On 16.06.2024 15:56, Carl Zwanzig wrote:
On 6/16/2024 2:33 AM, Binarus wrote:
to solve your problem.
... for the same reasons that annoy you
However, your behavior ... Do you really ...to communicate with you
I strongly advise you to
- You do not have
etc
We only find out who
> On 17 Jun 2024, at 08:26, Binarus wrote:
>
> On 16.06.2024 15:58, Bouke / edit 'B wrote:
>> Do not feed trolls.
>
> Do you mean me?
Of course not!
>
> Then please show where you think I have behaved like a troll. Since I have
> begun using the internet three decades ago, I always have
On 16.06.2024 15:58, Bouke / edit 'B wrote:
Do not feed trolls.
Do you mean me?
Then please show where you think I have behaved like a troll. Since I have
begun using the internet three decades ago, I always have tried to behave as
polite and honestly as possible, and while surely not every
To expand on my idea:
The video is this:
I P B B P B B P B B I P B B..
I want to change it to this:
I B B P B B P B B P I B B P..
To do that, I reckon I need to,
1, move the packets that contain P-frames,
2, insert revised 'program_clock_reference_base's and 'program_clock_reference_extension's
I had a brainwave...
The 4 second video is in DTS-order. That's unusual, but that's what Criterion
gave us.
What if I could rearrange the packets to PTS-order?
If showinfo and show_frames then agreed with framecrc, that would tell the
whole story, wouldn't it?
Is that possible? Is it possible t
On 16/06/2024 19.25, Jim DeLaHunt wrote:
On 2024-06-16 01:19, Mark Filipak wrote:
On 16/06/2024 03.51, Jim DeLaHunt wrote:
On 2024-06-15 23:04, Mark Filipak wrote:
On 15/06/2024 23.39, Jim DeLaHunt wrote:
On 2024-06-15 19:27, Mark Filipak wrote:
It would be nice if folks from here went here
On 2024-06-16 01:19, Mark Filipak wrote:
On 16/06/2024 03.51, Jim DeLaHunt wrote:
On 2024-06-15 23:04, Mark Filipak wrote:
On 15/06/2024 23.39, Jim DeLaHunt wrote:
On 2024-06-15 19:27, Mark Filipak wrote:
It would be nice if folks from here went here:
https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/11055
and
Hello,
I have been trying to encode video sent over SRT as ABR HLS. This works
fine while the stream is running but once the sender stops sending
(stopping normally or killing the process makes no difference) ffmpeg
keeps encoding new segments containing just the last frame as fast as
the CPU
On Sun, Jun 16, 2024 at 8:03 PM Bouke / Videotoolshed <
bo...@videotoolshed.com> wrote:
> Hi Harald,
> As a professional, my time is worth something.
> How much does it cost never to be bothered by you again?
> It is not helpfull, nor joy, nor constructive, only a major PITA.
> So, please, name yo
Hi Harald,
As a professional, my time is worth something.
How much does it cost never to be bothered by you again?
It is not helpfull, nor joy, nor constructive, only a major PITA.
So, please, name your price!
Bouke
videotoolshed.com
Van Oldenbarneveltstraat 33
6512 AS Nijmegen, the Netherlands
Am 16.06.24 um 15:54 schrieb Phil Rhodes via ffmpeg-user:
On Sunday 16 June 2024 at 13:56:33 BST, Paul B Mahol wrote:
Do it professionally instead, hire developers! (But I think most of
developers listed on ffmpeg page have job already.)
Isn't that a statement which fundamentally under
On 6/16/2024 7:02 AM, Bouke / edit 'B wrote:
You are feeding a thread that should not exist, so you, z!, are also feeding
trolls.
A thread that -I- created for a real problem, along with a reason why
isn't a problam and with a solution. Deal with it.
Stop, just stop.
Please do.
And st
Yes, I'm fully aware - it's just a bit much to gleefully point out that
they're all otherwise engaged!
P
On Sunday 16 June 2024 at 15:01:49 BST, Carl Zwanzig
wrote:
On 6/16/2024 6:54 AM, Phil Rhodes via ffmpeg-user wrote:
> Isn't that a statement which fundamentally undermines the enti
You are feeding a thread that should not exist, so you, z!, are also feeding
trolls.
Stop, just stop.
> On 16 Jun 2024, at 16:00, Carl Zwanzig wrote:
>
> On 6/16/2024 6:58 AM, Bouke / edit 'B wrote:
>> Do not feed trolls.
>
> How is calling out the use of top posting "feeding the trolls"?
On 6/16/2024 6:54 AM, Phil Rhodes via ffmpeg-user wrote:
Isn't that a statement which fundamentally undermines the entire concept
of ffmpeg as an open source project with willing developers...
More than a few OS projects have professional (and paid, they're not the
same thing) developers. No
On 6/16/2024 6:58 AM, Bouke / edit 'B wrote:
Do not feed trolls.
How is calling out the use of top posting "feeding the trolls"?
(It isn't.)
z!
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
Do not feed trolls.
> On 16 Jun 2024, at 15:56, Carl Zwanzig wrote:
>
> On 6/16/2024 2:33 AM, Binarus wrote:
>> to solve your problem.
>
>> ... for the same reasons that annoy you
>
>> However, your behavior ... Do you really ...to communicate with you
>
>> I strongly advise you to
On 6/16/2024 2:33 AM, Binarus wrote:
to solve your problem.
... for the same reasons that annoy you
However, your behavior ... Do you really
...to communicate with you
I strongly advise you to
- You do not have
etc
We only find out who "you" might be until we read down throu
On Sunday 16 June 2024 at 13:56:33 BST, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> Do it professionally instead, hire developers! (But I think most of
> developers listed on ffmpeg page have job already.)
Isn't that a statement which fundamentally undermines the entire concept of
ffmpeg as an open source project w
On Sun, Jun 16, 2024 at 1:51 PM Reindl Harald
wrote:
>
>
> Am 16.06.24 um 11:33 schrieb Binarus:
> > Yes, I am also impatient sometimes. And yes, I also have been very
> > disappointed by the FFMPEG community support; sometimes, I wasn't able
> > to get even the simplest explanations for question
Am 16.06.24 um 11:33 schrieb Binarus:
Yes, I am also impatient sometimes. And yes, I also have been very
disappointed by the FFMPEG community support; sometimes, I wasn't able
to get even the simplest explanations for questions that a developer
should be able to answer with no effort.
you
On Sun, Jun 16, 2024 at 11:33 AM Binarus wrote:
> I really have to kick in here, although I have no clue regarding the
> internals of FFMPEG, and although 90% of it are a mystery to me, and
> although I have to admit that I didn't get yet how to use it properly (and
> probably never will get that
I really have to kick in here, although I have no clue regarding the internals
of FFMPEG, and although 90% of it are a mystery to me, and although I have to
admit that I didn't get yet how to use it properly (and probably never will get
that). That is, I can't contribute anything to solve your
On Sun, Jun 16, 2024 at 10:19 AM Mark Filipak
wrote:
> On 16/06/2024 03.51, Jim DeLaHunt wrote:
> > On 2024-06-15 23:04, Mark Filipak wrote:
> >
> >> On 15/06/2024 23.39, Jim DeLaHunt wrote:
> >>> On 2024-06-15 19:27, Mark Filipak wrote:
> >>>
> It would be nice if folks from here went here:
On 16/06/2024 03.51, Jim DeLaHunt wrote:
On 2024-06-15 23:04, Mark Filipak wrote:
On 15/06/2024 23.39, Jim DeLaHunt wrote:
On 2024-06-15 19:27, Mark Filipak wrote:
It would be nice if folks from here went here:
https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/11055
and saw what is going on. It's up to 76 comm
On 2024-06-15 23:04, Mark Filipak wrote:
On 15/06/2024 23.39, Jim DeLaHunt wrote:
On 2024-06-15 19:27, Mark Filipak wrote:
It would be nice if folks from here went here:
https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/11055
and saw what is going on. It's up to 76 comments now, so what I ask
will take you a w
26 matches
Mail list logo
