Oostrom, Jerry wrote:
> BTW. Lately I had sent in my scanner for service, and when I received it
> back (problem not solved, at best only marginal improvements!) I received an
> extra filmholder and slideholder!
Maybe using double holders will fix the service problem?
Or some poor guy now h
on 5/28/01 4:53 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Ed, this came up on the Digital Silver mailing list but I'd been wondering
>> myself what happened to the 'output raw file' checkbox in the mac
>> version. It ain't there anymore! Not in 7.0.24, or 23, or 7.0.6 either. How
>
on 5/28/01 4:38 PM, Johnny Deadman at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Ed, this came up on the Digital Silver mailing list but I'd been wondering
> myself what happened to the 'output raw file' checkbox in the mac version.
> It ain't there anymore! Not in 7.0.24, or 23, or 7.0.6 either. How do we
>
Ed, this came up on the Digital Silver mailing list but I'd been wondering
myself what happened to the 'output raw file' checkbox in the mac
version. It ain't there anymore! Not in 7.0.24, or 23, or 7.0.6 either. How
do we output a raw file these days?
--
John Brownlow
http://www.pinkheadedb
In a message dated 5/28/2001 3:43:59 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Ed, this came up on the Digital Silver mailing list but I'd been wondering
> myself what happened to the 'output raw file' checkbox in the mac
> version. It ain't there anymore! Not in 7.0.24, or 23, or 7.0.6 either. H
I just released VueScan 7.0.24 for Windows, Linux and Mac OS 8/9/X.
It can be downloaded from:
http://www.hamrick.com/vsm.html
What's new in version 7.0.24
* Improved support for 14-bit UMAX scanners
* Added support for varying CCD exposure time when using
transparency adapter on HP
Good point, I had forgot that. And this is in essence why in a given
configuration, the CMYK space is more compressed than RGB.
- Original Message -
From: "Maris V. Lidaka, Sr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, May 27, 2001 11:48 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: whic
>I would think that a digital camera with Macro and Zoom capabilities on a
>copy stand would do a great job on the flat copy. Obviously lighting would
>have to be balanced for color and glare to get the best results.
With traditional film based copy set-up, one can use polarizing filtration
(sing
It absolutely works well with Vuescan. In fact, I rarely used the Canon
scanning software with it, the performance under Vuescan being so good.
Pat
- Original Message -
From: "j n" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> I had assumed that the FS2710 was too expensive, but
> you're right, I guess it's
on 5/28/01 10:00 AM, Alan Eckert at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Silverfast Ai 5.0 came bundled with my Sprintscan 4000 and, while it seems to
> be very capable scanning software, it has one highly annoying trait. It
> presents the registration box every time I invoke it, and I must laboriously
>
why didntr I think of that, this lurker now has a solution, thanks
--- Colin Maddock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm afraid almost all my experience using the FS2710
> is with negs, and you look to be asking about
> slides. Someone else may come in here with that
> information. Shadow detail is always difficult. Have
> you compared scanners for this aspect in To
At 11:19 28/05/01 -0400, you wrote:
>I would think that a digital camera with Macro and Zoom capabilities on a
>copy stand would do a great job on the flat copy. Obviously lighting would
>have to be balanced for color and glare to get the best results.
>One of the cameras with an LCD viewfinder th
I would think that a digital camera with Macro and Zoom capabilities on a
copy stand would do a great job on the flat copy. Obviously lighting would
have to be balanced for color and glare to get the best results.
One of the cameras with an LCD viewfinder that rotates off the lens axis
like the N
Silverfast Ai 5.0 came bundled with my Sprintscan
4000 and, while it seems to be very capable scanning software, it has one highly
annoying trait. It presents the registration box every time I invoke it,
and I must laboriously re-enter the registration number each time. It's
frustrating en
My current project is to take a large collection of multi-format negatives
and transparencies (35mm to 4x5), b&w color prints (billfold to 8x10) to
scan them into JPEG for insertion into PowerPoint 2000 slides for full
frame projection via DLP (Digital Light Processing) at 600x800 pixels.
I ha
Larry wrote:
>The only way you might experience the differences you are referring to is
if you are scanning to a jpeg output which creates an imprecise workflow and
inconsistent results.
That's exactly what I did (it's the way HP Precision Scan works), and it
explains what I'm seeing. I bow to t
Stuart,
we have a Canon 2700FS here at the University of Aberdeen if
you're interested. This will give you 2720 dpi at full resolution
which I can email straight to you.
Regards Chris McBrien (Engineering Dept.)
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTE
jn wrote:
>I had assumed that the FS2710 was too expensive, but
>you're right, I guess it's now selling for around $400
>in the US. Does this scanner benefit from Vuescan,
>too, with regards to noise reduction, shadow detail,
>or other improvements in image quality?
I'm afraid almost all my exp
Hi guys -this is a message for anyone in the UK who is wiling to do me a
favour . I am presently using a flatbed to scan printsmainly to send to
websites and would like to invest in a slidescanner so I can use slide film
instead and get the best of both worlds but dont want to jump in with both
> jn asked:
>> I would like to get a $350-$450 scanner to make scans
>> of slides to produce 8x10" prints on either an Epson
>> 870 or Canon S800 inkjet printer.
>
> How about the Canon FS2710? Probably in your price range.
>
> Colin Maddock
>
>
>
>
jn
I have the Canonscan too and am very p
> -Original Message-
> From: Phil [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 7:00 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: filmscanners: Fast, decent, low res scans
>
> Thank you for the replies on the "how do I make fast, decent low res
> scans"
> question I poste
Unfortunately there is one point which you don't mention - CMYK is defined
as the color space or gamut of *printable* colors. In theory you could
perhaps have more colors using C, M and Y with the addition of K but today's
inks can't print all those colors and in fact can't print all the colors w
jn asked:
>>I would like to get a $350-$450 scanner to make
scans
>>of slides to produce 8x10" prints on either an Epson
>>870 or Canon S800 inkjet printer.
Colin Maddock answered:
>How about the Canon FS2710? Probably in your price
>range.
I had assumed that the FS2710 was too expensive, bu
24 matches
Mail list logo