I know this subject has come up before but I'll ask again anyway - are there
any decent and reasonably cheap image databases out there? I already have
hundreds (thousands?) of scanned images which I need to index and sort so
I can find them. The database needs to be able to index a CD so it can
No problem.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 2:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Side Step, Have a question
Thanks this is good news to me, I am rally inept when it
I have yet to test this. I do have some uncut rolls and a real job that
interferes with my scanning time.
As soon as I figure this out, I will post it.
Spencer Stone
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bob Shomler
Sent: Wednesday, November
My expertise, with regard to components of resolution, pretty much stops
at the image plain. There are quite a few on this list that are far more
qualified to address the film issues. Wish I knew more.
Jim
Chris McBrien wrote:
> James,
> thank you very much for that very clear and c
Bob has anyone done a review on the rfs3600 yet? Or any first hand
experience using it?
Dave Small
>They have a quick start guide, but no manual. It is a
>.pdf. I LIKE paper in this respect.
Is it too large to print?
>If you have any specific questions, feel free to e-mail me.
I read an inquiry some time back asking if it could accept an uncut
roll of 37 frames (spec'd for 36). Can you t
Thanks this is good news to me, I am rally inept when it comes to try and
correct anything through Photoshop. Sounds like I can finally show my film
the way I intended to when I made my original exposures. I like getting back
to basic and not manipulative photography. Thanks for your firsthand
Just got one from B&H. So far, I am very impressed. All the color negs and
reversal that I have put through it have turned out beautifully without a
hint of color correction in photoshop. I am afraid, though, that they
slacked a little on their black and white film profiles to get this thing to
> Conventional wisdom says that the eye can resolve between 6 to 8 lppm at
> normal viewing distance.
> (What that is, I don't know. For someone as myopic as myself, it's only
> about 6" without glasses!)
> Sooo. 2700 ppi is 106 pixels per millimetre, divide by 8 = 13.25, and
> divide by 2 (line *
Just received in the US Mails, a brochure on the Kodak Pro, RFS 3600 Film
Scanner. Is there any feedback on this piece of equipment here? WRGill,
Carmel, California
I just released VueScan 6.3.11 for Windows, Linux and Mac OS.
It can be downloaded from:
http://www.hamrick.com/vsm.html
What's new in version 6.3.11:
* Fixed problem with infrared channel on the
Minolta Scan Elite
* Fixed problems with some scanners on Mac OS
(especially loading
Hi,
I've been using the Minolta Scan Dual II scanner for about 2.5 months now and
it mostly works fine. However when I scan (mildly) underexposed negatives the
resulting scans are horribly "grainy" and sometimes contain some color banding.
Two example scans can be found on:
http://www.insun.cis
Hi Jerry.
> > However, when I recalibrated my screen using the 6 squares of the (I believe
> > www.photoscientia.co.uk) photoscientia website instead of the 3 squares of
> > the adobe gamma or basic wiziwyg profiling tool, I got better colors in
> > general, even though the squares of the latter
Hi Chris.
> > At risk of starting World War 3, what is the resolution of Chemical
> > Film?
Was this an idle enquiry, or is it meant to imply some comparison with pixels and
digital
images?
Since it's aimed at this list, and not on Photonet or Philip Greenspun's BB, I suspect
you really want
Bob,
I don't know first hand but will ask.
David
-Original Message-
From: Robert E. Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2000 10:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: filmscanners: Scanning Polachrome slides
What experience is out there regarding scanning Polachr
Thanks for the clarification.
>I am trying to say, because colour neg films all have different types of
orange base fog, the various software have to make colour adjustments to
correct for this, B/W NEG has no such colour in its base, and if you tell
the software, that B/W neg is a colour film, i
I've attached a rough list of the things I'm thinking about
doing to VueScan, and I'd appreciate it if people would
send me e-mail (not posting to this list, but e-mailing
directly to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) with their top 5 priority
list. This will help me prioritize the things people want.
I'll sum
James,
thank you very much for that very clear and concise
explanation. Could you possibly add something about film speed and
grain size as I find this affects scan quality when using say 64 ASA
in the Summer and 400 ASA in the Winter.
Regards Chris MCBrien.
- Original Message -
In a message dated 11/14/2000 5:50:54 PM EST,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Am I being naive here or does the settings for colour film take into
> account, neutralizing the orange mask on the film base
Scanning black/white film with VueScan is very similar to
scanning color negative film. VueSc
> -Original Message-
> From: photoscientia [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2000 10:31 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: filmscanners: Prints using Acer ScanWit
>
> Hi Geoff
>
> Geoff Stafford wrote:
>
> > I have an Acer ScanWit 2720S.
> >
> > Rece
The trick is to get the focus right,otherwise you get problems with the
linestructure. i think you have to go to polaroid to get the
instructionmanual. Think I´ve been told that the focus should be behind the
emolutionlayers.I guess depht of field on your scanner do matter .Best luck
from Erlend
Thank you for all your replies.
I will tell more on some of the parts in which I didn't express myself
clearly and risk the danger of becoming even more unclear:
* I scan the negative film, not the print.
* XP2 seems to have a 'purple' mask instead of an orange mask.
* I was mo
The trick is to get the focus right,otherwise you get problems with the
linestructure. i think you have to go to polaroid to get the
instructionmanual. Think I´ve been told that the focus should be behind the
emolutionlayers.I guess depht of field on your scanner do matter .Best luck
from Erlend
23 matches
Mail list logo
