I know nothing about it but I'm sure it's a Dockers thing - Chicago is like
that.
Maris Lidaka
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, May 05, 2001 6:02 AM
Subject: filmscanners: DPIX Expo May 17-19
| Is anyone on this list going to the DPIX
Jack Phipps wrote:
Opps?
It is important to try it on your negatives.
Since when did Kodak make Kodachrome negatives?
Sorry, I should have proofed better.
Jack
Does ASF know why certain Kodachrome succeed in working with ICE and
other don't? Does it depend upon the dye
I do not know what I am doing wrong, but I downloaded Vuescan and tried to
use it. God is it long winded
and it screws up my PC. First it takes an age showing busy, then another age
processing mask. etc.
For scanning at the moment Microteks Scanwizard is far more useable on
my Microtek 35t
Robert wrote:
I do not know what I am doing wrong, but I downloaded Vuescan and tried to
use it. God is it long winded
and it screws up my PC. First it takes an age showing busy, then another age
processing mask. etc.
For scanning at the moment Microteks Scanwizard is far more useable on
my
I have been using 35+ as a photographer and and it is a real good scanner
even if you compare
it to the new Nikon LS4000.
Picture results are excellent. I think I have done at least 1000 jobs
on that scanner.
Best results did I get with Polaroid 2.7.1 software. You can download it
from
With all the complaining we do about the hardware and software
manufacturers, I felt a need to tell a good story for a change.
To my surprise, when the refurbished 1270 I recently purchased proved DOA,
they sent me a NEW one as a replacement instead of another refurbished one.
So, for $261
Okay, I can't put it off any longer. The new site is officially live. List
of additions and improvements is massive but highlights include:
-- more than a hundred new photographs (some have been on Zing)
-- new 'hard' (20-image) and 'extended' (50-image) edits of HUMAN TRAFFIC,
including new
Larry wrote:
Exactly one year later, the1200 started giving me trouble (by the way, are
these scanners considered disposable??)
AFAIK, there is no truth to the rumor that Epson is owned by Kimberly-Clark,
makers of Kleenex! ;-)
Customer Relations sent call tags for the
Perfection 636,1200
Please excuse me for being totally off-topic here, but is there unusually
low List traffic? I've logged 28 msgs in 3 days, which is about 20% of the
usual number in a slow period.
The reason I ask is that I've been noticing a lot of really strange Internet
performance in the past couple
No problems here - just an ebb in the flow of the list.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: Lynn Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 11:24 AM
Subject: filmscanners: OT: Filmscanners Traffic
| Please excuse me for being totally off-topic here, but is
Laurie: I guess we wouldn't expect less. However; when we usually hear
something about a company, the message is usually one that trashes them.
Usually, when people are properly served, they say nothing about it and go on
their merry way. It is nice to hear that a company, especially a large
The fact is, Epson ink-jet printers are an incredible bargain, even
allowing for the high ink and paper prices. Ten years ago I would have
found it inconceivable that I could get photo-quality reproduction from a
printer costing under $300.
If you get good service in addition to an incredible
12 matches
Mail list logo
