вт, 9 янв. 2024 г., 11:35 Mark Filipak :
> On 1/8/24 01:46, Andrew Randrianasulu wrote:
> > пн, 8 янв. 2024 г., 09:13 Mark Filipak :
> >
> >> On 1/8/24 00:26, Andrew Randrianasulu wrote:
> >>> пн, 8 янв. 2024 г., 05:14 Mark Filipak :
> What is it that you want to know?
> >>>
> >>> I think I
On 1/8/24 01:46, Andrew Randrianasulu wrote:
пн, 8 янв. 2024 г., 09:13 Mark Filipak :
On 1/8/24 00:26, Andrew Randrianasulu wrote:
пн, 8 янв. 2024 г., 05:14 Mark Filipak :
What is it that you want to know?
I think I like to try and see bigger picture behind acronyms.
What acronyms?
On 1/8/24 01:46, Andrew Randrianasulu wrote:
Well, here lies the problem for us!
Ffmpeg (command line utility) encodes those files straight away, so for
example VLC displays them correctly. But our software (cinelerra-gg) so far
was not setting st->sample_aspect_ratio so say webm encodes were
пн, 8 янв. 2024 г., 09:13 Mark Filipak :
> On 1/8/24 00:26, Andrew Randrianasulu wrote:
> > пн, 8 янв. 2024 г., 05:14 Mark Filipak :
> >> What is it that you want to know?
> >>
> >
> > I think I like to try and see bigger picture behind acronyms.
>
> What acronyms?
>
SAR, DAR, PAR .
> >
On 1/8/24 00:26, Andrew Randrianasulu wrote:
пн, 8 янв. 2024 г., 05:14 Mark Filipak :
What is it that you want to know?
I think I like to try and see bigger picture behind acronyms.
What acronyms?
At least this page explains how some 640*480 files might be born (it
should be 486, but
пн, 8 янв. 2024 г., 05:14 Mark Filipak :
> On 1/7/24 17:34, Andrew Randrianasulu wrote:
> >
> > Well, we (cinelerra-gg users/hackers/maintainers) run into aspect ratio
> > issues too , and I tried to demistify it for myself ... only to run into
> > much more complex explanation at
> >
> >
On 1/7/24 17:34, Andrew Randrianasulu wrote:
Well, we (cinelerra-gg users/hackers/maintainers) run into aspect ratio
issues too , and I tried to demistify it for myself ... only to run into
much more complex explanation at
https://lurkertech.com/lg/pixelaspect/
I'm sorry, I couldn't get past
чт, 28 дек. 2023 г., 08:54 Kieran O Leary :
> Hi Mark
>
> On Wed 27 Dec 2023 at 08:53, Mark Filipak
> wrote:
>
> > On 12/27/23 01:58, Kieran O Leary wrote:
> > > On Tue 26 Dec 2023 at 22:53, Mark Filipak
> > >> Oh, no! Mister Billipedia! Hahahaha... (where people who are as ill
> > >> informed
Hi Mark
On Wed 27 Dec 2023 at 08:53, Mark Filipak
wrote:
> On 12/27/23 01:58, Kieran O Leary wrote:
> > On Tue 26 Dec 2023 at 22:53, Mark Filipak
> >> Oh, no! Mister Billipedia! Hahahaha... (where people who are as ill
> >> informed as you are, get to
> >> pontificate)
> >
> >
> > I think you
This is important to me. I sent it yesterday, but from the wrong account, so it wasn't accepted by
ffmpeg-user. If you somehow got 2 of them, please accept my apology. (Between TBird's quirks and
Gmail's quirks, email is driving me nuts.)
On 12/27/23 01:58, Kieran O Leary wrote:
On Tue 26 Dec
This is important to me. I sent it yesterday, but from the wrong account, so it didn't get to
ffmpeg-user. If you somehow got 2 of them, please accept my apology.
On 12/27/23 01:58, Kieran O Leary wrote:
On Tue 26 Dec 2023 at 22:53, Mark Filipak
Oh, no! Mister Billipedia! Hahahaha... (where
On 12/27/23 01:58, Kieran O Leary wrote:
On Tue 26 Dec 2023 at 22:53, Mark Filipak
Oh, no! Mister Billipedia! Hahahaha... (where people who are as ill
informed as you are, get to
pontificate)
I think you must have misread the tone of Devin’s email, and I would hardly
call him ill informed.
On Tue 26 Dec 2023 at 22:53, Mark Filipak
wrote:
> On 12/26/23 15:30, Devin Heitmueller wrote:
> > Hi Mark,
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 26, 2023 at 2:58 PM Mark Filipak
> wrote:
> >> Oops. Sorry. SAR for 16:9 DVD is 32/27. PAR is 3/2.
> >>
> >> You brought up 40/33. That's a PAR? A PAR for what?
> >
>
On 12/26/23 15:30, Devin Heitmueller wrote:
Hi Mark,
On Tue, Dec 26, 2023 at 2:58 PM Mark Filipak wrote:
Oops. Sorry. SAR for 16:9 DVD is 32/27. PAR is 3/2.
You brought up 40/33. That's a PAR? A PAR for what?
In this context SAR (Sample Aspect Ratio) and PAR (Pixel Aspect Ratio)
are
On 12/26/23 16:03, Bouke / edit 'B wrote:
On 26 Dec 2023, at 21:13, Mark Filipak wrote:
How about stopping trolling if you know it all?
The ‘imdb’ in your mail address makes you an even bigger jerk.
It was a left over account from when imdb ended its forum. It means nothing.
For a long
> On 26 Dec 2023, at 21:13, Mark Filipak wrote:
How about stopping trolling if you know it all?
The ‘imdb’ in your mail address makes you an even bigger jerk.
Bouke
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
Hi Mark,
On Tue, Dec 26, 2023 at 2:58 PM Mark Filipak wrote:
> Oops. Sorry. SAR for 16:9 DVD is 32/27. PAR is 3/2.
>
> You brought up 40/33. That's a PAR? A PAR for what?
In this context SAR (Sample Aspect Ratio) and PAR (Pixel Aspect Ratio)
are equivalent. Unfortunately the use of the term
On 12/26/23 14:37, Kieran O Leary wrote:
Hi
On Tue 26 Dec 2023 at 17:25, Carl Zwanzig wrote:
On 12/25/2023 1:04 AM, Mark Filipak wrote:
Huh? "720x480 video with a display aspect ratio of 16:9" is what's on
most
'NTSC' DVDs.
Huh? The vast majority of DVDs I've handled were 4:3 then
On 12/26/23 09:30, Devin Heitmueller wrote:
On Mon, Dec 25, 2023 at 4:04 AM Mark Filipak
wrote:
On 12/22/23 16:09, Devin Heitmueller wrote:
On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 3:57 PM Mark Filipak
wrote:
On 12/22/23 15:14, Devin Heitmueller wrote:
On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 2:38 PM Mark Filipak <
Hi
On Tue 26 Dec 2023 at 17:25, Carl Zwanzig wrote:
> On 12/25/2023 1:04 AM, Mark Filipak wrote:
> >
> > Huh? "720x480 video with a display aspect ratio of 16:9" is what's on
> most
> > 'NTSC' DVDs.
>
> Huh? The vast majority of DVDs I've handled were 4:3 then maybe
> letterboxed
> to only show
On 12/25/2023 1:04 AM, Mark Filipak wrote:
Huh? "720x480 video with a display aspect ratio of 16:9" is what's on most
'NTSC' DVDs.
Huh? The vast majority of DVDs I've handled were 4:3 then maybe letterboxed
to only show some wide-screen size (like 2.33:1). Only more recent content
was shot
On Mon, Dec 25, 2023 at 4:04 AM Mark Filipak
wrote:
> On 12/22/23 16:09, Devin Heitmueller wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 3:57 PM Mark Filipak
> wrote:
> >> On 12/22/23 15:14, Devin Heitmueller wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 2:38 PM Mark Filipak <
> markfilipak.i...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 12/22/23 16:09, Devin Heitmueller wrote:
On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 3:57 PM Mark Filipak wrote:
On 12/22/23 15:14, Devin Heitmueller wrote:
On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 2:38 PM Mark Filipak wrote:
This page: https://ffmpeg.org/ffmpeg-utils.html
'says' this:
"The following abbreviations are
Hi Devin,
On 12/22/23 15:14, Devin Heitmueller wrote:
On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 2:38 PM Mark Filipak wrote:
This page: https://ffmpeg.org/ffmpeg-utils.html
'says' this:
"The following abbreviations are recognized:
"‘sntsc’
"640x480"
What is it? I'm not aware that any such thing exists.
On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 3:57 PM Mark Filipak wrote:
>
> Hi Devin,
>
> On 12/22/23 15:14, Devin Heitmueller wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 2:38 PM Mark Filipak
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> This page: https://ffmpeg.org/ffmpeg-utils.html
> >> 'says' this:
> >>
> >> "The following abbreviations are
Hi Devin,
On 12/22/23 15:14, Devin Heitmueller wrote:
On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 2:38 PM Mark Filipak wrote:
This page: https://ffmpeg.org/ffmpeg-utils.html
'says' this:
"The following abbreviations are recognized:
"‘sntsc’
"640x480"
What is it? I'm not aware that any such thing exists.
On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 2:38 PM Mark Filipak wrote:
>
> This page: https://ffmpeg.org/ffmpeg-utils.html
> 'says' this:
>
> "The following abbreviations are recognized:
> "‘sntsc’
> "640x480"
>
> What is it? I'm not aware that any such thing exists.
It's NTSC with square pixels (as opposed to
This page: https://ffmpeg.org/ffmpeg-utils.html
'says' this:
"The following abbreviations are recognized:
"‘sntsc’
"640x480"
What is it? I'm not aware that any such thing exists.
--Mark.
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
28 matches
Mail list logo
