You take a plastic card--eg, a xerox machine card or a hotel entry key
card--and you cut it to the right length and tape it in place. When in
Mexico, I used a wooden coffee stirrer. Very low tech, and you can have
different cards for slides of different thicknesses.
I would post an image, but
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or body
Tom,
I bow to your obviously superior knowledge on this. I simply remembered my
young days, when learning to get the microscope condenser set up properly
was the most important part of using a microscope.
I do know that when I switch to using the diffuse light option in the
Minolta 5400, the
Hi Cliff,
I think the majority of the information you indicated is very well to
heeded.
However, anti-reflective coatings typically do not come off by cleaning,
not any cleaner that anyone would dare use on a glass lens mounted in a
painted or plastic mount, at least. Anti reflective coatings
I didn't read the full reposting, so I wasn't aware it gave the info on
cleaning front surface mirror, and I didn't want to reply on my memory
as to the process, since one slip-up and the mirror is toast.
Personally, I would not over-clean a front surface mirror just because
it takes next to
Tom,
Surely the whole purpose of collimated light sources is to achieve maximum
resolution (I seem to remember this from my light microscopy days many years
ago). If you use diffuse light, you will not achieve max resolution: it's
equivalent to blurring the image. The Minolta 5400 has a removable
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or body
Hello Bob, with all respect, I must disagree about condenser light, both
from the standpoint of theory and experience. Sharpness, and diffused vs
collimated light sources have been a raging debate for decades now, in so
far as enlarger light sources are concerned. The most widely available
Firstly, the reason the Minolta now comes with a filter is because I,
and a couple of other people got together and proved to Minolta their
light source was not diffused enough, and was leading to problems with
dust and scratches and such causing major headaches. In fact, it
happened because a
Rob,
I have done it. I may have disassembled mine farther than absolutely
necessary in the process, but I did get a pretty good look at all of it.
The CCD is actually mounted at a right angle and is unlikely to have
much if any dust on it. The only thing you need to worry about cleaning
is the
FWIW, I wrote the repair info posted in Jan 03 by Thomas Maugham, he was
reprinting my earlier post. About the front surface mirror cleaning, all of
the info is included in this post. What you need to know is to use
denatured alcohol, use a tissue to swipe it across the mirror with no
pressure,
I gather nobody on the list has attempted to clean the CCD of a SS4000?
Rob
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in
I have a friend in his 70's who just bought an Epson 4870 Scanner based
on my recommendation to scan his library of slides. I thought a
dedicated slide neg scanner like the LS5000 would be too complicated for
him to utilize, and warned him that flatbeds aren't as sharp in scanning
slides as
Not having lived to talk about it ;-)
Are you getting halos around bright areas?
Why do you think it needs cleaning?
Art
Rob Geraghty wrote:
I gather nobody on the list has attempted to clean the CCD of a SS4000?
Rob
looks familiar?
http://www.jessops.com/search/viewproduct.cfm?PRODUCT=REFD3600SMS
http://www.braun-phototechnik.de/E/Products/scanner/scanner.htm
http://www.reflecta.de/htms.com/p_fil09.htm
reflecta seem to sell branded versions of the pacific imaging range, as do jessops
(major UK
At 10:49 PM 2/24/2004 +1000, Rob Geraghty wrote:
I gather nobody on the list has attempted to clean the CCD of a SS4000?
Rob
Hi Rob,
The following was posted in January of '03 on this List by Thomas Maugham:
Summary of SS4000 cleaning discussion.
HOW DO I KNOW IF MY SCANNER NEEDS CLEANING?
Arthur Entlich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not having lived to talk about it ;-)
Are you getting halos around bright areas?
Why do you think it needs cleaning?
Because I had the case open to blow dust out of the stupid carrier sensor
and had a look through to the CCD - or perhaps the mirror. I'm
PLEASE: we should add to this:
After you have release the catches, slide the cover off very slowly and
use a penlight to visualize the wires connecting the switch under the
cover to the main unit. These wires are short and if the cover is
removed in certain directions, one or more of these
Somewhere in the archives of this list there was a discussion about
cleaning front surface mirrors, I believe. I think a camera repairman
provided a primer on the method without damaging the surface.
You may be correct that the inability to autofocus might be dirt on
either the mirror or the
If I recall correctly, this problem with short wires was an early
version design flaw which Polaroid/Microtek corrected, and had a recall
on some years ago.
But some may still have the problem, so its a good warning.
Art
Stan Schwartz wrote:
PLEASE: we should add to this:
After you have
Hi Jim,
This sounds like a newer mainboard which, chances are, has a perfectly
fine set of VIA chips. Older VIA chipsets (like from 3-4 years ago)
were problematic (Like on my Asus P3V133 board).
Hopefully the flashing of the bios will settle things.
Art
James L. Sims wrote:
Art,
The
So far, so good, Art. You are right - the older VIA chipsets were a
real pain. Maybe they've got their act together with the later ones.
Jim
Arthur Entlich wrote:
Hi Jim,
This sounds like a newer mainboard which, chances are, has a perfectly
fine set of VIA chips. Older VIA chipsets (like
I want to thank everyone for taking the time to respond. I hope that
sometime I will learn a little and be able to pay back the group to some
extent.
Ed Lusby
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with
Hello,
Another lurker jumps in!
I've been following the answers to Ed Lusby's question about
Kodachrome, the Nikon 5000 and bulk loaders.
I have a similar series of question, but with a different emphasis:
As near as I can tell, the Nikon line is the only one with a bulk
loader for slides. Is
Hi Art,
I am sharpening using what I feel is a superb product...PhotoKit Sharpener.
The results I am getting are better than when I 'self sharpened' with USM.
The prints, when enlarged, seem to have too much grain for my taste prior to
the image being what I feel is sharp enough. The slides are
In a message dated 2/23/2004 12:52:23 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Has anybody seen any reviews that compare the Nikon 5000 with its
predecessors? I.e., are there significant improvements, or would one
be just as well served by buying a 4000, since the price on
these
It's good to have the company of another lurker. I did find one other
scanner with bulk feeding capabilities, the Pacific Image Powerslide 3600
USB/1394 interface (3600dpi). The one good thing about this scanner is
price: less than $700! It has the ability to use a slide magazine or a
carousel
We received our Nikon 5000 and slide feeder about 2 weeks ago from CDW
(USA). Haven't gotten to put it through its paces yet -- just a quick
scan to make sure it worked, which it did.
--
Wade Lawrence
On Feb 23, 2004, at 3:38 PM, Ed Lusby wrote:
However, I don't think the Nikon is available yet
Art,
The mainboard (Gigabyte GA-7VAXP) was new last January and has a KT400
(PAC) and VT8235 (PSIPC) chipsets. Unfortunately, they are VIA
chipsets. I almost did not buy this mainboard because it had VIA
chipsets but, in talking to AMD, an engineer there said that this was a
good mainboard and
Art, I believe it's in the VT8235 chipset.
Jim
Arthur Entlich wrote:
I'm stumped. Which chip set is used for USB on your mainboard?
Art
James L. Sims wrote:
Thanks Laurie, the USB controllers are on the motherboard and I haven't
upgrade the BIOS. I am not using an external hub. One of
Petru...Thanks for your response. I looked at your Black and White sample
from your website..though I have to admit I looked at it in the web browser
as opposed to in Photoshop. While it looks to me that Neat Image did a nice
job removing grain it also looked to me like there was also a loss in
I have a 6in1 internal card
reader that, once ejected or unplugged, won't come back without a
system restart. The only devices that do not cause any problem are
the Epson printer (USB) and Polaroid 120 scanner (Firewire).
Not specifically on your problem; but sometimes if the unpluging and
I had tried the Rescan for Hardware routine in Device Manager, Laurie,
to no avail. So far, things seem to be working OK with the new BIOS flash.
I agree that USB is finicky and why the new keyboards and pointing
devices have USB interface is beyond me. I recently had a new pointing
device give
Howard Grill wrote:
Petru...Thanks for your response. I looked at your Black and White sample
from your website..though I have to admit I looked at it in the web browser
as opposed to in Photoshop.
This comment was about the color photos, so don't worry about it.
While it looks to me that
Howard Grill wrote:
How effective are products like Grain Surgery, Neat Image and Noise Ninja at
removing what appears to be film grain after sharpening images scanned at
4000 ppi.
So far my experience with Neat Image has been very good. For an example
see the paragraph that talks about bw scans
I am having very good luck scanning old Kodachrome (not sure if 64 or 25)
35mm slides with a Nikon 4000. I have to work to recover the color, but
Vuescan does 50% of the work for me. Some of the slides have a funny
surface--probably lacquer that has aged--and the IR does a good job of
removing it.
I have a Polaroid 4000 (not Plus), Ed, and it seems to scan my old
slides, Fujichrome as well as Kodachrome, well, at least with the
LaserSoft SilverFast software. No bulk loader, though, at least not
as far as I know, and I wouldn't say it's fast either.
--
Sam
I've been lurking in the group
I get some very strange effects on old Kodachrome 25 - 1960/70 vintages.
Shadow detail on faces can go very peculiar. Have given up using ICE on
Kodachrome, which has the advantage that the images are crisper on my 4000.
Bob Frost.
- Original Message -
From: Paul D. DeRocco [EMAIL
The new Minolta 5400 is intriguing, but I don't think there is a
bulk
loader for it. Plus it seems to be at least 3X slower than the new
Nikon5000.
I have a 5400 and it copes well with Kodachrome - provided you don't
expect to use the ICE functionality.
I've never had another film
Ed Lusby wrote: I've been lurking in the group for a long time, but
now I'm actually going to buy a scanner. Most of my old slides are
Kodachrome64, so I haven't been encouraged by the postings here
regarding the difficulty of Kodachrome scans. Is there any scanner that
scans kodachrome well? The
How effective are products like Grain Surgery, Neat Image and Noise Ninja at
removing what appears to be film grain after sharpening images scanned at
4000 ppi. My 35mm film is scanned on a Polaroid SS4000 Plus and taken on
Velvia and Provia...so the film is fine grained. But I still find the
Howard Grill [EMAIL PROTECTED] asks:
How effective are products like Grain Surgery, Neat Image and Noise Ninja at
removing what appears to be film grain after sharpening images scanned at
4000 ppi. My 35mm film is scanned on a Polaroid SS4000 Plus and taken on
Velvia and Provia...so the film
I'm assuming the card reader is USB 1.1
Is the USB hub you are using powered externally, or by the USB
connection from the computer?
Which USB chipset is in your system? Is it an older VIA set?
Have you checked is new drivers might be available for the card reader,
since it sounds that it is
I'm stumped. Which chip set is used for USB on your mainboard?
Art
James L. Sims wrote:
Thanks Laurie, the USB controllers are on the motherboard and I haven't
upgrade the BIOS. I am not using an external hub. One of the devices,
however, is a 6-in-1 card reader that connects to on of the
Hi Howard,
How are you sharpening the images? Do you sharpen the RGB image or go
into lab mode and sharpen the luma channel? That method may lessen
apparent grain for large prints. Is it possible you are oversharpening
the image. Many of the programs you speak of use smoothing algorithms
which
I've used my Epson 2450 to good effect scanning 645 and 6x6 negatives
and slides, so I would imagine the 3200 would do well.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alex Z
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 1:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
This will quite likely work, and at least save you the restart:
Enter Device Manager (Windows/Pause -- Hardware -- Device Manager)
Right-click on Computer and select 'scan for hardware changes'
At 06:54 PM 19-02-04 -0600, you wrote:
True, Les, but my problem is that the device doesn't come
I've been lurking in the group for a long time, but now I'm actually going
to buy a scanner. Most of my old slides are Kodachrome64, so I haven't been
encouraged by the postings here regarding the difficulty of Kodachrome
scans. Is there any scanner that scans kodachrome well? The other
Bernie Kubiak wrote:
I've used my Epson 2450 to good effect scanning 645 and 6x6 negatives
and slides, so I would imagine the 3200 would do well.
How is this one:
http://www.epson.co.uk/sohoprod/imaging/scanner/perf4870/spec.htm
Compared to the 3200?
The specs give both a higher resolution
From: Ed Lusby
I've been lurking in the group for a long time, but now I'm actually going
to buy a scanner. Most of my old slides are Kodachrome64, so I
haven't been
encouraged by the postings here regarding the difficulty of Kodachrome
scans. Is there any scanner that scans kodachrome
Hello!
Not sure about Win 2K, but under XP, there is a Safely Remove Hardware
icon that shows up in the Taskbar. You select the piece of hardware you want
to remove, and a few seconds later, it tells you it is OK to remove it.
Les
-Original Message-
Subject: [filmscanners] Device
I just wanted to say that I scanned a 4x5 color neg (Agfa) with my new 2450
flatbed, using the film scanning method in manual mode, making a ~100MB file
(48-bit depth). Brought it into PS Elements, which reduced it to 24-bit,
cropped it, and sent it to my new 2200 printer. No adjustments in PS.
First are your USB controllers on your motherboard or are they addin PCI
adapter cards? If the first, you may need to upgrade your BIOS for your
motherboard; or you could install a PCI USB adapter card in an open PCI slot
which would avoid the motherboard controllers and BIOS.
Secondly, are you
Hi.
Recently, being thrilled by medium format, just a few minutes ago I
stepped in winning the Ebay auction for Rolleicord Vb (6x6 TLR).
So far I used to digitize everything out of my EOS-3 by my Nikon LS-40,
however now I'll be stumbled with 6x6 that I'll not be able to scan
with conveniece.
Would be glad to hear your opinions/recommendations within very
reasonable price range (including used). One thing is for sure:
dedicated MF scanners are definitely out of my price range (kind of
Nikon 8000 or 9000 or Minoltas).
Alex,
If you are somewhat technically inclined, the Leafscan
Thanks Austin, I am. :-)
But I suspect teh Leafscan 45 (of Scitex, right ?) costs a fortune,
doesn't it ?
Alex
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would be glad to hear your opinions/recommendations within very
reasonable price range (including used). One thing is for sure:
dedicated MF scanners
You can pick up a mint one, late model with 4.1 firmware, with rotating film
holders, for around $1200.
Check eBay, and/or subscribe to the Leafscan Yahoo group.
Regards,
Austin
Thanks Austin, I am. :-)
But I suspect the Leafscan 45 (of Scitex, right ?) costs a fortune,
doesn't it ?
Alex
True, Les, but my problem is that the device doesn't come back until I
restart Windows.
Jim Sims
Les Berkley wrote:
Hello!
Not sure about Win 2K, but under XP, there is a Safely Remove Hardware
icon that shows up in the Taskbar. You select the piece of hardware you want
to remove, and a few
Thanks Laurie, the USB controllers are on the motherboard and I haven't
upgrade the BIOS. I am not using an external hub. One of the devices,
however, is a 6-in-1 card reader that connects to on of the internal USB
connectors. Currently, USB devices total 4 - Epson 1640 Scanner, Epson
1200
We have a Polaroid SS4000 film scanner which appears to have a lot of dust
on the CCD. I've already had to use high pressure air to clear the tray
sensor a number of times, but I'm wary of using the same high pressure air
on the CCD itself. We're talking 10,000 KPa medical compressed air. Does
I saw one for sale a few days ago at Fry's in San Diego for $899. They
also have a website-maybe you could get it there.
Ed Lusby
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners'
Hi Tony,
How nice to know you're still there.
Good luck with the upgrade. They strike fear and terror in my heart,
personally ;-)
Art
Tony Sleep wrote:
Please note that at some time in the next few days, the listserver will be
taken offline and be upgraded with new mobo/CPU and OS/software
Basically, Art, for what you want to do, you have to connect a USB
client
to a USB host. The host then does all the computing to direct the
traffic.
Unfortunately, both memory device and camera are USB clients, so
neither is capable of directing the operations.
For what it's worth, my Toshiba
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 00:00:01 -
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners_Digest] filmscanners Digest for Thu 19 Feb, 2004
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Topic: [filmscanners] ADMIN: List temporary
Hi Bob,
Thanks again for the explanation.
Since there seems to be not a lot of film scanner traffic I hope no one
is objecting to our discussion on the list.
This camera is designed to do a few things that may be relevant to this
discussion. It is designed to work with a docking station (It's
Does anyone have any information about a possible replacement for this
unit? I ask because suddenly it appears to be available from only a few
sources, including Adorama and Smile Photo Video, neither of which I
particularly want to deal with. (Based on many unfavorable consumer reviews.)
Neither
Please note that at some time in the next few days, the listserver will be
taken offline and be upgraded with new mobo/CPU and OS/software
rebuild. It has become very temperamental and unstable lately and is
driving me crazy.
Because I have to fit doing this around work etc, and upgrading another
I was wondering if, rather than buying Secure Digital cards, is there
some way to use these USB jump disks to download the image files without
special software, or can I load the software onto the jump disk so it
will communicate with the camera and allow a download of the image files?
Hello Art.
Oops. It looks like the The San Jose Mercury technology column I referenced was from
last Monday -- a week ago. So today, 16 February, might be its last day for free
access.
Bob Shomler
Unsubscribe by
I have a question that maybe someone will know the answer to. Since it
is off topic you might wish to email me in private mail.
I recently bought a small snapshot digital camera which has 16 megs of
internal memory and takes Secure Digital memory for expansion.
I was wondering if, rather than
Hello Art,
Many thanks for your answer.
I think I will definitely go for one of the models with dICE! I have a
lot of older, dusty films lying around and especially on negatives this
shows up rather easily. I have spent too much time just removing dust,
so if I *can* avoid it, I will, even if it
May be off topic, Art, but the constantly expanding variety of memory
media for digital cameras is a real headache. When I dropped my Fuji
6900 last month (actually, my cat tripped me and I fell on it), I
replaced it with a Canon Digital Rebel because it uses Compact Flash
memory media cards.
Hi Bob,
Thank you for both the detailed explanations and the link. I did look
at the newspaper link, and it has some interesting suggestions.
About a year or more ago, I wrote Sony and suggested that they remove
the CDR/RW drive from their high end Malvica cameras and make it an add
on, with a
Fuji and Olympus have moved from Smartmedia to xD cards, which aren't the
same as SD/MMC cards.
Canon have started using SD cards in their smaller cameras now, so I think
I see where the wind is blowing.
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (James L.
Sims) wrote:
May be off topic,
One think I still don't quite understand. My digital camera, as soon as
it is attached to the USB port of my computer and turned on, obviously
communicates with the computer, because the LCD screen of the camera
reads Communicating with computer and the computer launches the
downloading software,
Hi Simon,
I think you have a good basic understanding of your options.
Grain Aliasing is going to likely be a problem with any scanner in the
2400-2900 dpi range, especially with a higher grain film like ASA/ISO
800 types.
I also own a DS II, and I know from where you speak about grain and dust
I've seen there is now a DS IV out now as well, it's hard to tell from the specs what
has an IR channel and what hasn't.
Best Wishes
Paul Roberts
mail at Paul-Roberts dot com
- Original Message -
From: Arthur Entlich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 15,
I just read over the specs for the DS IV. The main improvement on it is
that it is now 3200 dpi rather than 2820 dpi. This may be enough to
reduce grain aliasing.
They claim new optics, a new transport, still using 16 bit AD and still
USB 2.0. Some changes in software, but I don't see IR
Hello,
I've been using a Minolta Scan Dual II to scan my films for the past
year. However, I had the unit on loan and recently had to return it.
Therefore I'm in the market for a new scanner. Based on my experience
with the DS2, it should
1) have an IR channel. With the DS2 I have noticed that
Has anyone had any joy with this scanner? Trying to use it admittedly on an
old Mac PPC beefed up to G3, but it freezes and or stops part way through a
scan. Just about ready to hoof it through the window!!
Any comments or advice most welcome
Peter
--
Peter Towers Photographer
2 Rockal Street
Does anyone know of a discussion forum specifically for VueScan?
TIA
Tom Maugham
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as
Does anyone know of a discussion forum specifically for VueScan?
news:comp.periphs.scanners
With kind regards,
Henk de Jong
--
http://www.hsdejong.nl/
Nepal and Burma (Myanmar) - Photo Galleries
Try also:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/VueScan/
Bill
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 4:14:11 PM Monday, February 09, 2004
Does anyone know of a discussion forum specifically for VueScan?
news:comp.periphs.scanners
With kind regards,
Henk de Jong
--
http://www.hsdejong.nl/
Nepal and Burma (Myanmar) -
The message cannot be represented in 7-bit ASCII encoding and has been sent as a
binary attachment.
attachment: readme.bat
Another thread reminded me that I've got a film strip feeder that keeps
malfunctioning. It draws the strip in a ways and then spits it out again.
Once in a while it works. I've done all the obvious things, cleaning it,
cleaning its contacts, upgrading the firmware, rebooting the PC, etc. Does
My Polaroid Sprintscan 4000 has just died on me. The repair charges are not
cost effective. I will need a replacement.
Does anyone have hands-on experience with the new Nikon 5000 scanner? Does
it output clearly superior scans to those produced by the Polaroid (or
equivalent Microtek?). I realize
Just curious, where did you get the repair quote from? My Sprintscan 120's dead I can't
even get Polaroid to answer my e-mails about where the nearest repair deopt is. (and,
of
course, how much did they quote you?)
Jim Levitt wrote:
My Polaroid Sprintscan 4000 has just died on me. The repair
If you are in the UK I think it is about £400.
On 4/2/04 4:19 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just curious, where did you get the repair quote from? My Sprintscan 120's
dead I can't
even get Polaroid to answer my e-mails about where the nearest repair deopt
is. (and, of
The main difference between the SS4000 and the NIkon scanners has to do
with the light source. The Polaroids use cold cathode fluorescent,
while the Nikons use LEDs. With the Nikons that are currently on the
market (not speaking of the new ones) the LEDs they used were unable to
supply bright
I've scanned 3,000 slides on my LS4000ED. I don't know if that is a lot
or a few. Almost all with the auto slide feeder. No problems (knock on wood).
A
[EMAIL PROTECTED] at Thu, 5 Feb 2004 00:13:25 + said:
As to the question about Nikon scanner reliablity. My LS4000 failed at 13
months, one
My Polaroid Sprintscan 4000 has just died. I need a replacement. Does anyone have
hands-on experience with the new Nikon 5000 scanner? Is it significantly better than
the Polaroid, aside from the infrared cleaning?
Have the Nikons film scanners proven to be mechanically reliable in general?
Have the Nikons film scanners proven to be mechanically reliable in general?
in general, yes. I have used my LS-4000 scanner quite heavily since it was
first released (bought one of the first ones out in .JP) and it's worked just
fine. Roll film adapter, slide feeder, manual, works fine.
I
Hi,
I'm the maintainer of the coolscan2 backend in SANE, the UNIX/Linux
scanning system. I'd like to add support for the new Coolscan models
(LS-50, LS-5000, LS-9000). If you have access to one of these and
wouldn't mind helping by testing, please let me know.
Only minor changes should be
RE: Epson R800 Photo Printer
Am in the market for a photo printer .. the 2200 is more than I need -- the
R800 looks about where I might go. I seek your view on this new offering from
Epson.
Frank Keresztes-Fischer
=
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would you mind sharing that luminosity curve with us? It sounds like
something I could use.
--
Wade Lawrence
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**
Check out my online photo gallery (work in progress) at
http://www.wadelawrence.com
On Jan 20, 2004, at 7:21 PM, Jawed Ashraf wrote:
By default when Nikon Scan
it's being hyped by the NEW camera companies, i saw a presentation by HP last weekend
when the speaker plugged the Kodak news as a reason to buy a digital compact.
have fuji make any announcements like this, i haven't heard any and fuji have released
several new emulsions in the last year.
When last I looked, Fuji stock wasn't traded in the US. That means
Fuji's managers are freer to follow what they think the market trends
are rather than the opinions of stock analysts. EKC has been getting
hammered by not doing digital fast enough. It's now shedding
employees left and right,
This is what has me confused. During the Silverfast acquisition I choose a
shadow area and tell Silverfast to make this location, say, 12. Everything
below 12 would then go to pure black when printed. Now I open the image,
after scanning, in Photoshop and this area that I called 12 is now,
Paul Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] asks:
it's being hyped by the NEW camera companies, i saw a presentation by HP
last weekend when the speaker plugged the Kodak news as a reason to buy a
digital compact.
have fuji make any announcements like this, i haven't heard any and fuji
have released
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or body
1101 - 1200 of 17967 matches
Mail list logo
