmt() - I still believe this
> should be trivial to fix.
>
> Currently white is gray, the patch tries to fix this.
>
erm...in what w
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 12:15:28PM +0100, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Attached patch improves output for some ffv1 files imo.
> Current slowdown for the existing decode-line timer is
> 2%, I wonder if this can be improved through refactoring.
>
> Please comment, Carl Eugen
> ffv1dec.c |
2016-11-16 12:38 GMT+01:00 Hendrik Leppkes :
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> Attached patch improves output for some ffv1 files imo.
>> Current slowdown for the existing decode-line timer is
>> 2%, I wonder if this can be improved through refactoring.
>>
>>
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Attached patch improves output for some ffv1 files imo.
> Current slowdown for the existing decode-line timer is
> 2%, I wonder if this can be improved through refactoring.
>
> Please comment, Carl Eugen
>
Isn't ffv1 lossless? Ho
Hi!
Attached patch improves output for some ffv1 files imo.
Current slowdown for the existing decode-line timer is
2%, I wonder if this can be improved through refactoring.
Please comment, Carl Eugen
From e4e8277d4f0daeb9f61c2da9ebb167a084b1b93c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Carl Eugen Hoyos
D
24 matches
Mail list logo
