[FFmpeg-user] Re: 'split'+'interleave' causes FFmpeg to use the wrong 'tbn'

On Sat, Sep 6, 2025 at 4:17 AM Mark Filipak via ffmpeg-user < ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org> wrote: > Attached: v.mkv (282 kB) > FFmpeg version: ffmpeg-2025-09-04-git-2611874a50-full_build > > Howdy, > > Making an mp4, it appears that 'split'+'interleave' causes FFmpeg to use > the input's 'tbn' (i.e. v.

Re: [FFmpeg-user] "corrupt decoded frame"

see -xerror flag ? On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 10:08 PM Mark Filipak wrote: > Here are two notices out of hundreds like them. They are in an FFREPORT > log. > > = > [h264 @ 198b8040] concealing 7744 DC, 7744 AC, 7744 MV errors in > P frame > > [vist#0:0/h264 @ 06fc2e00] [dec:h264

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Chroma subsampling formats

On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 11:12 PM Mark Filipak wrote: > On 21/07/2025 18.54, Paul B Mahol wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 10:12 PM Mark Filipak < > markfilipak.i...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> On 21/07/2025 17.50, Paul B Mahol wrote: > >> &

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Chroma subsampling formats

On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 10:12 PM Mark Filipak wrote: > On 21/07/2025 17.50, Paul B Mahol wrote: > > > Number of Cb pixels === Number of Cr pixels, ALWAYS! > > I know that's what a lot of people assume, but it doesn't jibe with what > I'm seeing. Perhaps that&#

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Chroma subsampling formats

On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 9:17 PM Mark Filipak wrote: > On 21/07/2025 15.46, Paul B Mahol wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 6:55 PM Mark Filipak > > > wrote: > > > >> Here's my latest revision preceded by some of my ramblings. > >> > >> O

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Chroma subsampling formats

On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 6:55 PM Mark Filipak wrote: > Here's my latest revision preceded by some of my ramblings. > > Oh, Brother, showing pixels as areas of light really is a siren enticing > me to go overboard and swim to the island. But it's death that's on the > island. > > I've had to remind

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Chroma subsampling formats

On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 7:57 PM Mark Filipak wrote: > On 15/07/2025 15.40, Paul B Mahol wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 7:34 PM Mark Filipak > > > wrote: > > >>Y element, pixels 0..3 > >> /Cb element, pixels 0..3 > >

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Chroma subsampling formats

On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 7:34 PM Mark Filipak wrote: > On 15/07/2025 14.51, Paul B Mahol wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 6:00 PM Mark Filipak > > > wrote: > > > >> Are these correct? Or, is there some official reference I can consult? > >> >

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Chroma subsampling formats

On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 6:00 PM Mark Filipak wrote: > Are these correct? Or, is there some official reference I can consult? > Maybe correct for packed formats only. > --Mark. > > KEY: > ¤ —— Element exists in the field and is sampled > • —— Element exists in the field but is not sampled >

Re: [FFmpeg-user] dvdsubs

On Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 2:01 AM Mark Filipak < markfilipak.imdb-at-gmail@ffmpeg.org> wrote: > The documentation says that dvdsubs are bit mapped. I don't think so. > Aren't dvdsubs run length encoded? > Can they be both at same time? > > --Mark. > __

Re: [FFmpeg-user] colorspace v colormatrix

On Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 1:27 AM Mark Filipak < markfilipak.imdb-at-gmail@ffmpeg.org> wrote: > On 25/06/2025 20.36, BloodMan wrote: > > Hi, > > W dniu 2025-06-26 o 01:49, Mark Filipak pisze: > >> What is the relationship between colormatrix and colorspace? Are they > used together or separately

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Yes or No? About the processing pipeline.

On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 2:16 PM Mark Filipak < markfilipak.imdb-at-gmail@ffmpeg.org> wrote: > On 19/06/2025 10.08, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > > Am 19.06.25 um 16:03 schrieb Mark Filipak: > >> Linux is FOSS. There are no interface standards in Linux because no one > is paid to establish and > >

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Yes or No? About the processing pipeline.

On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 1:40 PM Mark Filipak < markfilipak.imdb-at-gmail@ffmpeg.org> wrote: > On topic: > > If the input is 8-bit ybr420-smpte170m, then the head end of the > processing pipeline is also 8-bit > ybr420-smpte170m. Yes or No? > Some people never change mind, never learn new thin

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Yes or No? About the processing pipeline.

On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 10:37 AM Mark Filipak < markfilipak.imdb-at-gmail@ffmpeg.org> wrote: > On 18/06/2025 23.56, Carl Zwanzig wrote: > > On 6/18/2025 2:41 PM, Mark Filipak wrote: > >> Z, how am I or anyone to know what "sost#0:2" means? I don't even know > what "sost" means. > > (does that

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Yes or No? About the processing pipeline.

On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 11:19 PM Mark Filipak < markfilipak.imdb-at-gmail@ffmpeg.org> wrote: > On 17/06/2025 12.50, Paul B Mahol wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 4:18 PM Mark Filipak < > > markfilipak.imdb-at-gmail@ffmpeg.org> wrote: > > > >>

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Yes or No? About the processing pipeline.

On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 5:41 PM Mark Filipak < markfilipak.imdb-at-gmail@ffmpeg.org> wrote: > On 17/06/2025 13.37, Paul B Mahol wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 5:33 PM Mark Filipak < > > markfilipak.imdb-at-gmail@ffmpeg.org> wrote: > > > >&g

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Yes or No? About the processing pipeline.

On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 5:33 PM Mark Filipak < markfilipak.imdb-at-gmail@ffmpeg.org> wrote: > On 17/06/2025 13.31, Paul B Mahol wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 5:24 PM Mark Filipak < > > markfilipak.imdb-at-gmail@ffmpeg.org> wrote: > > > >&g

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Yes or No? About the processing pipeline.

On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 5:24 PM Mark Filipak < markfilipak.imdb-at-gmail@ffmpeg.org> wrote: > On 17/06/2025 13.20, Paul B Mahol wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 5:18 PM Mark Filipak < > > markfilipak.imdb-at-gmail@ffmpeg.org> wrote: > > > >&g

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Yes or No? About the processing pipeline.

On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 5:18 PM Mark Filipak < markfilipak.imdb-at-gmail@ffmpeg.org> wrote: > On 17/06/2025 13.15, Paul B Mahol wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 5:12 PM Mark Filipak < > > markfilipak.imdb-at-gmail@ffmpeg.org> wrote: > > > >>

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Yes or No? About the processing pipeline.

On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 5:12 PM Mark Filipak < markfilipak.imdb-at-gmail@ffmpeg.org> wrote: > Yes (true) or No (false)? > > If the input is 8-bit ybr420-smpte170m, then the processing pipeline is > also 8-bit ybr420-smpte170m. > > Depends on all components used in pipeline. > Regards, > Mar

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Yes or No? About the processing pipeline.

On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 5:01 PM Mark Filipak < markfilipak.imdb-at-gmail@ffmpeg.org> wrote: > On 17/06/2025 12.50, Paul B Mahol wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 4:18 PM Mark Filipak < > > markfilipak.imdb-at-gmail@ffmpeg.org> wrote: > > > >>

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Yes or No? About the processing pipeline.

On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 4:18 PM Mark Filipak < markfilipak.imdb-at-gmail@ffmpeg.org> wrote: > Yes (true) or No (false)? > > If the input is 8-bit ybr420-smpte170m, then the processing pipeline is > also 8-bit ybr420-smpte170m. > There is no such thing like ybr420. > > If the input is 8-bit

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Stream #0:0(und)

On Sun, Jun 15, 2025 at 4:39 PM Mark Filipak < markfilipak.imdb-at-gmail@ffmpeg.org> wrote: > On 14/06/2025 08.35, Andrew Randrianasulu wrote: > > сб, 14 июн. 2025 г., 15:21 Mark Filipak < > > markfilipak.imdb-at-gmail@ffmpeg.org>: > > > >&g

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Stream #0:0(und)

undefined? On Sat, Jun 14, 2025 at 12:54 AM Mark Filipak < markfilipak.imdb-at-gmail@ffmpeg.org> wrote: > "Stream #0:0(und)" What does "und" mean? > > Thanks--Mark. > ___ > ffmpeg-user mailing list > ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailm

Re: [FFmpeg-user] mov_text

On Tue, Jun 10, 2025 at 5:50 PM Mark Filipak < markfilipak.imdb-at-gmail@ffmpeg.org> wrote: > ffmpeg-all.html > "18.31 text2movsub > Convert text subtitles to MOV subtitles (as used by the mov_text codec) > with metadata headers." > > ffmpeg-codecs.html > ("mov_text" not found.) > > Is there a

Re: [FFmpeg-user] pgssub direct to .sub & .idx ? Possible?

On Tue, Jun 10, 2025 at 2:56 PM Mark Filipak < markfilipak.imdb-at-gmail@ffmpeg.org> wrote: > On 10/06/2025 10.46, Paul B Mahol wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 10, 2025 at 2:37 PM Mark Filipak < > > markfilipak.imdb-at-gmail@ffmpeg.org> wrote: > > > >> Tha

Re: [FFmpeg-user] pgssub direct to .sub & .idx ? Possible?

On Tue, Jun 10, 2025 at 3:50 PM Mark Filipak < markfilipak.imdb-at-gmail@ffmpeg.org> wrote: > On 10/06/2025 11.06, Paul B Mahol wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 10, 2025 at 3:06 PM Paul B Mahol wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Jun 10, 2025 at 2:56 

Re: [FFmpeg-user] pgssub direct to .sub & .idx ? Possible?

On Tue, Jun 10, 2025 at 3:06 PM Paul B Mahol wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 10, 2025 at 2:56 PM Mark Filipak < > markfilipak.imdb-at-gmail@ffmpeg.org> wrote: > >> On 10/06/2025 10.46, Paul B Mahol wrote: >> > On Tue, Jun 10, 2025 at 2:37 PM Mark Fili

Re: [FFmpeg-user] pgssub direct to .sub & .idx ? Possible?

to improve > it. > > On 10/06/2025 09.53, Paul B Mahol wrote: > > Which subtitle format is accepting dvdsub codec stream? > > The standard is .sub & .idx -- two files in tandem -- what I'm calling > "dvdsub-in-sub-with-idx". > > > .sub extens

Re: [FFmpeg-user] pgssub direct to .sub & .idx ? Possible?

On Tue, Jun 10, 2025 at 1:53 PM Paul B Mahol wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 10, 2025 at 1:39 PM Mark Filipak < > markfilipak.imdb-at-gmail@ffmpeg.org> wrote: > >> Is there a workaround for the failure below? If there is, it will save me >> an extra, mkvextract

Re: [FFmpeg-user] pgssub direct to .sub & .idx ? Possible?

On Tue, Jun 10, 2025 at 1:39 PM Mark Filipak < markfilipak.imdb-at-gmail@ffmpeg.org> wrote: > Is there a workaround for the failure below? If there is, it will save me > an extra, mkvextract step > and about 10 minutes per movie. > > Thanks!--Mark. > > > I've been doing this: > > Next, convert

Re: [FFmpeg-user] MP4s (and M4As) for music

On Mon, Jun 9, 2025 at 11:55 AM Reino Wijnsma wrote: > Hello Mark, > > On 2025-06-08T19:27:20+0200, Mark Filipak > wrote: > > I want archival quality. > On 2025-06-07T21:17:03+0200, Mark Filipak > wrote: > > ffmpeg^ > > -i "c:\Ashra, Correlations [1979] chapters.txt"^ > > -i c:\01.WAV^ > >

Re: [FFmpeg-user] FLAC experience so far

On Sun, Jun 8, 2025 at 11:31 PM Mark Filipak < markfilipak.imdb-at-gmail@ffmpeg.org> wrote: > The source: c:\01.WAV > 620,398,844 bytes > > ffmpeg^ > -i c:\01.WAV^ > -map 0^ > -c flac^ > "c:\Manual Goettsching [1992] E2-E4.flac.m4a" > > Provoked: "Could not find tag for codec flac in s

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Is FLAC lossless for compression_level > 0?

On Sun, Jun 8, 2025 at 8:36 PM Mark Filipak < markfilipak.imdb-at-gmail@ffmpeg.org> wrote: > Is FLAC (Free Lossless Audio Codec) lossless for compression_level > 0? > That is possible of course -- trading compression for encoding time -- but > the documentation doesn't > say. > Its just diffe

Re: [FFmpeg-user] MP4s (and M4As) for music

On Sun, Jun 8, 2025 at 6:31 PM Mark Filipak < markfilipak.imdb-at-gmail@ffmpeg.org> wrote: > On 08/06/2025 14.26, Paul B Mahol wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 8, 2025 at 6:18 PM Mark Filipak < > > markfilipak.imdb-at-gmail@ffmpeg.org> wrote: > > > >&g

Re: [FFmpeg-user] MP4s (and M4As) for music

On Sun, Jun 8, 2025 at 6:10 PM Mark Filipak < markfilipak.imdb-at-gmail@ffmpeg.org> wrote: > On 08/06/2025 13.52, Bernhard Döbler wrote: > > Am 08.06.2025 um 19:47 schrieb Mark Filipak: > >> FLAC is not a standard. I don't trust that it will be around in the > future. > > > > What constitutes

Re: [FFmpeg-user] MP4s (and M4As) for music

On Sun, Jun 8, 2025 at 6:18 PM Mark Filipak < markfilipak.imdb-at-gmail@ffmpeg.org> wrote: > On 08/06/2025 13.51, Paul B Mahol wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 8, 2025 at 5:42 PM Mark Filipak < > > markfilipak.imdb-at-gmail@ffmpeg.org> wrote: > > > &g

Re: [FFmpeg-user] MP4s (and M4As) for music

On Sun, Jun 8, 2025 at 5:42 PM Mark Filipak < markfilipak.imdb-at-gmail@ffmpeg.org> wrote: > ffmpeg^ > -i "c:\chapters.txt"^ > -i c:\01.WAV^ > -i c:\02.WAV^ > -i c:\03.WAV^ > -i c:\04.WAV^ > -i c:\05.WAV^ > -i c:\06.WAV^ > -i c:\07.WAV^ > -i c:\08.WAV^ > -filter_complex > "

Re: [FFmpeg-user] MP4s (and M4As) for music

On Sun, Jun 8, 2025 at 5:47 PM Mark Filipak < markfilipak.imdb-at-gmail@ffmpeg.org> wrote: > On 08/06/2025 13.31, Paul B Mahol wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 8, 2025 at 5:27 PM Mark Filipak < > > markfilipak.imdb-at-gmail@ffmpeg.org> wrote: > > > >> F

Re: [FFmpeg-user] MP4s (and M4As) for music

On Sun, Jun 8, 2025 at 5:27 PM Mark Filipak < markfilipak.imdb-at-gmail@ffmpeg.org> wrote: > For AAC encoding of pcm_s16le, what command should I use? > > I want archival quality. > In other circles, archival quality means lossless, thus FLAC and not AAC. > _

Re: [FFmpeg-user] MP4s (and M4As) for music

On Sun, Jun 8, 2025 at 5:19 PM Mark Filipak < markfilipak.imdb-at-gmail@ffmpeg.org> wrote: > For AAC encoding of pcm_s16le, what command should I use? > There are numerous infos on web that native, ffmpeg AAC encoder is sub-optimal on low bit-rates. For above question, audio filter stack wi

Re: [FFmpeg-user] fieldmatch, documentation submission

On Tue, Jun 3, 2025 at 2:52 AM Mark Filipak wrote: > This is my first submission for improved documentation -- Paul Mahol asked > that I post suggestions > to this mailing list. > > The diagrams below are for 'fieldmatch'. > > I believe they are an inprovement for two reasons: 1, Letter tokens >

Re: [FFmpeg-user] isolate 'voices', move them, and mix into another audio stream

On Sun, Jun 1, 2025 at 6:23 PM Richard Bartczak via ffmpeg-user < ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org> wrote: > Am 01.06.25 um 17:48 schrieb Paul B Mahol: > > On Sun, Jun 1, 2025 at 3:40 PM Mark Filipak > > wrote: > > > >> I have two ac3 audio streams. One is 'voi

Re: [FFmpeg-user] isolate 'voices', move them, and mix into another audio stream

On Sun, Jun 1, 2025 at 7:42 PM Mark Filipak wrote: > On 01/06/2025 15.38, Paul B Mahol wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 1, 2025 at 7:37 PM Mark Filipak > > wrote: > > > >> On 01/06/2025 14.26, Paul B Mahol wrote: > >>>> Am 01.06.25 um 17:48 schrieb Paul B

Re: [FFmpeg-user] isolate 'voices', move them, and mix into another audio stream

On Sun, Jun 1, 2025 at 7:37 PM Mark Filipak wrote: > On 01/06/2025 14.26, Paul B Mahol wrote: > >> Am 01.06.25 um 17:48 schrieb Paul B Mahol: > >>> On Sun, Jun 1, 2025 at 3:40 PM Mark Filipak < > markfilipak.i...@gmail.com> > >>> wrote: > >>

Re: [FFmpeg-user] isolate 'voices', move them, and mix into another audio stream

On Sun, Jun 1, 2025 at 3:40 PM Mark Filipak wrote: > I have two ac3 audio streams. One is 'voices+noise', the other is just > 'noise' -- no voices. I want > to take 'voices+noise', remove 'noise' leaving just 'voices', then mix > 'voices' into a latter, > clipped version, call it 'sounds'. I coul

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Why does the 'detelecine' filter exist?

On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 4:40 PM Mark Filipak wrote: > On 29/05/2025 12.21, Paul B Mahol wrote: > > On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 4:18 PM Carl Zwanzig wrote: > > > >> On 5/28/2025 9:33 PM, Mark Filipak wrote: > >>> On 29/05/2025 00.26, Carl Zwanzig wrote: >

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Why does the 'detelecine' filter exist?

On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 4:18 PM Carl Zwanzig wrote: > On 5/28/2025 9:33 PM, Mark Filipak wrote: > > On 29/05/2025 00.26, Carl Zwanzig wrote: > >> On 5/28/2025 2:37 PM, Mark Filipak wrote: > >> There are probably extremely few instances where a name would > >> rationally > > be reused;

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Detelecine: I got the right result from the wrong command?

On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 4:03 PM Mark Filipak wrote: > On 29/05/2025 07.07, Paul B Mahol wrote: > > On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 9:46 AM Mark Filipak > > > wrote: > > > >> Oh, I should add this: When I detelecined "1492, CONQUEST OF PARADISE" > via >

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Detelecine: I got the right result from the wrong command?

On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 9:46 AM Mark Filipak wrote: > Oh, I should add this: When I detelecined "1492, CONQUEST OF PARADISE" via > the 'detelecine' filter I > got judder in panning shots. I got no judder via 'fieldmatch, decimate'. > Irrelevant. > > > On 29/05/2025 00.30, Alex Xu wrote: > > I t

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Why does the 'detelecine' filter exist?

On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 9:35 PM Mark Filipak wrote: > On 28/05/2025 17.27, Paul B Mahol wrote: > > On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 9:19 PM Mark Filipak > > > wrote: > > > >> On 28/05/2025 15.39, Alex Xu wrote: > >>> I recently used the detelecine com

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Why does the 'detelecine' filter exist?

On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 9:25 PM Mark Filipak wrote: > On 28/05/2025 16.33, Carl Zwanzig wrote: > > On 5/28/2025 12:00 PM, Mark Filipak wrote: > > > >> By continuing to carry obsolete filters, FFmpeg emasculates itself. > > > > How? > > Developers have to dream up new names because what they are d

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Why does the 'detelecine' filter exist?

On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 9:19 PM Mark Filipak wrote: > On 28/05/2025 15.39, Alex Xu wrote: > > I recently used the detelecine command in this thread: > > https://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-user/2025-May/059249.html > > > > I got strange results with the `fieldmatch+decimate` combo, where > decima

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Why does the 'detelecine' filter exist?

On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 7:07 PM Mark Filipak wrote: > On 28/05/2025 15.04, Paul B Mahol wrote: > > On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 7:00 PM Mark Filipak > > > wrote: > > > >> Why does the 'detelecine' filter exist? It is weak and clumsy. > >> >

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Why does the 'detelecine' filter exist?

On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 7:00 PM Mark Filipak wrote: > Why does the 'detelecine' filter exist? It is weak and clumsy. > > The 'fieldmatch' filter followed by 'decimate' do a better job and are > robust. > > By continuing to carry obsolete filters, FFmpeg emasculates itself. That > makes FFmpeg app

Re: [FFmpeg-user] DTS 7.1 to AC3 5.1

On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 8:30 PM Paul B Mahol wrote: > > > On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 8:22 PM Mark Filipak > wrote: > >> On 22/05/2025 16.07, Paul B Mahol wrote: >> > On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 8:01 PM Mark Filipak < >> markfilipak.i...@gmail.com> >> >

Re: [FFmpeg-user] DTS 7.1 to AC3 5.1

On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 8:22 PM Mark Filipak wrote: > On 22/05/2025 16.07, Paul B Mahol wrote: > > On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 8:01 PM Mark Filipak > > > wrote: > > > >> Hi, All, > >> > >> I've tried every trick in the documentation bu

Re: [FFmpeg-user] DTS 7.1 to AC3 5.1

On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 8:01 PM Mark Filipak wrote: > Hi, All, > > I've tried every trick in the documentation but I can't persuade FFmpeg > CLI to convert DTS 7.1 to > AC3 5.1. > > The best I get is AC3 5.0(side). > > Handbrake does it, and it uses the same libraries! I went ahead and made a > m

Re: [FFmpeg-user] [Cin] FranceBB's LUT collection

On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 6:25 PM Mark Filipak wrote: > On 16/05/2025 19.01, Andrew Randrianasulu wrote: > > пт, 16 июл. 2021 г., 09:36 Andrea paz via Cin < > c...@lists.cinelerra-gg.org>: > > > >> I made a forum post to keep track of the repository. So if a request > >> is made we can direct to th

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Colorspace, clarifications; was: [Cin] FranceBB's LUT collection

On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 4:53 PM Erik Dobberkau wrote: > > yuv420p10le(tv,bt2020nc/bt2020/smpte2084) > > \ \\ \ > > \ matrix \ transfer > >range primaries > > Is the above _always_ the correct interpretation of the order? > > >

Re: [FFmpeg-user] [Cin] FranceBB's LUT collection

On Sat, May 17, 2025 at 2:32 PM Mark Filipak wrote: > On 17/05/2025 09.45, Paul B Mahol wrote: > >>-vf lut3d=file='c\\:HLG_BT2020_to_Linear_BT709.cube' -f null - > >> > >> No option name near 'HLG_BT2020_to_Linear_BT709.cube' > >> Er

Re: [FFmpeg-user] [Cin] FranceBB's LUT collection

On Sat, May 17, 2025 at 1:39 PM Mark Filipak wrote: > On 17/05/2025 09.30, Paul B Mahol wrote: > > On Sat, May 17, 2025 at 1:20 PM Paul B Mahol wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> On Sat, May 17, 2025 at 12:21 PM Mark Filipak < > markfilipak.i...@gmail

Re: [FFmpeg-user] [Cin] FranceBB's LUT collection

On Sat, May 17, 2025 at 1:20 PM Paul B Mahol wrote: > > > On Sat, May 17, 2025 at 12:21 PM Mark Filipak > wrote: > >> On 17/05/2025 07.44, Paul B Mahol wrote: >> > On Sat, May 17, 2025 at 11:37 AM Mark Filipak < >> markfilipak.i...@gmail.com> >>

Re: [FFmpeg-user] [Cin] FranceBB's LUT collection

On Sat, May 17, 2025 at 12:21 PM Mark Filipak wrote: > On 17/05/2025 07.44, Paul B Mahol wrote: > > On Sat, May 17, 2025 at 11:37 AM Mark Filipak < > markfilipak.i...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> On 16/05/2025 21.48, Andrew Randrianasulu wrote: >

Re: [FFmpeg-user] [Cin] FranceBB's LUT collection

On Sat, May 17, 2025 at 11:37 AM Mark Filipak wrote: > On 16/05/2025 21.48, Andrew Randrianasulu wrote: > > сб, 17 мая 2025 г., 04:32 Mark Filipak : > > > >> Hi Andrew. > >> > >> On 16/05/2025 19.01, Andrew Randrianasulu wrote: > >>> пт, 16 июл. 2021 г., 09:36 Andrea paz via Cin < > >> c...@lists

Re: [FFmpeg-user] [Cin] FranceBB's LUT collection

On Sat, May 17, 2025 at 1:48 AM Andrew Randrianasulu < randrianas...@gmail.com> wrote: > сб, 17 мая 2025 г., 04:32 Mark Filipak : > > > Hi Andrew. > > > > On 16/05/2025 19.01, Andrew Randrianasulu wrote: > > > пт, 16 июл. 2021 г., 09:36 Andrea paz via Cin < > > c...@lists.cinelerra-gg.org>: > > >

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Is libplacebo only for GPUs?

On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 8:40 PM Andrew Randrianasulu < randrianas...@gmail.com> wrote: > чт, 15 мая 2025 г., 23:33 Mark Filipak : > > > If my pixel format is gbrpf32le, should I be using libplacebo? > > > > Libplacebo says, "Flexible GPU-accelerated"... > > > > What if I don't have a GPU? > > > >

Re: [FFmpeg-user] gbrpf32le in filter_complex

On Fri, May 9, 2025 at 6:50 PM Mark Filipak wrote: > I make two statements below regarding the core of the filter_complex. > I'd be grateful if you'd point out statements that are wrong. > (Of course, anything more you'd like to contribute is welcome, too.) > > In the core of filter_complex, pixe

Re: [FFmpeg-user] gbrpf32le in filter_complex

On Fri, May 9, 2025 at 7:29 PM Andrew Randrianasulu wrote: > пт, 9 мая 2025 г., 22:24 Mark Filipak : > > > On 09/05/2025 15.05, Andrew Randrianasulu wrote: > > > пт, 9 мая 2025 г., 21:50 Mark Filipak : > > > > > >> I make two statements below regarding the core of the filter_complex. > > >> I'd b

Re: [FFmpeg-user] gbrpf32le in filter_complex

On Fri, May 9, 2025 at 7:24 PM Mark Filipak wrote: > On 09/05/2025 15.05, Andrew Randrianasulu wrote: > > пт, 9 мая 2025 г., 21:50 Mark Filipak : > > > >> I make two statements below regarding the core of the filter_complex. > >> I'd be grateful if you'd point out statements that are wrong. > >>

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Help regard ffmpeg xfade transitions

On Sat, Apr 5, 2025 at 3:54 PM Abdullah Qasim wrote: > I have around 10 pictures and 12 texts in a video that I want to create > using ffmpeg in nodejs. I am testing the commands and get an issue. I want > to animate them using xfade transitions means that text and shapes appear > with some trans

Re: [FFmpeg-user] "Competitors" or do we want to stay alive?

On Fri, Apr 4, 2025 at 10:06 AM Andrew Randrianasulu < randrianas...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sorry for being frustrated lately. > > Realities of all this "modern development" vs me tend to be not in favor of > our project. > > I looked up two "other" projects in video editing. > > MLT is well-known an

Re: [FFmpeg-user] ffmpeg and dv

On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 7:11 PM Devin Heitmueller < devin.heitmuel...@ltnglobal.com> wrote: > Hi Dave, > > On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 2:51 PM Dave Rice wrote: > > - Is there any workaround to force a frame rate of an input? For > instance, could I use a non-ffmpeg tool to identify the frame rate and

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Command line to show channel label/position

Also note that still channel layouts in FFmpeg do not store/signal anywhere real channel horizontal/vertical angle. On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 4:46 PM Paul B Mahol wrote: > Search for "surround" left/channel back. To me it looks the flac decoder > is correct. > > https://da

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Command line to show channel label/position

Search for "surround" left/channel back. To me it looks the flac decoder is correct. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc9639/ On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 4:37 PM MrNice wrote: > > On 29/01/2025 11:26, Paul B Mahol wrote: > > For your specific case, one would need to look

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Command line to show channel label/position

For your specific case, one would need to look at flac specification, and check does ffmpeg follow specification correctly. On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 10:24 AM MrNice wrote: > >> On Jan 28, 2025, at 4:14 PM, MrNice wrote: > >> > >> On 28/01/2025 18:26, Carl Zwanzig wrote: > >>> On 1/28/2025 8:18 A

Re: [FFmpeg-user] af_silenceremove timestamp copy option doesn't seem to work

wav format container does not store timestamps at all. Filter works fine. On Sat, Jan 25, 2025 at 4:42 AM Justin wrote: > Hello! > > I am trying to use the *silenceremove *filter as explained in the ffmpeg > documentation. > I > wanted t

Re: [FFmpeg-user] FFMPEG SLOW (new versions)

On Thu, Jan 9, 2025 at 7:23 PM Giovanni Fast1 wrote: > Dear sirs at FFMPEG, > > I need some help and I hope this email is the right way. > > I am just a light user of ffmpeg.exe. My PC is based on a Intel Core I5, > with 8 GB ram, SSD, Windows 11; I mainly use FFMPEG to adjust the audio > level o

Re: [FFmpeg-user] OMA playback

on about the songs (artist, album, etc.)- > '00010013' is the file I sent you and has the EKB chunk in it- I don't know > what the other ones are for There's also a .XML file which shows a > 'DeviceID' and 'RelationshipID', I don't kno

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Creating MP4 with G711 audio

ffmpeg can not mux pcm_alaw/pcm_mulaw into MP4. On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 10:41 AM d.gorde...@ngslab.ru wrote: > Hello. > > I'm trying to make a mp4 file from a video/audio stream. When audio is > AAC it works fine. But I cannot pack G711U audio. > > |av_register_all(); avcodec_register_all(); > a

Re: [FFmpeg-user] OMA playback

lock will work > for all files then because that's the only one on the walkman hard drive > (that has a EKB block). > On Wednesday, November 20, 2024 at 09:37:25 AM GMT+1, Paul B Mahol < > one...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Easier would be to add support to demuxer to sea

Re: [FFmpeg-user] OMA playback

I recovered, I found a .dat file which has an EKB block in > it. Could this make things easier to reconstruct the .oma file's header and > EKB? You can find the file in attachment. > On Tuesday, November 19, 2024 at 10:16:14 PM GMT+1, Paul B Mahol < > one...@gmail.com> wr

Re: [FFmpeg-user] OMA playback

deolan.org/SoC_2011/OMA/Atrac_Improvements/Hope this helps. > Best regards, > DieterOn Wednesday, November 13, 2024 at 10:22:29 AM GMT+1, Paul B > Mahol wrote: > > Looks like ffmpeg can not process it because files lack some geob binary > chunk that it expects. > When

Re: [FFmpeg-user] sidechain compression: NOT ducking, but envelope

There is no standalone envelope filter in FFmpeg, but there is one in Librempeg. (If envelope is standard definition by audio community) If you already have smooth envelope, you can use in FFmpeg sidechaincompress filter (takes two input streams) + amix filter. I could help more if I can look at

Re: [FFmpeg-user] OMA playback

gt; > > > > On Tuesday, November 12, 2024 at 11:10:30 PM GMT+1, Paul B Mahol < > one...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I get Access denied. So needs some permissions change to actually download > file(s). > > On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 10:40 PM Dieter Van Hauwermeiren v

Re: [FFmpeg-user] OMA playback

google.com/file/d/1pQkvSAx5GaCARI7WnHHNW4uDhcHBwSZy/view?usp=drive_linkhttps://drive.google.com/file/d/1-peYBsAhYHCgFgqNCqjkx-Ij1NXvOWI3/view?usp=drive_linkhttps://drive.google.com/file/d/1iJFrFGSjtG7JNGZTpjcJRWW3d21ZrwfL/view?usp=drive_link > On Tuesday, November 12, 2024 at 10:22:38 PM

Re: [FFmpeg-user] OMA playback

On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 8:59 PM Dieter Van Hauwermeiren via ffmpeg-user < ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org> wrote: > Hi, > I have a question regarding the playback of .OMA files with ffmpeg.The > .OMA files I would like to play come from a recovered hard disk from a Sony > NW-HD1 walkman. These files were a

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Record multiple channel audio from Focusrite Scarlett 18i8

On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 11:08 AM Stuart Robinson wrote: > > As in the title I am wondering if it is possible to record all inputs from > my focusrite to separate mono tracks. > > ffmpeg -sources dshow > > just shows > > [analogue 1 + 2 (audio)] > > despite the device having 18 inputs (I don't care

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Record multiple channel audio from Focusrite Scarlett 18i8

On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 2:45 PM Stuart Robinson wrote: > > > As in the title I am wondering if it is possible to record all inputs > from > > my focusrite to separate mono tracks. > > > > ffmpeg -sources dshow > > > > just shows > > > > [analogue 1 + 2 (audio)] > > > > despite the device having 18

Re: [FFmpeg-user] zscale and scale with HDR video

On Sat, Oct 26, 2024 at 2:15 PM Oliver Fromme wrote: > I've got a question for the experts ... > > So far I have successfully used zscale for scaling HDR video, > because it is supposed to be better suited for HDR than the > regular scale filter. > > However, I'm now in a situation where I need t

Re: [FFmpeg-user] yuvtestsrc to y4m differs with and without format rgba->yuv444p conversion

On Sun, Sep 8, 2024 at 8:07 PM Andrew Randrianasulu wrote: > On Sun, Sep 8, 2024 at 9:02 PM Paul B Mahol wrote: > > > > On Sun, Sep 8, 2024 at 7:49 AM Andrew Randrianasulu < > randrianas...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > git up to d9f594209fb1a

Re: [FFmpeg-user] yuvtestsrc to y4m differs with and without format rgba->yuv444p conversion

On Sun, Sep 8, 2024 at 7:49 AM Andrew Randrianasulu wrote: > git up to d9f594209fb1a9c87017034f943dcb311a9d2896 > > first command > > > bash-5.1$ /dev/shm/ffmpeg/ffmpeg -f lavfi -i yuvtestsrc -frames 1 -r > 25 -vf format=rgba,format=yuv444p -color_range 1 > /dev/shm/yuv-mpeg-rgba-yuv444p.y4

Re: [FFmpeg-user] The future of video

On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 10:16 PM Carl Zwanzig wrote: > On 7/17/2024 12:43 PM, Mark Filipak wrote: > >> frame; some projectors would use a three-blade shutter to get > >> supposedly smoother-looking motion. > > > Actually, z!, a double or triple shutter doesn't improve motion. It > > reduces/elimi

Re: [FFmpeg-user] v360 filter output eac resolution

On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 4:04 AM Jimmie wrote: > Hi, > > I'm currently working on a project about Equi-Angular Cubemap (EAC). > > I need to sample an EAC texture but couldn't find one readily available. > After some googling, I found that FFmpeg could be used to convert > other 360 pictures to EAC

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Reordering frames in corrupt GoPro videos

On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 12:43 AM Mark Filipak wrote: > On 11/07/2024 18.05, Vincent Deconinck wrote: > > Hi, > > > > A few months ago, my GoPro randomly started creating some corrupt (or > > partly-corrupt) video files, mixing up frames and causing jaggy > playback.To > > illustrate the case, her

Re: [FFmpeg-user] forced-idr -- 3 more tired

On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 11:18 PM Mark Filipak wrote: > On 10/07/2024 13.51, Will Boba wrote: > > On 7/10/24 10:26, Mark Filipak wrote: > >> Three more tried. > >> > >> ffmpeg -forced-idr 1 -i ... -c:v libx264 -an -sn -start_at_zero > -muxdelay 0 ... > >> [in#0 @ 00542d00] Error opening in

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Noise generator for 360° video

On Sat, Jul 6, 2024 at 10:54 AM Michael Koch wrote: > Am 06.07.2024 um 10:44 schrieb Paul B Mahol: > > On Sat, Jul 6, 2024 at 10:40 AM Michael Koch < > astroelectro...@t-online.de> > > wrote: > > > >> Does anybody have an idea how to make a noise gene

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Noise generator for 360° video

On Sat, Jul 6, 2024 at 10:40 AM Michael Koch wrote: > Does anybody have an idea how to make a noise generator for 360° video? > I mean noise (clouds, waves) that looks similar in all directions of the > sphere. If I use the new "perlin" source for making an equirectangular > video, there are two

Re: [FFmpeg-user] green bar at bottom of video

On Sat, Jul 6, 2024 at 9:23 AM Michael Koch wrote: > Hi, > > when I run this command, the output video has a green bar at the bottom > when played with VLC player. > But it plays fine with FFplay or PotPlayer . Is this a bug in FFmpeg or > in VLC? > VLC > > ffmpeg -f lavfi -i color=gray:size=6

Re: [FFmpeg-user] the trim filter

On Fri, Jul 5, 2024 at 7:29 PM Mark Filipak wrote: > On 05/07/2024 07.54, Paul B Mahol wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 5, 2024 at 2:09 AM Mark Filipak > > wrote: > > > >> On 04/07/2024 17.12, Paul B Mahol wrote: > >>> Its in documentation: asetpts=N/SR/TB, ass

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >