Sorry to keep contradicting myself Mark Filipak, but I'm still wondering if
perhaps there is something wrong in your shuffle/mix/interleave command
because to me, having looked once again, the output sequence doesn't appear
to included any weighted mixes of source frames 1 and 2 or 3 and 4, for
exa
Sorry - ignore what I said about the jumping back - I've had another look
and I was wrong about that.
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-us
Hi Mark,
Thank you once again for that detailed explanation of your ingenious
solution! I think I finally understand it now (having spent a few hours
working through it) and I might also understand the leaping back behaviour:
It looks to me like your interleave filter will output the following
seq
Thank you both,
Intuitively, it didn't make sense to me either to change the speed AND
employ motion compensation so it's great to hear that you agree. That was
what I was driving at when I asked if I should treat 24000/1001 differently
to 3/1001 and you've confirmed that I do.
So I think I've
Yes, my apologies - I don't get the luminance bands either when I don't try
to deinterlace the progressive source or if I do deinterlace and
reinterlace interlaced inputs so it seems there was no problem with the
framerate filter after all.
I would still be very interested to hear any optimisation
... actually, I've just realised that I'm being a doofus. That source is
progressive. Sorry - I'll test again with an interlaced source.
>
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
To unsubscribe
Hi again Carl,
I've done another test and have uploaded both the input and output files
(which shows the luminance bands problem near the bottom of the output
picture) here:
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1YTUNHm4_oIZFfGge-JqlDT0c71ioLulY?usp=sharing
Here is my command and the console out
Hi Mark,
Many thanks for the detailed reply - it does indeed sound like we're
treading parallel paths although, to be quite honest, I don't fully
understand your mix/decimate method. It sounds very promising though so I
very much look forward to seeing your working filter!
Thanks again,
Bruce.
Hi Carl,
Many thanks for your response. The background to this is that I have to
transcode 23.976fps and 29.97fps content for a VOD platform that will only
accept 25fps. Their documentation says that *prefer *speed change when
going from 23.976fps or 24fps to 25fps but that they also require motio
Hello,
I'm looking for advice on the best ways to convert 23.976fps and 29.97fps
AVC-I 100Mbps content to 25fps (also interlaced AVC-I 100Mbps).
So far I have tried the fps filter as follows:
ffmpeg \
-i 23_967.mxf \
-filter_complex "[0:v:0]fps=fps=25[v25fps]" \
-map "[v25fps]" -map a: -codec
Many thanks zhilizhao!
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 12:12 PM "zhilizhao(赵志立)"
wrote:
>
>
> > On Jan 19, 2021, at 6:57 PM, Bruce Roberts wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm trying to generate Apple mediastreamvalidator compliant HLS using
> > ff
Hello,
I'm trying to generate Apple mediastreamvalidator compliant HLS using
ffmpeg and have very nearly achieved that.
The only remaining problem is that use of " -hls_flags iframes_only"
correctly adds the #EXT-X-I-FRAMES-ONLY tag to my trickplay m3u8 but it
doesn't increment the #EXT-X-VERSION
Hello,
I'm trying to generate Apple mediastreamvalidator compliant HLS using
ffmpeg and have very nearly achieved that.
The only remaining problem is that use of " -hls_flags iframes_only"
correctly adds the #EXT-X-I-FRAMES-ONLY tag to my trickplay m3u8 but it
doesn't increment the #EXT-X-VERSION
Hello again Carl,
First of all, apologies for top-posting. I had read about it and *thought* I'd
avoided it last time but clearly I hadn't. Hopefully what I've done this
time will have done the trick.
I have now simplified my command and tried it with the current ffmpeg git
head. More importantly
st regards,
Bruce.
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 3:40 PM Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>
>
> > Am 11.05.2020 um 13:34 schrieb Bruce Roberts :
> >
> > ffmpeg version 3.2.4
>
> Please test current FFmpeg git head.
>
> Carl Eugen
> ___
Thank you in advance for your help with this problem.
I have been experimenting with the various deinterlacing options and have
found that mcdeint produces excellent results.
As the ffmpeg filters documentation explains, mcdeint "needs one field per
frame as input and must thus be used together w
16 matches
Mail list logo