On Monday, January 25, 2016, Andy Furniss wrote:
> Andy Furniss wrote:
>
>> Andy Furniss wrote:
>>
>>> Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>>>
Christian Johannesen gmail.com> writes:
ffmpeg.exe -r 3/1001 -i
> D:\media\test_720x486i_dotcrawl.mov
>
What I can see during encoding are a lot of these outputs;
[alsa @ 0x9194c0] ALSA buffer xrun. 1131kB time=00:00:03.16
bitrate=2922.2kbits/s dup=32 drop=0
[alsa @ 0x9194c0] ALSA buffer xrun. 2400kB time=00:00:05.34
bitrate=3674.8kbits/s dup=41 drop=0
[alsa @ 0x9194c0] ALSA buffer xrun. 2951kB
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 11:21:37 +0100, Karl Karpfen wrote:
> What I can see during encoding are a lot of these outputs;
Did you even read the mail you replied to?
This may be somewhat useful for analysis for someone who knows the
issue:
> [alsa @ 0x9194c0] ALSA buffer xrun. 1131kB
With reference to this post:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/30782771/what-does-past-duration-x-xxx-
too-large-mean
The problem seems to disappear if you set the input frame rate, i.e. use the
-r flag before your input definition, e.g.
ffmpeg -r 25 -i /dev/video0
As we know it is possible to detect field orders with ffmpeg:
ffmpeg -i -vf idet -f rawvideo -y NUL
Example Output:
[Parsed_idet_0 @ 003ea220] Single frame detection: TFF:0 BFF:153
Progressive:0 Undetermined:0
[Parsed_idet_0 @ 003ea220] Multi frame detection: TFF:0 BFF:153
Progressive:0
Hi Christoph,
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 11:36:54 +0100, Christoph Gerstbauer wrote:
> Is it possible to MARK the framenumbers to its detected field orders?
> Via framenumber or timestamp?
> Or to search a "known" TFF content for BFF frames? To force the output
> to lines like:
> Found BFF frames
Christoph Gerstbauer wrote:
As we know it is possible to detect field orders with ffmpeg:
ffmpeg -i -vf idet -f rawvideo -y NUL
Example Output:
[Parsed_idet_0 @ 003ea220] Single frame detection: TFF:0 BFF:153
Progressive:0 Undetermined:0 [Parsed_idet_0 @ 003ea220] Multi frame
detection:
On 1/26/16, G Alexander wrote:
> posting a log is not beneficial, you should be able to abstract the keys and
> associations without even seeing an output.
>
> eventually it turns out that the documentation is absolutely terrible.
> you're better off reading the header
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 22:10:17 -0800, Farid Zakaria wrote:
> I'll try to see in code where HTTP method type is hardcoded.
It seems there was once a proposal how to support the PUT method, but
it has never have gone into ffmpeg. (The attachments don't seem to be
in ffmpeg.org's archive, so I'm
i figured this out days ago.
Sent from somewhere in … The Twilight Zone
> On Jan 25, 2016, at 23:59, Moritz Barsnick wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 19:05:24 -0800, G A wrote:
>> what settings for x265 would you use to convert this old avi?
>
> I would always use the
On 1/26/16, Moritz Barsnick wrote:
> G Alexander, are you "G A"? Why do you change your name? Why does
> hotmail not properly reply to mails? (Why do you top-post?)
>
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 00:33:34 -0800, G Alexander wrote:
>
>> posting a log is not beneficial, you should be
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 18:42:27 -0800, G A wrote:
> -filter:a aresample=resampler=soxr
> -filter:a aresample=dither_method=shibata
>
> i’ve tried these separately and combined, nothing seems to work
>
> i get errors like Unable to find a suitable output format for
>
posting a log is not beneficial, you should be able to abstract the keys and
associations without even seeing an output.
eventually it turns out that the documentation is absolutely terrible. you’re
better off reading the header files like i did. the documentation is pitiful.
> Begin
G Alexander, are you "G A"? Why do you change your name? Why does
hotmail not properly reply to mails? (Why do you top-post?)
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 00:33:34 -0800, G Alexander wrote:
> posting a log is not beneficial, you should be able to abstract the
> keys and associations without even
On 2016-01-21, at 05:36, Nicolas George wrote:
> There is so much in the VOB files of a DVD image that anything can go wrong,
> especially with so-called anti-piracy measures. Full-fledged players have
> counter-measures, but not simple tools.
Yes, DVDs are a bit (too) complex. But in my present
After reminding my self recently just how bad ffmpeg yuv -> rgb can look
with interlaced (without using extra flags). I wanted to try something
else -
Is it possible via ffmpeg with libzimg to convert yuv -> rgb or is
zscale just for scaling and the Colorspace bits not implemented/need
some
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 15:43:45 +, Andy Furniss wrote:
> Is it possible via ffmpeg with libzimg to convert yuv -> rgb or is
> zscale just for scaling and the Colorspace bits not implemented/need
> some different filter?
From looking at the code, it seems to be implemented. (I don't use
Andy Furniss gmail.com> writes:
> After reminding my self recently just how bad ffmpeg yuv -> rgb
> can look with interlaced
Command line, complete, uncut console output and a sample missing.
> (without using extra flags).
Why is this an issue?
Carl Eugen
The website has some pretty clear documents on how to do it.
Just add --libx264 and make sure the shared libraries are in a default path
(or you can add to the LD_LIBRARY_PATH)
On 25 Jan 2016 10:21 p.m., "Rayden"
wrote:
> Is there anyone who could help in
Moritz Barsnick wrote:
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 15:43:45 +, Andy Furniss wrote:
Is it possible via ffmpeg with libzimg to convert yuv -> rgb or is
zscale just for scaling and the Colorspace bits not
implemented/need some different filter?
From looking at the code, it seems to be
On 1/26/16, Andy Furniss wrote:
> Moritz Barsnick wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 15:43:45 +, Andy Furniss wrote:
>>> Is it possible via ffmpeg with libzimg to convert yuv -> rgb or is
>>> zscale just for scaling and the Colorspace bits not
>>> implemented/need some
RE:https://www.ffmpeg.org/ffmpeg-filters.html#zoompan
Hi,
I have a 30 sec video in 1920x1080@25fps
I want to pan/crop with a constant rectangle of 1200x980
It rectangle starts at position (0,0) till t=10 sec
than from t=10 sec to t=20sec I wish my rectangle to move at a
constant/linear speed
Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Andy Furniss gmail.com> writes:
After reminding my self recently just how bad ffmpeg yuv -> rgb can
look with interlaced
Command line, complete, uncut console output and a sample missing.
It's too soon really I am still thinking about it but until I get more
time
On 1/26/16, Sub Phil wrote:
> RE:https://www.ffmpeg.org/ffmpeg-filters.html#zoompan
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a 30 sec video in 1920x1080@25fps
>
> I want to pan/crop with a constant rectangle of 1200x980
>
> It rectangle starts at position (0,0) till t=10 sec
> than from t=10 sec
> On 2016 Jan 19, at 7:52 PM, G A wrote:
>
> i probably made the mistake of installing x265 lib via homebrew, ugh, i’m
> transcoding some video
> and get this from the display
>
> x265 [info]: HEVC encoder version 1.8+1-5dcc9d3a928c400b
> x265 [info]: build info [Mac
Hi,
Forgive me if I'm not going through the proper protocol in contacting the
list users for this forum, I'm new to this site and to FFMPEG.
I was curious to know if you could please help me out.
I came across your thread on FFmpeg User. I see that it is dated roughly 3
years ago.
> On Jan 26, 2016, at 1:56 PM, Joe Volpe wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Forgive me if I'm not going through the proper protocol in contacting the
> list users for this forum, I'm new to this site and to FFMPEG.
> I was curious to know if you could please help me out.
>
> I came
Paul B Mahol wrote:
On 1/26/16, Andy Furniss wrote:
Maybe there is some way - or maybe not, I thought I would ask
before doing my usual ffmpeg game of trying many many
options/variants in the hope that eventually something will work
:-)
ffmpeg -i yuv -vf
Andy Furniss wrote:
Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Andy Furniss gmail.com> writes:
After reminding my self recently just how bad ffmpeg yuv -> rgb
can look with interlaced
Command line, complete, uncut console output and a sample missing.
It's too soon really I am still thinking about it but
On 1/26/16, Andy Furniss wrote:
> Paul B Mahol wrote:
>> On 1/26/16, Andy Furniss wrote:
>
>>> Maybe there is some way - or maybe not, I thought I would ask
>>> before doing my usual ffmpeg game of trying many many
>>> options/variants in the hope that
Paul B Mahol wrote:
On 1/26/16, Andy Furniss wrote:
Paul B Mahol wrote:
On 1/26/16, Andy Furniss wrote:
Maybe there is some way - or maybe not, I thought I would ask
before doing my usual ffmpeg game of trying many many
options/variants in the
Andy Furniss wrote:
Here's the assert - after seeing swscale in the first test I tried
format=rgb24 ...
ffmpeg -loglevel debug -i snk-422i-flags.y4m -vf zscale,format=rgb24
zimg-422.png
ffmpeg version N-78059-g2e31434 Copyright (c) 2000-2016 the FFmpeg
developers
built with gcc 5.3.0
On 1/26/16, Andy Furniss wrote:
> Andy Furniss wrote:
> Here's the assert - after seeing swscale in the first test I tried
> format=rgb24 ...
use copy filter before zscale filter.
Anyway using y4m is wrong as it doesnt have frame metadata as
primaries,matrix coefficients
Paul B Mahol wrote:
On 1/26/16, Andy Furniss wrote:
Andy Furniss wrote:
Here's the assert - after seeing swscale in the first test I tried
format=rgb24 ...
use copy filter before zscale filter.
Anyway using y4m is wrong as it doesnt have frame metadata as
liupin.2...@gmail.com
From: Andy Furniss
Date: 2016-01-27 02:34
To: ffmpeg-user
Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-user] zimg colorspace yuv -> rgb possible?
Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> Andy Furniss gmail.com> writes:
>
>> After reminding my self recently just how bad ffmpeg yuv -> rgb can
>> look with
According to http://ffmpeg.org/ffmpeg-filters.html#crop the expression
variables for t (time in seconds) and n (frame number) are available.
# X distance per frame = (400 - 0) / (10 * 25) = 1.6
# Y distance per frame = (10 - 0) / (10 * 25) = 0.04
I suspect you'll want something similar to the
Hi Everyone,
Good morning.
I would like to follow-up if there are other solutions I do based on the
logs and information I have provided? Thanks!
Regards,
Guillermo
On 1/15/2016 4:27 PM, Guillermo Martinez wrote:
Hi Carl,
Good afternoon.
Thank you very much for the reply.
On 1/13/2016
Christian Johannesen wrote:
On Monday, January 25, 2016, Andy Furniss
If you don't have access to better/"real" masters I don't think
you can get good results from this.
What produced this file with height 486?
The file was captured as 720x486 29.97 fps interlaced
38 matches
Mail list logo