I haven't been following this thread of late, but isn't there a
setting that takes longer but DOES NOT band at all? If so, why not
just use that? Epson printers frequently band at all but the slowest
settings, so that's what I always use. This would seem like a similar
situation?
Just wonderin
> Yes, so you'd think. But the manual is entirely innocent of any
> instructions on adjusting brightness, and the monitor itself has no sliders
> or knobs, just a button depicting what appears to be a "brightness" logo (a
> sun with rays extending outward), but which, when pressed summons a contr
David,
Did you find a place to put this doc? I hope so, but if not, please
try to mail it to me.
Thanks, Dave King
- Original Message -
From: Hemingway, David J <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 9:52 AM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Re: Polaroid SS120
Rob wonders ...
> Moreno wrote:
> >I've also had some banding issues, but if I scan 14 bit, at either
2000
> or
> >4000 dpi, with 1x multisampling, the images are clean.
>
> ... I wonder if this is a new variant of the jaggies issue
> from the earlier scanners?
It would at least be part of t
Alan writes ...
> Yes, so you'd think. But the manual is entirely innocent of any
> instructions on adjusting brightness, and the monitor itself has no
sliders
> or knobs, just a button depicting what appears to be a "brightness"
logo (a
> sun with rays extending outward), but which, when presse
We have just taken delivery of an 8000 and so far are very pleased although
we have been too busy to do any extensive testing. If someone could let me
know the most predicatable settings and transparency type to get banding I
will see if I can reproduce here. If I can I can help add weight to th
- Original Message -
From: "Dave King" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 7:24 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Re: Polaroid SS120 Scan Size
The 4000 is not capable of doing long scans. It will only do 24x36 or very
slightly longer. I imagine that the
> It would at least be part of the troubleshooting effort to
> determine if the same banding occurs with Vuescan(?)
Does Vuescan support the 8000?
Rumour from the Nikon reps says that NikonScan 3.2 will be out shortly. Who
know, this may help with some of the issues.
Moreno,
I can do that too but isn't it a bit like saying 'my car doesn't stall as
long as I don't use 5th gear and go over 60 miles/km per hr'? These things
should not band, period.
Lawrence Smith
*
* visit my site and participate *
* in this weeks image critiq
- Original Message -
From: Alan Eckert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 1:20 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Slightly OT -- Apple Studio Monitor
Brightness
> Yes, so you'd think. But the manual is entirely innocent of any
> instructions on adjustin
Hello! I'm a relative newcomer to the list, although I've been lurking
in the digest for a while.
I use a Nikon LS-2000 with VueScan. I'm running a Pentium 166 (don't
laugh), 128 megs RAM, Win98 original edition. At the moment, I'm only
posting photos on the Web, both B&W and color. (Printin
> I can do that too but isn't it a bit like saying 'my car doesn't stall as
> long as I don't use 5th gear and go over 60 miles/km per hr'? These
things
> should not band, period.
At my end, scans with the 8000 at 1x show less noise in the shadows than
some scans done with an Imacon. And I scan
Hello! I'm a relative newcomer to the list, although I've been lurking
in the digest for a while.
I use a Nikon LS-2000 with VueScan. I'm running a Pentium 166 (don't
laugh), 128 megs RAM, Win98 original edition. At the moment, I'm only
posting photos on the Web, both B&W and color. (Printin
I get
it in areas of blue/purple (think storm clouds) when scanning at 16x
multisampling and ICE on. When multisample is turned off, the problem
rarely occurs.
Lawrence
Lawrence Smith**
visit my site and participate ** in this weeks image critique **
ht
- Original Message -
From: Peter A. Klein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 7:33 PM
Subject: filmscanners: Photoshop 5 LE files darker than they look
> I think PS 5 LE is using either a default gamma, or a default color
> space that you can't chan
So, some questions Mike:
1. how would you alter my conclusions on my website?
2. which slide films do you think the LS40 has enough DMax for?
3. your results from Vuescan's Slide setting seem radically different from
those I got - what gives?
4. will you continue to investigate multi-scanning
Title: Minolta Scan Multi Pro
Hello all,
I've pretty much given up on getting a Nikon LS-8000 based on Lawrence's experience. After having returned my LS8000 I got put on a waiting list for another (I tried a SS-120 in the meantime and decided I want Digital ICE). However, it looks like th
Richard wrote:
>If it's the 17" Apple Studio Display then its a self calibrating monitor,
>believe it or not. I have one and it regularly asks me if I want to
>recalibrate. There is no brightness control only a contrast slider. To
>calibrate select the Colour option in the monitors control panel.
Alan: Thank you! The Adobe forums cleared up the mystery. Indeed, PS 5
LE is set to a display gamma of 1.8, which can't be changed. Now Photoshop
Elements does have the color management and gamma correction stuff. What
PS Elements doesn't have, according to the specs and user comments I re
Alan wrote:
>It is my kids at the beach, the sand is more yellow than gray, but Vuescan
>is giving me pretty aweful color. Wondering what some of you others use
>for color settings when working with Beach pictures?
You mean you don't have yellow sand? :) The last beach photos I took were
Kodak
Have you set the Crop and Buffer such that you are sure VueScan is
looking at actual picture content (and not frame edges or sprocket
holes) for setting the white and black points? If it sees a sprocket
hole or an opaque frame edge that really messes things up! The picture
will be quite flat (low
21 matches
Mail list logo
