I have no idea if Nikon uses them, but blue LEDs have a particularly short
lifespan. In any case I dont think occasional users like us will ever burn out
an LED array or a tube. Definitely not me, I keep my scanner off when not in
use.
"Austin Franklin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>My guess is y
just ask the lab to extend developing time (in the first developer), here are
the numbers from the Kodak web site:
http://www.kodak.com/cluster/global/en/professional/support/techPubs/e28/e28.shtml
Starting-Point Exposures for Push Processing EKTACHROME Film E200
Exposure Index Specify This Push
"Joel Wilcox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Are you certain that Elitechrome 200 is the consumer variant of E200?
Yes.. I grabbed this from the Kodak site:
http://www.kodak.com/cluster/global/en/consumer/products/films/faqs/eliteFAQ.shtml
How is ELITE Chrome 200 different from th
Joel, that's a beautiful image..
"Joel Wilcox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Kim,
>I have been happy with Professional Ektachrome 200 for this kind of thing. I
>understand it pushes nicely from 200 to 400 or 800, but I have only shot it
>at 200.
>
>Here's a scan (SS4000) from this film:
>
>http
Arthur Entlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>OK, now I'm confused. I thought taking ASA 200 film up three 'stops'
>meant 200 to 400 to 800 to 1600 ISO/ASA. As I understood "stops" it was
>an additional f-stop.
I know its confusing, but this is what Kodak says on their web site..
>Since yo
I asked our lead service guy and he concurs with Tony's opinion. If you send
me a file I can have it looked at. The CCD is vertical so it is difficult
for dust to settle on it but it has been known to happen.
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Austin Franklin) wrote:
> > > > An LED light source for enlargers was not done 15-20 years ago
> > > > because it
> > > > was not possible. Blue LED's did not exist as anything other than
> > > > laboratory
> > > > curiosities until within the last 5 years.
> > >
> > > Sure you
In a message dated 6/22/2001 6:20:01 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Rafe wrote:
>35 mm images are about 60 Mbytes (24 bit color.)
>645 images are about 160-170 Mbytes (24 bit color.)
That stands to reason, given the larger size. I'm wondering if there is a
program that wo
I have located a copy of imgio.exe.
Stewart
Stewart wrote:
> I have just started receiving the message that imgio.exe cannot be
> found and I would appreciate being told where I can obtain the file.
Huh? Sure your computer hasn't got a virus?
Rob
I have done a little test and looked at VueScan 7.1.2 and Silverfast 5.2
LS4000 new version from Germany. Used scanner in the test LS2000.
VueScan can not handle LS4000 and MAC yet.
Test object: 3 dimensional test object including Mac Beth , gray scale,
black to white objects, silver
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001 14:53:09 -0400 cjcronin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> I want to make/burn cd's with images on them and have a thumbnail file
> on there too, that will automatically start when the cd is popped in
> the drive. So the user will have thumbnails in front of them and then
> t
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001 07:31:17 EDT ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Is it possible to have an idea of any idea of what the limits are
> likely to be for how many messages can be held in the mailbox?
This is entirely between you and your ISP. Some don't have any stated
limits, others are ferocious.
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001 13:08:04 +0100 Robert Logan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Tony, does your list account allow the use of 'procmail
> filtering?
Unfortunately, I have no direct control or ability to change things. It is
currently hosted by my service provider. Majordomo can be set up to detec
In a message dated 6/22/2001 1:36:55 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Seconded! I was intrigued to find that the ICE feature was a binary
> option. Earlier versions of Vuescan gave me the impression that it
> was a variable effect.
Earlier versions basically limited the size of the larges
In a message dated 6/22/2001 3:09:17 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> Just wondering, if "glamour" a code word porn these days...
>
>
> No :-))
>
My reason for asking this actually had a purpose, beyond the humorous.
Getting quality color
- Original Message -
From: "Lynn Allen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 10:42 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: what defines this quality?
> What's more likely to happen, is a
> jump in technology, maybe a digital screen that fits into a thin frame on
From: Isaac Crawford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Not only is the "typical" life of LEDs far longer than what you have
> asserted, you were pretty snide when you pointed out your "superior"
> knowledge. So I guess all the above poster was pointing out is what
goes
> around comes around...:-)
Austin is
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001 07:51:13 -0400 rafeb ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I can easily imagine packages and monolithich LED arrays
> that allow for very, very close stacking of LEDs, so that
> you could have, say, 20 or 50 or even 100 LEDs per inch.
ISTR reading somewhere that the LS1000 used a
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001 12:32:13 -0700 Shough, Dean ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> The slide was made on a thick polyester base film. Must be standard -
> Sinepatterns seems to use the same base.
> printed at a resolution of 2 microns per pixel
Just as a matter of interest, how the hell do you do
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001 16:25:14 -0400 (EDT) Raphael Bustin
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> 645 negatives take about five minutes, more or
> less, with ICE turned off. This is a rough
> guess, I haven't actually timed it. Certainly
> no more time than it took my Epson 1640SU to do
> the same job
The first place I'd look for the file would be the Recycle Bin. It may have
been deleted accidentally and gone there.
When do you get this error? (I mean, launching which program)
- Original Message -
From: "Stewart Musket" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, Jun
22 matches
Mail list logo
