[filmscanners] Re: Good $300 scanner for 35mm & 120?

2004-06-03 Thread David J. Littleboy
From: "Ken McKaba" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> I've just started exploring film scanners. Can anyone recommend a good one that will handle 35mm & 6x6 that is <$300? << If you need 6x6, spend a bit more money and get the Epson 4870. http://www5e.biglobe.ne.jp/~longnose/scanner_test.

[filmscanners] Re: Pacific Image PowerSlide 3600 opinions?

2004-06-03 Thread David J. Littleboy
From: "Clark Guy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > HI, Jawed! My jaw'd (sorry! ;-) ) hit the keyboard if it weren't attached so firmly to my face! I am very impressed with what I saw in that review! I suppose that if I were going to be REALLY professional, I'd still want a dedicated film sca

[filmscanners] Re: Good $300 scanner for 35mm & 120?

2004-06-03 Thread Austin Smith
I'm going to enjoy the answers to this one. Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners' or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or body

[filmscanners] Good $300 scanner for 35mm & 120?

2004-06-03 Thread Ken McKaba
I've just started exploring film scanners. Can anyone recommend a good one that will handle 35mm & 6x6 that is <$300? Will I be happy with a flatbed with a transparency attachment? Thanks, Ken Unsubscribe b

[filmscanners] RE: Pacific Image PowerSlide 3600 opinions?

2004-06-03 Thread Clark Guy
HI, Jawed! My jaw'd (sorry! ;-) ) hit the keyboard if it weren't attached so firmly to my face! I am very impressed with what I saw in that review! I suppose that if I were going to be REALLY professional, I'd still want a dedicated film scanner, but evidently, this flatbed competes very favora

[filmscanners] Re: Kodachrome 25 versus?

2004-06-03 Thread Berry Ives
on 6/2/04 6:39 PM, David Lewiston at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I'm getting ready for another field trip. In the past, I have always used > K25 for subjects with fine detail. Imacon scans have yielded 20x prints > effortlessly. > > K25 is no longer manufactured in the U.S. Is it still available in

[filmscanners] Re: Kodachrome 25 versus?

2004-06-03 Thread Berry Ives
on 6/2/04 6:39 PM, David Lewiston at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I'm getting ready for another field trip. In the past, I have always used > K25 for subjects with fine detail. Imacon scans have yielded 20x prints > effortlessly. > > K25 is no longer manufactured in the U.S. Is it still available in

[filmscanners] Re: Kodachrome 25 versus?

2004-06-03 Thread Arthur Entlich
The demise of K-25 is a shame, but I would suggest you consider looking at the Fuji "F" line of films. In specific, the Provia 100F is a fairly neutral film with very fine grain which scans well. It gives you a 2 stop advantage over the K-25, as well and uses standard E-6 processing. Art David

[filmscanners] Re: Kodachrome 25 versus?

2004-06-03 Thread David J. Littleboy
From: "David Lewiston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> > Does Agfa still make RSX (ISO 50)? I'll have to look into this. Is it virtually grainless, like K25? <<< I've never used it: it appears in a 2-year old brochure that happens to be sitting on my desk. Again, there's a Zeiss articl