At 15:31 22/03/2001 -0800, you wrote:
I am doing this in the public forum, because I want it witnessed.
I am formally requesting from the list owner, Tony Sleep, that "Dicky"
Richard Corbett be permanently removed from this list. I have never, in
the years I have been on this list made such a
At 05:40 22/03/2001 -0800, you wrote:
What Ed needs
is someone to write his documentation and to screen his email. But, this
would probably require raising the price of VueScan and eventually becoming
just like most other software developers. Which do you want? I would
rather Ed consecrate
What do you guys expect from Nikon's new upcoming scanner LS40 ?
Should I wait or should I buy Canons FS2710 or even the older Nikon
LS30 ? Is the gain in density from 3.2 to 3.6 (in ls40) worth
waiting and the exta money? Do I really need dpi of 2900 compared to
dpi of 2700 ?
I'm
At 13:09 22/03/2001 -0500, you wrote:
Has Ed left this list? I hope not. But, please, think for a moment before
you follow Art Entlich's lead in condemning Ed.
I wish to defend Art accused of masterminding Ed's departure. There was
nothing wrong with Art's statement, I support it fully. We
At 06:54 22/03/2001 -0700, you wrote:
That's what I thought as well and the minilab I used is one that (to the
naked eye) runs a clean process... however, what I noticed was that the grain
pattern in large areas of uniform density was much tighter and smoother in the
film from the custom
On Wed, 21 Mar 2001 12:32:03 -0600 Laurie Solomon ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
Since the topic has come up on each and every list I belong to at one time
or another in a recurring manner, I have decided to respond to your post in
private because I think that there are a few things you should
First of all, I have been too busy over the past few days to have monitored
what has been happening here. I only just caught up, and I apologise for not
having stepped in earlier.
Once again, some OT threads have assumed a life of their own. All I can do here
is ask for some self-restraint.
On Thu, 22 Mar 2001 13:24:56 +1030 Mark Thomas ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
It may be a pipe-dream, but I figure that as *I* can easily
recognise and describe the difference between grain-aliasing and real image
information, there should be a way for a programming technique or plug-in
to
On Thu, 22 Mar 2001 22:13:49 - Dicky ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Nikon are haveing development problems with their software.
This message has saved your bacon for now, demonstrating that you do have
something useful to contribute after all. Please continue in this vein.
Regards
Tony
On Thu, 22 Mar 2001 15:28:38 -0500 (EST) Lynn Allen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
BTW, how do you get those "neat" little Navajo patterns at the Bottom of
your msgs?
Aaarrggghh!
Regards
Tony Sleep
http://www.halftone.co.uk - Online portfolio exhibit; + film scanner info
comparisons
On Thu, 22 Mar 2001 15:51:30 - Dicky ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
What I will not accept is massive deviation from the subject implicit to
this list, and as I have just as much right to express my opinion as anyone
else then let me advise the truly stupid that should they continue on this
Tony wrote--
Stuffing the 2x2's into filing sheet pockets will be easier than
engineering a
film holder...
Good point. I was thinking there'd be more film than 2x2 holders, but that
wouldn't have to be true. It would certainly be cheaper than printing
each-and-every neg.
Hope we've helped the
This is certainly an understandable answer, if not a solution, since I'm
"locked in" to the 2700ppi format for awhile.
If I may be so naive to ask: What is a "pel size?" I get the idea that
"sympathetic vibration" is in play here.
Best regards--LRA
--Original Message--
From: [EMAIL
Stan wrote:
We figured that he/she must have been a kid or teenager rather than a
grown-up.
Later, we found out he was a cocker spaniel.
Very well put, Stan. Good story.LOL
Best regards--LRA
---
FREE! The World's Best Email Address @email.com
Thanks, Tony
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Tony Sleep" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2001 6:18 AM
Subject: filmscanners: ADMIN: OT bad tempers
| On Thu, 22 Mar 2001 15:51:30 - Dicky ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
|
| What I will not accept is
: On Thu, 22 Mar 2001 15:51:30 - Dicky ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
and as I have just as much right to express my opinion as anyone
else .
OOOPs ,BIG mistake.
you are able to use this list because the list OWNER lets you,and what
he says is his law.
- Original Message -
From: Roman Kielich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2001 4:31 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Grain in Color negative Film
At 06:54 22/03/2001 -0700, you wrote:
That's what I thought as well and the minilab I used is one
that (to
don't you reckon, Vuescan lacks of good tutorial, help file, manual?
Particularly, if Ed changes nomenclature used. I recommend you go to web
site of Windows Picture and see an example of a good tutorial.
Ed's addressed this on Filmscanners, and made an open offer to anyone who
wants to try to
Laurie wrote--
some artwork is considered to be in the public domain because they are
historic artifacts which were created prior to any copyright laws or under
older copyright laws which had time limitations clip
Ironically (especially in view of what I've been saying), *some* works have
But judging from that Turner Prize entry, you're in no danger whatever if
you copy and slightly re-interpret pictures you've found in books :-(
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tony Sleep) wrote:
On Wed, 21 Mar 2001 18:43:55 + Richard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
If I were to take a series of
France has such legislation, but not the UK.
The only restrictions anyone can impose are if you are taking photographs
on private property, in which case the owner of the property or his or her
burly security guards (!) can complain. Shopping centres are a surprising
example of this, the
Good job Tony. You've got a tough job I don't envy. Keep up the good work.
Your friend,
Jack Phipps
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001 10:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: filmscanners: ADMIN: OT, bad tempers, etc
FYI:
Noticed VueScan 7.0.4 is out (3/22) at:
http://www.hamrick.com/vsm.html
Release notes for 7.0.4 state:
* Fixed problem with HP SCSI flatbed scanners on
Windows 98/ME/2K
* Fixed problem with SCSI Minolta scanners and APS
On Fri, 23 Mar 2001 20:31:23 +1100 Roman =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kielich=AE?=
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Grain pattern is
dependant of the film structure, not developer.
Up to a point. The precise agents used and solvent action of a dev can make a
huge difference to grain. EG TriX or HP5 can be
On Thu, 22 Mar 2001 23:38:25 -0600 Laurie Solomon ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
Tony,
can't speak for the UK or for Europe for that matter; but in the US, some
artwork is considered to be in the public domain because they are historic
artifacts which were created prior to any copyright laws
On Thu, 22 Mar 2001 22:26:52 -0600 Laurie Solomon ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
I believe
that the "Re: filmscanner" portion of the header is not an option of the
sender of the message but is automatically added to the subject header by
the server.
Correct. This was repeatedly asked for by
- Original Message -
From: "JimD" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2001 5:01 AM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Rude Posts---was Tony please take note
Toward this end I've put little 'Dicky' in my email trash filter.
If I've played my
- Original Message -
From: "Derek Clarke" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2001 3:46 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: RE: OT UK Copyright Issues
France has such legislation, but not the UK.
The only restrictions anyone can impose are if you are taking
I'm not Roman, but am sure he meant Picture Window at: http://dl-c.com/
Bob Wright
- Original Message -
From: Eli Bowen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2001 11:07 AM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Vuescan
Hi Roman,
Do you have the URL of the Windows
About to buy a new PC, I am wondering if there is an adapter to connect my
Nikon LS2000 SCSI (and flatbed) to a 1394 port.
I am currently using an Adaptec 1940 AU SCSI card.
I have contacted Adaptec and am waiting for an answer.
May be some other manufacturers out there - which are hiding from
Richard,
| How sensible of you
|
| Richard Corbett
|
Come on Richard, we have enough problems here, in the UK, with Foot and
Mouth disease in our farm animals without someone with Foot In Mouth. Give
us a rest and ask some pertinent questions or pass on some of your knowledge
of film-scanning,
The server will always place "filmscanners" at the beginning of the
Subject line when a user posts to the list (even if the entire Subject
line is deleted before replying). If a user *replies* to a previous post
without deleting the subject line, the server will begin the Subject
line with
It appears most folks on this list use Vuescan but for me it was a waste of
money. I found it awkward to use and slow. I am using Insight 5.0 with SS4k
and really like it. Fast preview scans, previews of all images in the
holder, real time updates of any image adjustments, (which are good on
On 23/3/01 7:17 pm, "Dicky" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Derek Clarke" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2001 3:46 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: RE: OT UK Copyright Issues
France has such legislation, but not the UK.
The
On Fri, 23 Mar 2001 14:42:30 - Michael Wilkinson
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
OOOPs ,BIG mistake.
you are able to use this list because the list OWNER lets you,and what
he says is his law.
Yup, cruel but true. I don't pay for list hosting to read bad language. I can
stay at home and get
VueScan has limited options for scan resolutions,
I only need 72 dpi if I'm scanning for the web, not 500).
Scanning 72 dpi off of film will give you a web image about the size
of the film itself.
Bill Ross
this list is the silliest list i've ever been on. a handful of stubborn
mules continue to have an offtopic discussion about offtopic posts, or long,
drawn out off topic discussions that could EASILY be moved into private
email (but are not because 1. people are too lazy to change the To: line
At 11:07 23/03/2001 -0800, you wrote:
Hi Roman,
Do you have the URL of the Windows Picture web site you
mentioned?
Thanks,
Eli
www.dl-c.com
Hello Laurie,
What you say is probably the case. I'll find out in this message.
Chris
-Original Message-
From: Laurie Solomon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thursday, March 22, 2001 9:50 PM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Re: OT messages OTquestions.
At 18:30 23/03/2001 +, you wrote:
On Fri, 23 Mar 2001 20:31:23 +1100 Roman =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kielich=AE?=
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Grain pattern is
dependant of the film structure, not developer.
Up to a point. The precise agents used and solvent action of a dev can make a
huge
I just checked it out on my HP flatbed also, works incredibly well!! Once
again, Ed is "THE MAN".
Edwin
- Original Message -
From: "Ezio" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2001 8:47 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: VueScan 7.0.4
Grazie !!!
I was
is GEM available only at the hardware level? or is there a way to do GEM
post scan? more specifically will i ever be able to take a raw scan (RGBI)
from the LS2000 and do GEM processing on it?
--
j u l e s @ p o p m o n k e y . c o m
http://www.popmonkey.com/jules
I don't believe that's true. Like Tony says, the man has to take a break
every now and then. All this talking behind his back and speaking for him is
in extremely bad taste.
Frank Paris
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
I on the other hand find that VueScan produces much better results than
Insight 5.0 with virtually no twiddling at all.
Frank Paris
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bud
Another very good reason for not using traditional Anglo Saxon terms of abuse
is that I've now had a swathe of digests bounced back to me by nanny mailserver
s/w
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Precedence: bulk
X-Envelope-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-UIDL: _4Y.W5zu6.sulphur
Subject: Undeliverable
HI Vicki,
There may be a number of advantages to waiting for Nikon's newer film
scanners, unless you must have one in the next several weeks.
The Ls-2000/30 models suffered from some stepper motor problems which
likely were designed out of the new scanners. Prices on quality CCD
chips have
I've been trawling in the archive
(http://phi.res.cse.dmu.ac.uk/htdig) for the discussion I
remember here 3-4 months ago about Kodak's "Supra" neg
films, with allegedly good characteristics for scanning, and
a protective layer. The conclusions were ambiguous then.
Like Michael Wilkinson who's
Indeed. I'm very impressed with out how much work Ed, and also Tony, devote
to helping out people with information and guidance. To be sure, they do it
in part because the subject interests them -- it's their thing, so to speak.
But it's also clear that what they do emanates from good will and a
48 matches
Mail list logo
