well first of all if you want they have a bug fix version
of Nikon Scan Version 3.1 on their website.. I think the
address is www.nikon-imaging.com
Thanks. I couldn't access that URL for some reason, but found 3.1 at
http://www.nikontechusa.com.
I also notice that on that site it
Nikon LS 4000 are sharp in the middle of the film area but un sharp out
against the sides and corner . The example are from the right side of a
slide film.
I have to support Mikel. Recently I was able to scan photos with my FS4000 and
the same negatives/slides were scanned with Nikon. The
Hi Mark
The URL he gave doesn`t exist. Nikon Scan V3.1 does work with XP
I use it all the time. Nikon Scan V3.1.1 is due soon, that supposedly
fixes various bugs. But Nikon offical line will allows be that it
doesn`t support XP, because if they said it did they would have to
provide
I agree with you Bill absolutely. LS IVED behaves in the same way. I agree
with units you mentioned - which applied to real word mean to measure via
the software uneveness of film position in the holder which must not be more
than 12 units and to put focus in the middle. If the number is higher
Tony,
I appreciate your effort in maintaining the list, and would hate to see it
go away. It seems to me, however, that how best to store images generated
from filmscanners fully satisfies the issues arising from the use of
clause in the charter, and is therefore not off topic. I agree that the
Hi Ken,
One thing I've learned long ago is that simple questions rarely create
simple answers.
The first problem is that of definition of terms. There are many types
of printers used with computers, and there are many different types of
each subclass, each using different methods of
You might want to consider a HEPA air cleaner over an ionizer cleaner. Ozone
created as a byproduct may damage your prints.
Honeywell has an extensive line. The Target store chain in US used to
carry a good selection, but you can get them at Best Buy, many other places.
David Lewiston wrote:
Tony,
Frankly I have had such a lot of trouble with this list
lately, with admin taking up so much time I seldom have
time to read up to date, let alone participate. 250 bounce
mails today, and that after I spent 1hr weeding dead
addresses; complaints from list members about
conduct of
sorry about that did not remember the website address.. the site also has a
firmware upgrade for the scanner also...
=
- Original Message -
From: Mark Otway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 12:10 AM
Subject: RE:
Thank you for that very informative post. There is one issue I believe
warrants clarification, IMO.
So you don't want to scan at 1440 dpi at full size to deliver a
file to an Epson 1440 dpi printer, the driver will just toss all that
extra info,
The driver should/does not just toss the
I had the same focus issues with my 8000 although I did not know it at the
time. When I replaced it with a drum scanner and compared scans (120
film)
from the drum to those from the 8000, I discovered that the nikon scans
were
not sharp to the edges. When viewed by themselves, the nikon
Arthur -
Thank you very much for a considered explanation. I'm studying it!
Ken Durling
Photo.net portfolio:
http://www.photo.net/shared/community-member?user_id=402251
Tony,
I would hate to see you close the list. I, for one, have learned a lot from
many of the members and their contributions and want to thank you fro
creating, maintaining and especially contributing to this list.
Having said that, I confess I rarely review posts in detail anymore, with
the
Hello Lawrence
Nice to here from you again.
What kind of drum scanner and price?
Best regards Mikael Risedal
--
From: Lawrence Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: filmscanners halftone.co.uk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Canon 4000 scanner VS Nikon LS4000
I'm a new owner of this scanner and I'm wondering if anyone else has a
problem with Silverfast and Photoshop! So far version 5.2 and 5.5 will
not run on my Photoshop (6.0) and the tech guy doesn't seem to know why.
Any ideas?
Should I just skip it and go to Vuescan? What are the advantages of
Just paid for my update (LS1000) received the orderconfirmation but my
password was not included. Anyone know if it will come as a seperate
sending. The confirmation page on the site indicates that it will be
supplied with the confirmation.
Kindest Regards
Chris Bangs
But a number of months ago you claimed success in focusing by selecting a
focus point midway between the center an edge. Are you backing away from
this?
thanks,
Brian
--
respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From:
Try out Vuescan and see if you like it - trial download is free.
The essential differences are that Vuescan is designed to (and does) capture *all*
information from the slide or film, and then you adjust color, tone and contrast in
Photoshop.
Silverfast is designed to do color, tone and
Barbara,
you'll need to provide a lot more info than it don't work! Lots of folk on
this forum know lots about many things, but none have yet claimed any
expertise at mind reading.
Ian
Mark Otway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alternatively, you could move the list to a yahoogroups list.
Which also allow more than one moderator so the work can be shared.
Rob
Barbara,
Might need a little bit of info on the definition of does not work.
Platform, OS version etc. Also who have you been talking to at Lasersoft?
I will say that as Silverfast is a Photoshop Plugin, Photoshop can sometimes
cause the problem. Rather than chase it is sometimes easier to
I also have just done some tests with my LS4000 and can conclude exactly the
same. Differences in 10 or or focus units shows a definite blur in those
areas.
Some people are mentioning that they use glass and I suppose I must also
do this if I am to get sharp scans - what a pain!
Are there any
22 matches
Mail list logo
