[FFmpeg-user] Need help with mac uninstall

I am very novice and really got over my head with the code. I downloaded the binary file from http://www.ffmpegmac.net/ and clicked on ffmpeg ffprobe and ffserver files from the zip folder. My audio now does not work upon start up and the only way the built in audio

Re: [FFmpeg-user] libopus encoder produces bigger files than opusenc with 6-channel audio

Am 18.07.2016 um 18:51 schrieb Carl Eugen Hoyos: > Peter White posteo.net> writes: > >> So both programs autoselect 320 kbit/s as the nominal >> bitrate, yet opusenc produces a considerably smaller file. > > So you are reporting a bug in opusenc on our mailing list? I was merely checking if ther

Re: [FFmpeg-user] libopus encoder produces bigger files than opusenc with 6-channel audio

Am 18.07.2016 um 18:56 schrieb Carl Eugen Hoyos: > Peter White posteo.net> writes: > >> For 6-channel audio the "target" bitrate is 320 kbit/s >> in both applications. > > From a (very) quick look at the source, I don't think this > is correct but it doesn't matter because defaults may >

Re: [FFmpeg-user] libopus encoder produces bigger files than opusenc with 6-channel audio

Peter White posteo.net> writes: > For 6-channel audio the "target" bitrate is 320 kbit/s > in both applications. From a (very) quick look at the source, I don't think this is correct but it doesn't matter because defaults may change. Note that you should not assume FFmpeg plus external libra

Re: [FFmpeg-user] YUV10 Image Sequence

luke fazzary gmail.com> writes: > > Do these files work for you? > > ftp://vqeg.its.bldrdoc.gov/HDTV/SVT_exports/SVT_YUV10_Exports_/ > For my application I require YUV10 compliant files, which > requires the component order to be uyvy422 and 10-bit. Please test if the files in above directory

Re: [FFmpeg-user] libopus encoder produces bigger files than opusenc with 6-channel audio

Peter White posteo.net> writes: > So both programs autoselect 320 kbit/s as the nominal > bitrate, yet opusenc produces a considerably smaller file. So you are reporting a bug in opusenc on our mailing list? Sorry that I originally misunderstood your email: It is possible that FFmpeg tries to

[FFmpeg-user] Prevent FFMPEG from stopping on EOF

Hey, I am currently sending recordings made in the users browser to a server using Ajax. On the Server I have a ffmpeg process running (with the -re-option). The big issue here is however that the Encoding runs stable for two hours or so, then stops (due to the file not being filled on time, e.

Re: [FFmpeg-user] YUV10 Image Sequence

> > > > It seams that I cannot encode with v210x, only v210. v210x > > is listed by FFMPEG as decode only. > > Yes, sorry for missing this. > Do these files work for you? > ftp://vqeg.its.bldrdoc.gov/HDTV/SVT_exports/SVT_YUV10_Exports_/ > > -vcodec rawvideo -pix_fmt uyvy422 creates very different f

Re: [FFmpeg-user] libopus encoder produces bigger files than opusenc with 6-channel audio

Am 18.07.2016 14:40 schrieb Carl Eugen Hoyos: > Peter White posteo.net> writes: > >> And as far as I can tell, not providing any options should >> result in the same default setting and hence the same bitrate. > > No, this not correct. > > If you don't provide a bitrate (or constant quality) ffmp

Re: [FFmpeg-user] YUV10 Image Sequence

luke fazzary gmail.com> writes: > It seams that I cannot encode with v210x, only v210. v210x > is listed by FFMPEG as decode only. Yes, sorry for missing this. Do these files work for you? ftp://vqeg.its.bldrdoc.gov/HDTV/SVT_exports/SVT_YUV10_Exports_/ -vcodec rawvideo -pix_fmt uyvy422 create

Re: [FFmpeg-user] YUV10 Image Sequence

Thank you for the input! It seams that I cannot encode with v210x, only v210. v210x is listed by FFMPEG as decode only. I was able to get my files to work using: ffmpeg -i inputfile -video_size 3840x2160 -vcodec rawvideo -pix_fmt uyvy422 ouputfile However, the yuv10 files are 8-bit. the key i

Re: [FFmpeg-user] libopus encoder produces bigger files than opusenc with 6-channel audio

Peter White posteo.net> writes: > And as far as I can tell, not providing any options should > result in the same default setting and hence the same bitrate. No, this not correct. If you don't provide a bitrate (or constant quality) ffmpeg will choose one that may or may not suite you. Carl E