PEG command that will result in MOV wrapped DV that displays without the
>> vertical borders?
>>
>> This is what I tried.
>>
>> 3137-Mac-Pro-DAM:~ kirelan$ ffmpeg -i 36058.dv -map 0 -c copy
>> 36058_Rewrap.mov
>
> __
3137-Mac-Pro-DAM:~ kirelan$ ffmpeg -i 36058.dv -map 0 -c copy 36058_Rewrap.mov
Try adding -aspect 4:3 (or 16:9 of course)
Bouke
videotoolshed.com
Van Oldenbarneveltstraat 33
6512 AS Nijmegen, the Netherlands
+31 6 21817248
If you want to send me larg
> On 29 Oct 2024, at 14:15, Flopsy wrote:
>
> On 29/10/2024 10:46 pm, Bouke / edit 'B wrote:
>> Smells like someone is soring by alphabet.
>>
>> Test it yourself after renaming the files 0001.mkv and 0002.mkv
>> See what happens then.
>
> Thank
fprobe -show_frames`, it does indeed show the frames in
> reverse (some lines omitted):
Smells like someone is soring by alphabet.
Test it yourself after renaming the files 0001.mkv and 0002.mkv
See what happens then.
No clue, but gut feeling tells me…
Bouke
___
> On 17 Aug 2024, at 22:33, Ulf Zibis wrote:
>
>
> Am 17.08.24 um 22:10 schrieb Bouke / Videotoolshed:
>> ..., it will be ‘another’ file with the same name.
> And WHAT then happens with the original file, when write creates ANOTHER file
> ???
Do not misquote me, and
, as you might
want to destroy some work.
Granted, you can do a select all, press space, press cmd S and pray for undo,
but that’s another story.
Now drop the subject. If you can script FFmpeg, you have a perfect good
solution with just two little lines of script.
Bouke
___
> On 7 Aug 2024, at 11:04, Phil Rhodes via ffmpeg-user
> wrote:
>
> Might this be achieved simply by detecting the differences between adjacent
> frames?
Sleeping cat
Cut to:
Plant on windowsill
Bouke
> P
> ___
>
e being transparant, so you
have one level of anti-alias (and with DVD SP generated ones, that’s not even
on the highest contrast.)
SRT can give you the best image quality possible, since it’s metadata.
Bouke
> All the best
> Thomas
>
> Le dim. 21 juil. 2024 à 13:57, Nicola
Pff, copy / paste from a Hex editor would do the trick, and then, a C coder
need to fall back to this raises eyebrows.
Bouke
> On 5 Jul 2024, at 17:29, Danny Mitchell wrote:
>
> On Sun, 30 Jun 2024 at 15:38, Michael Koch
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
rself there?)
But what we all want to know (since we’re all guys that like ‘press button
here, light goes on there'), what are you making?
Bouke
>
> Michael
>
>
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
enough to remember what that was.)
Bouke
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
n my fingers.
(There were a few lawsuits to a Dutch guy from Real Media, they sued a guy who
provided a link (note, link, not download) on his hobby site, to ‘alternative
Real player’.
Although Real lost everything, the poor dude went bankrupt and had to live with
his mother aga
, what 'ffmpeg -h filter=drawtext' shows?
Hi Paul,
Working version:
bouke@Boukes-iMac ~ %
/Volumes/Data/PycharmProjects/ffmpeg-20200831-4a11a6f-macos64-static/bin/ffmpeg
-h filter=drawtext
ffmpeg version git-2020-08-31-4a11a6f Copyright (c) 2000-2020 the FFmpeg
developers
built with Ap
> On 21 Jun 2024, at 13:09, Paul B Mahol wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 12:28 PM Bouke / Videotoolshed <
> bo...@videotoolshed.com> wrote:
>
>> My version (from evermeet.cx)
>> ffmpeg version 6.1.1-tessus https://evermeet.cx/ffmpeg/ Copyright (c)
&
]
outfile}...
Filter_complex_script fails:
Ffmpeg -threads 0 -i /Users/bouke/Downloads/test.mov -map 0:0
-filter_complex_script
/var/folders/sk/b6vcwqd93z70pfcdvhhq90rhgn/T/_vtsTmp_complex.txt -an
-timecode 01:00:09:13 -metadata:s:v:0 reel_name=test -c:v prores -profile:v 0
-vendor ap10
Hey Vincent, wij kennen elkaar, maak het niet groter dan dat het is…
Bouke
videotoolshed.com
Van Oldenbarneveltstraat 33
6512 AS Nijmegen, the Netherlands
+31 6 21817248
If you want to send me large files, please use:
https://videotoolshed.wetransfer.com/
> On 20 Jun 2024, at 01:51, Vinc
Well, why don’t you seek some professional help and get some drugs for your
anger problems?
> On 20 Jun 2024, at 01:20, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
>
> Am 20.06.24 um 01:16 schrieb Bouke / Videotoolshed:
>> Harald, I was not talking to you, nor do I have any interest in
ald wrote:
>
>
>
> Am 20.06.24 um 00:51 schrieb Bouke / Videotoolshed:
>> Do you have many friends?
>
> when you pretend that you have more than 10 friedns yiou confuse Faceboook
> with reality - quality matters - and now take your meds
_
> On 20 Jun 2024, at 00:48, MacFH - C E Macfarlane - News
> wrote:
>
> On 19/06/2024 23:40, Bouke / Videotoolshed wrote:
>>
>>> On 20 Jun 2024, at 00:31, MacFH - C E Macfarlane - News
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I've been following th
What am I doing, feeding the trolls myself….
So sorry, weak moment.
Mea Culpa!
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org
Well Charles, please introduce yourself, and explain why I never ever have
heard from you before.
(I’ll take your advise under…)
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
To unsubscribe, visit
May I suggest that MacFH - C E Macfarlane - News
Is in fact Mark Fillipak with an alternative e-mail address?
I could be wrong of course, but please, proof me wrong.
How to klll a troll?
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://f
> On 19 Jun 2024, at 23:19, Paul B Mahol wrote:
>
> Also derailing
After hundreds of (mostly) useless messages, initiated by somewone who promised
not to post not more than 8 messages per year, how can this be other than a
derailing trolling thread?
Am I the only one who is fed up with thi
> On 17 Jun 2024, at 08:26, Binarus wrote:
>
> On 16.06.2024 15:58, Bouke / edit 'B wrote:
>> Do not feed trolls.
>
> Do you mean me?
Of course not!
>
> Then please show where you think I have behaved like a troll. Since I have
> begun using the intern
Hi Harald,
As a professional, my time is worth something.
How much does it cost never to be bothered by you again?
It is not helpfull, nor joy, nor constructive, only a major PITA.
So, please, name your price!
Bouke
videotoolshed.com
Van Oldenbarneveltstraat 33
6512 AS Nijmegen, the Netherlands
You are feeding a thread that should not exist, so you, z!, are also feeding
trolls.
Stop, just stop.
> On 16 Jun 2024, at 16:00, Carl Zwanzig wrote:
>
> On 6/16/2024 6:58 AM, Bouke / edit 'B wrote:
>> Do not feed trolls.
>
> How is calling out the use of top p
Do not feed trolls.
> On 16 Jun 2024, at 15:56, Carl Zwanzig wrote:
>
> On 6/16/2024 2:33 AM, Binarus wrote:
>> to solve your problem.
>
>> ... for the same reasons that annoy you
>
>> However, your behavior ... Do you really ...to communicate with you
>
>> I strongly advise you to
This cam writes Mp4 without a QuickTime timecode track, but it does write
’something’ that ’should’ be (about) correct. (It’s a known issue it’s off by
one or two frames when slaved.)
ffprobe -v error -print_format json -show_format -show_streams
/Users/bouke/Downloads/Sony\ FX3/PRIVATE/M4ROOT
> On 9 Apr 2024, at 13:45, Gyan Doshi wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2024-04-09 02:46 pm, Bouke / edit 'B wrote:
>> For my work I try an install of FFmpeg by running it without any params.
>>
>> It used to be that the return would include ‘Hyper fast’.
>> Ho
indeed installed
/ running properly?
Bouke
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
lody off. Is there a way to make the
> playback completely continuous with no delay?
Not tested, but I would try to do the loop in FFmpeg and pipe to FFplay.
This way FFplay will get just samples, bypassing whatever happens on restart
playback of the file.
Bouke
_
On 24 Feb 2024, at 12:37, Paul B Mahol wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 24, 2024 at 11:33 AM Bouke / Videotoolshed <
> bo...@videotoolshed.com> wrote:
>
>> Trying to split a 64 channel 48Khz 24 bits Wave file.
>> That is VERY slow.
>>
>> ffmpeg -i /Volumes
ss, it slows down to about 0.7x
I don’t get it. DiskIO should not be a factor, and there is no math involved.
(Granted, the ppm_s24le might involve math, but that should be simple.)
Is this a bug?
(Same happens vice versa, going from multiple non-interleaved to one big
inter
> On 19 Feb 2024, at 19:23, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
>
> Am 19.02.24 um 19:20 schrieb Bouke / edit 'B:
>> My most sincere apologies to the list.
>> I have a mental condition that forces me to indulge in these kind of
>> discussions, while it is clearl
>
> On 19 Feb 2024, at 19:14, Mark Filipak wrote:
>
> On 19/02/2024 13.11, Bouke / edit 'B wrote:
>>> On 19 Feb 2024, at 19:04, Mark Filipak wrote:
>>>
>>> On 19/02/2024 12.59, Bouke / edit 'B wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
> On 19 Feb 2024, at 19:04, Mark Filipak wrote:
>
> On 19/02/2024 12.59, Bouke / edit 'B wrote:
>>>
>>> On 19 Feb 2024, at 18:47, Mark Filipak wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm not writing a book.
>>> That's something someone made up.
>
> On 19 Feb 2024, at 18:47, Mark Filipak wrote:
>
> I'm not writing a book.
> That's something someone made up.
Yes, the ’someone' was you. Search the archives.
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/list
Even though I used the word "or" in my post, the use of any of the
architectural techniques can be mixed.
On the subject of you being a troll, you wrote that you posted no more than 6
posts a year.
That turns out to be ‘a day’
Go away, or at least shut up.
___
So do you, so why ask the question?
Now go away!
> On 11 Feb 2024, at 19:05, Mark Filipak wrote:
>
> On 11/02/2024 13.00, Bouke / Videotoolshed wrote:
>> Stop trolling.
>> Read in on the subject. You want to write a FFmpeg manual?
>> Go away, don’t spam the rest of
Stop trolling.
Read in on the subject. You want to write a FFmpeg manual?
Go away, don’t spam the rest of us.
> On 11 Feb 2024, at 18:47, Mark Filipak wrote:
>
> Command 1:
> ffmpeg -ss 10 -copyts -i this.m2ts -map 0 -c copy -sn -dn -muxdelay 0
> that.m2ts
> Command 2:
> ffmpeg -copyts -i this.
> I'd pay $25/month to belong.
I pay 25 bucks for each troll head.
(Or 50 per ball, makes for more fun)
Bouke
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
To unsubscribe, visit link a
e omitted
>
> Perhaps some day I'll look at the command arg time parser to see what
> assumptions are made and where they're documented.
Don’t feed the trolls.
Bouke
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/
> For clarity, I wasn't accusing you of lying and it certainly wasn't my
> intention to imply that; my apologies if it sounded that way!
Don’t feed the trolls
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmp
> On 26 Dec 2023, at 21:13, Mark Filipak wrote:
How about stopping trolling if you know it all?
The ‘imdb’ in your mail address makes you an even bigger jerk.
Bouke
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mail
> On 19 Dec 2023, at 17:24, Erik Dobberkau wrote:
>
>>
>> @Shuto: I'm sure you've noticed already that you will want to adjust the
>> frame rate (option "-r"). But I'm not sure if that does also require an
>> adjustment of the -buf
e issue mentioned here:
> https://www.mail-archive.com/ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org/msg26313.html
> <https://www.mail-archive.com/ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org/msg26313.html> (and
> its follow-up messages) is not an issue anymore?
No clue, only thing I know is that the stupid broad
Top posting, as my mail client does now allow for decent parsing, and I’m fed
up with that.
My command to create ‘’proper” XDcam HD 50Mb, as required by the broadcasters
here.
Read between the filenames, it does work.
/Applications/ffmpeg -hide_banner -threads 0 -i /Users/bouke/yadda.mov -f
atter the actual content.
For Avid media, that might (depending on the version of MC) be important for a
‘fast import’, or omitting adapters you don’t want / need.
In broadcast, over here interlaced is mandatory, even if the content is
progressive.
So no, it’s NOT complicated, and no, it’s NOT outd
cant smaller, at the cost of more
processing time / cpu use.
(And thus energy use, but if you stream too large files a gazillion times, you
might want to invest in high quality encoding instead of quick ’n dirty.)
It’s a ‘would you like to be bitten by the cat or by the do
ike to know
> how to estimate the final video size.
Why is the output size important if you use -preset ultrafast?
Bouke
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
To unsubscribe, visit li
Trying to build a metering tool that displays (almost) RT values.
On Mac, all works fine with AVfoundation, but on Win with Directshow I have an
issue:
C:\Users\Bouke>ffmpeg.exe -nostats -f dshow -ar 48000 -i audio="Line (Steinberg
CI2)" -filter_complex "ebur128=peak=true&quo
>
> On 1 Mar 2023, at 11:53, Bouke / Videotoolshed
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> Trying to get a visualisation of my levels during record / stream.
> This works fine for file based material:
>
> ffplay -f lavfi -i
> "amovie=/Users/bouke/Downloads/test.wav,ebur128=v
Hi,
Trying to get a visualisation of my levels during record / stream.
This works fine for file based material:
ffplay -f lavfi -i
"amovie=/Users/bouke/Downloads/test.wav,ebur128=video=1:meter=18:target=-16
[out0][out1]"
But I would like to have a live source (I’m on Mac, AVfoundati
led, and I’ve worked (as a pro in movies /
tv) with subs for over 20 years.
Bouke
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
ext line.
You do not have a stupid black line, you have overlapping boxes so the alpha
will double.
Increase line spacing and it ’should’ be fine. (I did not try, but I’m pretty
confident.)
And for my taste, just outline is enough, boxes are ugly and came from stupid
CC / TeleText.
Bouke
> I
me with a scale as small as you can get, with
highly compressed sound and use the entire file size for the MOOV atom size
(plus a bit).
Hth,
Bouke
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
To u
y ffmpeg, I just write data chunks to the destination stream.
Are you trying to concat mp3 chunks? That seems like a bad idea,
Concat the raw PCM, then convert that to mp3
bouke
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailm
pure python, why find the cause and not
do it yourself in C?
Bouke
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
Bonus points if you get the reference.
I also like the smell in the afternoon, and evening, and night.
(Hunting targets.)
IOW:
SHUT UP
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
To unsubscribe,
On 31 Dec 2022, at 10:41, Michael Koch wrote:
>
> Am 31.12.2022 um 10:31 schrieb Bouke / Videotoolshed:
>> On 31 Dec 2022, at 04:53, Gyan Doshi wrote:
>>> On 2022-12-31 08:15 am, David Niklas wrote:
>>>> Sorry for taking so long to reply.
>>>
tiple
filters, I do too and just got bitten):
There is a limitation on Windows that won’t accept long arguments.
In that case, save the filter_complex string to a file, then, instead of
filter_complex you can use filter_complex_script with the filename as argument.
Bouke
_
at the
> beginning/end, that the examples add black boxes
Try filter_complex "[0:0]youfilter=enable='between(t,1.0,2.0)’”
Hth
Bouke
> to. I cannot seem to
> figure out how to set the start and end timestamp.
>
> Thanks,
> David
> __
It’s no problem at all.
Btw, it’s very common to store progressive as interlaced, as broadcast still
requires interlaced material, no matter how it is shot.
From memory, just do a -c copy and you’ll end up with the source in a
progressive container.
Bouke
> On 05 Dec 2022, at 11:56, Stei
> On 30 Nov 2022, at 17:17, Carl Zwanzig wrote:
>
> Doubtful, IME.
I enjoyed it, even showed some to my GF.
Bouke
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
To unsubscribe, v
o set aspect
to 4:3 (in this case), or scale to a 4:3 ratio.
Hth,
Bouke
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
ps it off.
Bouke
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
> On 06 Nov 2022, at 21:35, Björn Büchel via ffmpeg-user
> wrote:
>
> Hi Bouke,
> Thanks for the reply. You are right, that makes no sense. But this is what I
> found out.
> I checked the TC with Avid Media Composer as well as with Resolve and
> Premiere.
>
ense, a frames to tc
routine will not use a different FPS for hours / minutes / seconds and frames.
When you say ‘original File TC’, what makes you so sure that is indeed correct?
What software tells you that? Did you try other apps? (Resolve / Premiere /
Avid / Quicktime player / w
he image.
Instead, pillarbox it, using the pad filter, if needed in combo with scale.
https://ffmpeg.org/ffmpeg-filters.html#pad
Bouke
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
To unsubscribe, visit
> On 24 Oct 2022, at 14:29, Naveen.B wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 24 Oct 2022, at 12:52, Naveen.B wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello Team,
>>>
>>> I have managed to convert raw Images files to .mp4 video,
>>> I need to encode to a RAW video instead, could you please let me know the
>>> command for this?
>>>
>>
1600x1300
> fps-30
> bit depth-16bit
>
Do not specify a video codec, or set -c:v rawhide, set your frame rate /
resolution / bit depth params and use .raw as extension.
Bouke
> Thanks and Regards,
> Naveen B.
> ___
> ffmpeg
WTF,
I did NOT, I repeat, NOT write the message below.
And my mail has not been hacked, so what is going on?
Bouke
> On 8 Jul 2022, at 12:17, Bouke / Videotoolshed
> wrote:
>
> Please provide full command and console output, and do NOT top post here!
>>
>> I have a
Please provide full command and console output, and do NOT top post here!
>
> I have a raw video file captured from the monochrome camera, I need to
> convert the raw video file to visualise it in .avi or .mp4.
> I tried this command, but this did not worked out to me,
> ffmpeg -f rawvideo -pixel_
> On 8 Jul 2022, at 04:23, Budi wrote:
>
> $ ffmpeg -i "b.mp4" -to 0:2:20 a.mp4
>
>
> used to do it nicely done in few seconds
FFmpeg -i "b.mp4" -to 0:2:20 -c: copy a.mp4
Mind the codec copy.
If you omit that, FFmpeg will transcode, resul
Beledig me niet, lijk met niet in lijn met je princiepes / de Heer, iig siert
het niemand.
Bouke / edit 'B
videotoolshed.com
Van Oldenbarneveltstraat 33
6512 AS Nijmegen, the Netherlands
+31 6 21817248
If you want to send me large files, please use:
https://videotoolshed.wetransfer.com/
Pff, make it an option.
Finding someone who knows this stuff is less work than this shit, including the
top post flaming.
Boukee use:
https://videotoolshed.wetransfer.com/
> On 29 Jun 2022, at 13:19, Cecil Westerhof via ffmpeg-user
> wrote:
>
> Bouke / Videotoolshed
> On 29 Jun 2022, at 12:54, Cecil Westerhof via ffmpeg-user
> wrote:
>
> Bouke / Videotoolshed writes:
>
>> No, sorry. But, hire an editor / designer to do this for you,
>> results will be better / less pain.
>> If you want to have it done for free, be my gu
for you, results will be
better / less pain.
If you want to have it done for free, be my guest, but don’t ask my help, do
not expect any half decent results.
Bouke
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/lis
ssible, yes, it will be ugly unless you know what you are doing,
and IMHO, FFmpeg is not the tool for this.
(But someone recently mentioned a GUI for filters, that might help you big time
on this one.)
Bouke
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@f
ct not very long ago?
Bouke
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
ficient.
BUT, since you don’t give any clue what / who has to process the output of your
work, trust me, hire a specialist to drag this out of you.
I’m trying to help you, but for that, you need to provide more input.
Bouke / edit 'B
videotoolshed.com
Van Oldenbarneveltstraat 33
6512 AS Nijmeg
> On 20 Apr 2022, at 19:50, Shubham Tiwari wrote:
>
> 1 million audio files per day.
Hire a specialist. Now. Immediately. Pay him / her well. Do NOT hesitate. Do
NOT think, just do it. Right now.
It WILL pay off.
Did I mention you DO NOT HAVE time to waste?
Bouke
n your input is uncompressed
Wave PCM. (Wave Can be compressed, in your case, you have OGG compression with
a .wav extension.)
What do you expect / why are you doing this? The quality of your file will NOT
get better, nor will the file size get significant down if you process it.
Concernin
Hi Shubham,
When I copy your mail below (not done on this list, mind you!), it’s exactly as
long as it was before. What do you expect?
Bouke
> On 20 Apr 2022, at 15:01, Shubham Tiwari wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> When I run ffmpeg command on a wav file, the received output file is of
d quite
> stupid.
Hear hear!
Now, IMHO, audio mapping in FFmpeg is plain stupid. FFMBC’s approach what so
much easier / better.
(On top of that, ripping just sound from an AV file with FFMBC was WAY faster,
as FFMBC was able to ignore the video data, where FFmpeg seems to feel a need
to ploug
> On 19 Apr 2022, at 21:00, Carl Zwanzig wrote:
>
> On 4/19/2022 11:52 AM, Bouke / edit 'B wrote:
>>> How would you do that when there are only parameters for R and B?
>
>> AFAIK, YUV = R-Y B-Y, so it’s just math.
>> Doing corrections in RGB is si
ameters for R and B?
>
> z!
AFAIK, YUV = R-Y B-Y, so it’s just math.
Doing corrections in RGB is simpler for a mortal, but should / could result
exactly the same. Now, let someone write something to convert the matrix to
support RGB.
Bouke
___
ffm
t/p/bmxlib/home/Home/
<https://sourceforge.net/p/bmxlib/home/Home/>
If you have a recent version of Avid MC, you can use normal Op1 MXF, but those
have to go to
Avid MediaFiles/UME/xxx
Both can work, I’ve done it before.
Hth,
Bouke
___
ffm
Learn to live with it, as well as the flaming for top posting, as I’m about to
receive.
(Or not, if I tell I actually like it to be spanked by nerds.(
Bouke
> On 12 Apr 2022, at 19:02, CMG DiGiTaL wrote:
>
> I have noticed, from the harsh and uneducated answers, that the
> distin
e audio with:
>>
>> ffmpeg -i input.wav -filter:a
>> loudnorm=I=-17:TP=-1:LRA=9:measured_I=-22.72:measured_TP=-2.67:measured_LRA=6.10:measured_thresh=-33.31:offset=-0.05:linear=true:print_format=summary
Why not just add 6 dB to the input?
That ’should’ do the trick just f
> On 9 Feb 2022, at 18:32, Mark Filipak wrote:
>
> Hello, All,
Bye Mark.go away!
Now. No time to waste. Unsub / close your internet account / kill yourself /
hire someone to do that for you, I don’t care, just, stop.
Bouke
___
ffmpeg-use
> On 30 Dec 2021, at 15:16, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
>
> Am 30.12.21 um 15:05 schrieb Bouke / edit 'B:
>>> On 30 Dec 2021, at 14:58, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>>
>>> it's amazing that you
>> Hey Harald,
>> Are you allright? You
> On 30 Dec 2021, at 14:58, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> it's amazing that you
Hey Harald,
Are you allright? You almost sound polite!
Is everything well? Should someone call a doctor / inform the authorities?
Bouke
___
ffmpeg-use
\
>output.mkv
I think you are inserting black, not overlaying (blanking) the video. Try -vf
overlay.
With -ss before input, it will do a faster search, you might have to do a bit
of math on the enable= range, but that will become very obvious with a sma
> On 17 Dec 2021, at 11:08, Bo Berglund wrote:
>
> Can I keep the copy for video but re-encode for audio?
> Some ffmpeg command suggestion?
-c:v copy -c:a ‘something’, but no clue if it will help you…
Bouke
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
cked to other equipment and is the most important metadata,
any post software will use that instead of file creation time.
Bouke
>[…]
>$ ffmpeg -i ZOOM0004.WAV -metadata creation_time="03:17:33" OUT.WAV
>[…]
>$ ffprobe OUT.WAV
>[…]
>
nd does
not hold all video as expected.
My guess (I don't have access to the machine it's running on now) is that the
buffer isn't processed after the 'q' is received.
Could this be the case? If so, any workaround?
(Besides looking at the amount of frames encoded and wait until it matches the
time user pressed 'stop record'.)
thx
Bouke
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
> On 11 Aug 2021, at 12:18, Bouke wrote:
>
>>
>> On 11 Aug 2021, at 09:01, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Am 10.08.2021 um 11:03 schrieb Bouke :
>>>
>>> I'm using the R128 functionality now, but Netflix wants so
> On 11 Aug 2021, at 09:01, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>
>
>
>> Am 10.08.2021 um 11:03 schrieb Bouke :
>>
>> I'm using the R128 functionality now, but Netflix wants sound to be Dolby
>> dialogue-gated measured.
>
>> Seems that the needed Dol
ivery-spec-a-stroke-of-genius
Some work seems to be done already:
https://github.com/reaper-oss/sws/issues/1046
<https://github.com/reaper-oss/sws/issues/1046>
Is it possible to implement this in FFmpeg? Can I sponsor / hire a developer?
1 - 100 of 235 matches
Mail list logo
