[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Quoton) wrote:
Michael Wilkinson wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "IronWorks" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: Ok - I was confused. I was referring to 100 MHz DIMMs v. 133 MHz
DIMMs. I
: take it Win2K works fine with 100 MHz DIMMs?
Poor old Bill seems to be getting a lot of undeserved flak here!
If Photoshop isn't using large fonts properly it's obviously Adobe to
blame.
There are still too many Mac-like features in Photoshop on the PC. I
especially dislike that nonsense about having to set how much memory it
uses, and
The essence of dual processors is that individual actions may take the
same time, but you can do more simultaneously.
The NT execution scenario is the thread, which is an independent flow of
control. With two processors you can run two threads simultaneously, it's
as simple as that.
If the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] () wrote:
In a message dated 03/07/2001 6:42:23 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Just in case it hasn't been stated clearly, Win98SE, WinME and Win2K
all
use the same colour management system.
Rob
I was just getting ready to run out and
Mark T. wrote:
Sorry to give you the bad news, but if you surf around with java/javascript
on, site counters will gather the following information and report it back
to the site owner:
- Your browser and version no.
- Your operating system
- Your resolution and color depth
- Your
Frank Paris wrote:
All of that can be handled, since you can specify large icons, etc.
Frank Paris
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684
Does using "large icons" also increase menu and tool sizes within a
program, like Photoshop? Inquiring minds want to
Austin Franklin wrote:
Most people who never used one are confused completely about what
Amiga was.
No, it wasn't a grown-up Atari,
Hardware/architecture wise it sure was. The Atari was the first such
machine to have custom processors (four) designed specifically to handle
Hi!
I would prefer that vuescan be optimized for the higher resolutions, or
better yet, there be a way to switch between optimizations (something in
vuescan.ini, for example).
I run 1600x1200 on my work computer and on my home Internet and general
purpose computer, but since my wife prefers the
Hi, Ed!
I would like to second the suggestion about allowing the reversal of the
order of scan. To be able to type in 6-1 and have it scan positions 6, 5,
4, 3, 2, 1 would be a good thing. Better yet, being able to type in the
actual desired order of scans would be wonderful!
Speaking of
Collin Ong wrote:
On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Arthur Entlich wrote:
Collin Ong wrote:
I believe that the main culprit is the totally nonsensical scan order, as
you pointed out. The SDII scans frames from out to in, which maximizes
the time the frames spend exposed to the environment.
Laurie Solomon wrote:
Most people are using 17" monitors these days,
which is the sweet spot in the pricing structure right now
Not in my neck of the woods. Actually, at least where I live, 19" monitors
are the current popular models and tend to be the sweet spot in terms of
pricing.
Michael Wilkinson wrote:
Hi Eli,
We have been dual booting utilising separate hard drives between NT4 and
Win 2k.
Its not caused any problems to date and enables us ,as you rightly
mention,to run "Old" peripherals successfully.
With Ram prices so low I can not understand why everyone
Please do run a survey, and post the results. I'll happily admit I'm
wrong if I am.
Until 12 months ago, I ran my system on a 13-14" monitor (we use
different measurements in Canada, they are based upon the visible
display rather than the size of the CRT) originally running 640 x 480,
then
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Derek Clarke
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2001 3:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Puzzled about display resolution
Poor old Bill seems to be getting a lot of undeserved flak here!
Now for something completely different:
what is the difference between the Scan Dual II and Scan Dual II White? Both
come up after a search of cdnet and znet, with the White version being about
$50 more. It may be the Genuine Fractals software, but I'm not sure. If GF
is the extra amount,
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2001 5:25 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Anyone using Win2K? Does is manage color like
W98SE?
I don't run a business or NT
What are the correct Vuescan "Media" tab settings for Fujicolor Professional 400 NPH
color negative film?
Vuescan: 6.7.5 (test)
Scanner: HP Photosmart C5100A (SCSI)
Fuji Pro 400 NPH: http://www.fujifilm.com/AF3-865E.pdf
--
Regards,
Joe
Robert Kehl wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Arthur Entlich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 9:18 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Puzzled about display resolution
You are making a number of assumptions which may not hold true for many
Hi, Lynn!
I am getting flashbacks from my early computer days! I bought an Atari ST
back in 1985 shortly after they came out, and learned a great deal about
computers and programming with it. The GEM (not related to the scanning
GEM) GUI was a really nice windows desktop UI that I wish had
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Clark Guy
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2001 6:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Puzzled about display resolution
Hi!
Is it possible to write the software to detect the resolution
I'm not sure the Kodak RFS3600 is supported by Vuescan - check the archives,
something in the back of my memory rings.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Arthur Entlich" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2001 6:16 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Vuescan
|
|
Rob Geraghty wrote:
Art wrote:
Does Win 2K require a 133mHz motherboard bus? Can WIN 2K run on a
Celeron system CPU which uses a 66mHz bus?
Win2K doesn't require any particular bus speed. It's just a Microsoft recommendation
- making sure you buy upgrades from their friends at
Rick Berk wrote:
Hey Ed-
I just got the Kodak RFS 3600, and was interested in giving Vuescan a try,
but I went to the website and was hoping to see some screen shots or
something... any chance you could add some? I'd just like to know what I can
expect... Also, does anyone have any
Austin Franklin wrote:
Most people who never used one are confused completely about what
Amiga was.
No, it wasn't a grown-up Atari,
Hardware/architecture wise it sure was. The Atari was the first such
machine to have custom processors (four) designed specifically
to
Hi!
As long as I'm here ;-)... I'd like to ask if anyone has been able to
purchase accessory film holders from anywhere. I expect that Minolta parts
department might, but it would be likely to be at list price. Is there a
source of Minolta film holders (particularly the medium format holder)
2) It will use as much RAM as you can pack on a board. Windows 98 and ME
can't really use more RAM than about 256M effectively, but W2K can go all
the way :-)
Can you elaborate on win98's inability to use larger RAM (or refer me to some
discussion on this)?
Thanks.
--
Bob Shomler
It is:
http://www.creativepro.com/story/feature/11242.html?cprose=139
Go to www.creativepro.com and do a search for "Out of Gamut:" or
"Bruce Fraser", you will find a series of articles on Photoshop and
calibration.
Photoshop ships with a software monitor calibrator which is better
than
Frank writes ...
Photoshop is really not a consumer-level product,
and truly does benefit from Windows 2000.
...
According to threads at the Adobe forum, this fact is highly
dependent on how well Win2k runs with your hardware drivers, and
marginal at best. Win98se is better
In my ongoing hunt for a scanner that suits my needs I'm considering a used
Umax Mirage II. This is the recently discontinued tabloid size dual lens
model (700x1400 and 1400x2800 dpi). The tabloid size would really be nice
for scans of my 60" long negs and prints, and the 1400dpi would be nice
Adobe has officially announced PS6.01
http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/main.html ...
... and I notice the file size is exactly the same as the
"unofficial" release (leastwize, the install for Windows). I am
awaiting the official word on any need to update again.
shAf :o)
Just received from the man ...
shAf :o)
-Original Message-
From: Marc Pawliger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
From: "shAf" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
William writes ...
The photoshop update is officially at
http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/880a.htm
I see the file size is
A common work model for using dual monitors with Photoshop is to keep the image on the
primary (and calibrated) screen and put Photoshop's palettes and adjustment working
screen space on the second.
--
Bob Shomler
http://www.shomler.com/gallery.htm
Frank Paris wrote:
Oh, did I mention your monitor will probably burn out sooner at that
screen mode?
Why? Because it's running at a higher frequencies? That's like saying a 33
Mhz Pentium will last longer than a 900 MHz Pentium III.
Well, it just might, actually ;-)
What I've found
Just in case it hasn't been stated clearly, Win98SE, WinME and Win2K all
use the same colour management system.
This may have been addressed before, and if so I missed it or it didn't
quite register:
I've heard (but haven't seen it written definitively) that when Photoshop
installs, it sets up
Given the way dual PC systems with OSs that support dual monitors work, it
not only is the common way - or even the preferred way; it appears to be the
only way. :-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bob Shomler
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2001
A particular operation like rendering will only go faster if the
application has been specifically coded to chop the process into a number
of lumps that can be calculated independently. Then you can start all
those lumps off at the same time in separate threads and NT or W2K will
handle the way
Not in my experience; it only increases menu and tool sizes in the OS
interface and maybe Microsoft applications. A number of independent
applications have fixed menu and tool sizes built into their programs which
adjust with the changes in resolution but not with changes in the OS
settings for
Quoton wrote:
No problem with my old machine with PC-100 memory. I don't believe it will
have any problem with PC-66 systems. But honestly Pc-66 systems are very SLOW
comparing to PC-133 systems.
Quoton
My Mainboard is 133 bus, but at the time I bought it and put my system
together
My neck is located in East Central Illinois. If you look at all the
pre-packaged systems advertised in the newspapers and in catalogs, they are
offered with 17" monitors with 19" being the upgrade; but they have been
changing to making 19" monitors the standard monitor offering rather the
17."
Lynn writes ...
I've heard (but haven't seen it written definitively)
that when Photoshop installs, it sets up its own
color management system. Does this new color
management:
o 1)take over or supplant Windows' color management?
Windows does not manage color, but does recognize
I had installed the "unofficial" release of the 6.01 upgrade on three
computers. Two had no problem but on the third, my fastest and most
powerful, I was unable to access the color picker in the text dialogue
menu. The text was only red, as in the "quick mask" red. I therefore had to
Thanks for the heads up shAf. I sure hope this fixes my problem with
Photoshop bogging down. I've had to erase the .psp files every few
days to get it back to normal speed.
Regards,
-Nick T.
shAf wrote:
Adobe has officially announced PS6.01
but I went to the website and was hoping to see some screen shots or
something... any chance you could add some?
I think it would improve the html manual if it included screen shots of both
the menus and the tabbed regions. Somehow having a picture to look at
clarifies things for me. I
Rodger,
Polaroid tries to
maintain a high level of customer satisfaction but sometimes things fall
between the cracks. Unfortunately the crack you fell into was unusually large. Please
let me know when you receive the new scanner and if everything is to your
satisfaction.
My presence on
Derek, does this mean that a program that isn't specifically written for
dual processors won't *use* dual processors? That would mean that older
programs aren't going to be improved by the higher technology. How
up-to-speed are current developers on that angle?
I'm not Derek, but I'll answer
What are the correct Vuescan "Media" tab settings for Fujicolor
Professional 400 NPH color negative film?
Vuescan: 6.7.5 (test)
Scanner: HP Photosmart C5100A (SCSI)
Fuji Pro 400 NPH: http://www.fujifilm.com/AF3-865E.pdf
I've long used just Vuescan's Generic Color Negative, with default white
Does anyone know
anything about Dicomed Imaginator? (sp?)
Heard it was good
high end (windows) image editing software
Or what about Qimage
pro?
any opinions on
these PS alternatives?
thanks,
PG
I had installed the "unofficial" release of the 6.01 upgrade on three
computers. Two had no problem but on the third, my fastest and most
powerful, I was unable to access the color picker in the text dialogue
menu. The text was only red, as in the "quick mask" red. I therefore had
to
I can confirm the 2GB split between OS and App RAM. It is something to
do with the Alpha port of NT I think and to keep things consistent for
the coders, Microsoft translated the Alpha restriction to the Pentium
version. I believe W2K has the same problem but I don't think there is
an Alpha port
Like I said, it could have been anything. Fortunately the new install is
working fine.
Larry
The Windoze version did not change while the unofficial Mac version is
different from the official Mac version. This is according to Adobe.
:::
Larry Berman
Web Sites for Artists:
How many of you with dual monitors also use a tablet instead of (or in
addition to) a mouse? If you use a tablet, how well does it work with dual
monitors? Is it workable, or only workable with one of the two monitors?
Daniel Weise
A Satisfied 1600x1200x16 at 72Hz user since 1995.
An
I think anyone that's using dual monitors on a graphics system is using a
tablet also. It offers much more control than a mouse.
The drivers for your tablet have to support dual monitors. All current
Wacom drivers do and have for the past year. My 6x8 is comfortable enough
across both
I may have known once, but I can't remember what a CLI is.
Hersch
At 10:32 PM 03/07/2001 -0800, you wrote:
Jim Snyder wrote:
But, a properly designed program usually uses speed keys for the buttons
anyway, and location is not a concern. I have yet to meet many users that
don't
I think one year back Microsoft stopped support to Alpha.
There is no Win2000 on Alpha.
Bye
Ramesh
-Original Message-
From: Mark Edmonds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2001 12:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: RE: Win2k and application RAM
I
I use dual 21" monitors and a 6x8" Wacom stylus tablet on Win2K and
have done the same on Macs. Works great.
I have always hated mice. I use a trackball in addition to the
tablet. I would have had to quit my job after a couple of months if I had to
use a mouse all day.
From: Hersch Nitikman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I may have known once, but I can't remember what a CLI is.
CLI = Command Line Interface
_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
I don't think there is an alpha port, no. The split comes originally from
the MIPS version of NT though, not Alpha.
mike
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mark Edmonds
Sent: 09 March 2001 20:13
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
I'll venture another dumb question. Regarding the dual
monitors, if the primary is for the image(s) and the secondary is for the
palettes and tool bars, why worry about an imperfect color match? I would
think that an eyeball setting of the secondary should be plenty good
enough.
Hersch
At 08:47
Ever since FAT32 came out, I've given up on NTFS for all but drives that
need the extra security.
Frank Paris
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of shAf
Sent: Friday, March
Well, as it turns out, it was user brain damage on the part of my friend.
The new drivers work. He was finally able to get them to work under Windows
2000: two different monitors at two different resolutions. I asked him what
was wrong before and all he would tell me was that he was being stupid.
Arthur Entlich wrote:
Lastly, even if
my video card and monitor can produce 1600 x 1200 pixel screen, I'd be
unlikely to use it that way, due to the way it would shrink icons,
cursor and tool sizes on a 17" screen.
I think the sweetspot is now at 19". My wife, who uses her PC mostly
for
Arthur Entlich wrote:
My Mainboard is 133 bus, but at the time I bought it and put my system
together Celerons were the best deal. I'll probably upgrade to a
Pentium III soon, and upgrade some of the memory which is PC 100 (some
is PC133) to PC 133. When I do that I might move to Win
YES You are right .
It's 10 years ago when I switched to this system.
I am not able any more to use the dumb mouse !
Sincerely.
Ezio
www.lucenti.com e-photography site
- Original Message -
From: "Frank Paris" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2001
63 matches
Mail list logo
