On 27/08/2020 19:13, Dale Curtis wrote:
> Bump to get this applied. Thanks!
Done.
- Derek
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-req
Bump to get this applied. Thanks!
- dale
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 6:13 AM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 02:04:04PM +0100, Derek Buitenhuis wrote:
> > On 18/08/2020 04:57, Dale Curtis wrote:
> > > Can't be an else statement since the prior clause modifies is_complete.
> >
>
On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 02:04:04PM +0100, Derek Buitenhuis wrote:
> On 18/08/2020 04:57, Dale Curtis wrote:
> > Can't be an else statement since the prior clause modifies is_complete.
>
> Ah, you're right.
>
> New version LGTM.
if someone applies this, please add a
"avformat/mov: " or equivalent
On 18/08/2020 04:57, Dale Curtis wrote:
> Can't be an else statement since the prior clause modifies is_complete.
Ah, you're right.
New version LGTM.
- Derek
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmp
On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 12:12 PM Derek Buitenhuis <
derek.buitenh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Patch lacks the context for stream_size here - will it always be
> correct? Only asking since the check for the coede below this will
> have changed from avio_size(pb) to stream_size.
>
stream_size == avio_si
On 13/08/2020 23:03, Dale Curtis wrote:
> A few popular sites have started generating MP4 files which have a
> sidx plus an mfra. The sidx accounts for all size except the mfra,
> so the old code did not mark the fragment index as complete.
>
> Instead we can just check if there's an mfra and if i
Bump. Thanks for consideration!
- dale
On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 3:03 PM Dale Curtis wrote:
> A few popular sites have started generating MP4 files which have a
> sidx plus an mfra. The sidx accounts for all size except the mfra,
> so the old code did not mark the fragment index as complete.
>
>
A few popular sites have started generating MP4 files which have a
sidx plus an mfra. The sidx accounts for all size except the mfra,
so the old code did not mark the fragment index as complete.
Instead we can just check if there's an mfra and if its size makes
up the difference we can mark the in
