masks. I expect I'll have to separate them from the neg masks in
>order to scan them -- which will make the Ilfochrome printer (Rob at the
>Lightroom in Berkeley) none too happy when I take them to him for more
>prints.
>
>What have I overlooked?
>
>Thanks & salutations, David Lewiston
--
==
Bill Fernandez * User Interface Architect * Bill Fernandez Design
(505) 346-3080 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://billfernandez.com
==
lity of your presence here. It's
tough to be on the firing line with end users and I think you've done
a great job of being appropriate and sane.
Regards,
--Bill
--
======
Bill Fernandez * User Interface Architect
quot;copyright 1998-2001 Nikon Inc."
--Bill
--
======
Bill Fernandez * User Interface Architect * Bill Fernandez Design
(505) 346-3080 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://billfernandez.com
==
hat size)
BF: yes it's good enough.
>or 4000 dpi would gain quality noticeably ?
BF: yes you'll notice a difference.
--
==========
Bill Fernandez * User Interface Architect * Bill Fernandez Design
(505) 346-3080 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://billfernandez.com
==
nds.
>Searching net to any scanner's related information I run onto new Canon's
>product: Canon FS 4000US.
--
==
Bill Fernandez * User Interface Architect * Bill Fernandez Design
(505) 346-3080 * [EMAIL
;the scanners).
>3. Lack of multipassing capability like of Minolta Elite and Elite II.
--
==
Bill Fernandez * User Interface Architect * Bill Fernandez Design
(505) 346-3080 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://billfernandez.com
==
fuzzy at other places (e.g. in the
center).
>It would be interesting to compare dynamic ranges of FS4000US and SS4000
>though...
BF: The shadow detail (and by implication the dynamic range) on the
Polariod was noticeably better.
--
==
ased work.
>
>Thanks in advance.
>
>Glenn
--
======
Bill Fernandez * User Interface Architect * Bill Fernandez Design
(505) 346-3080 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://billfernandez.com
==
much better.
(2) Be sure that if you scan with the film type set in NikonScan to
"Kodachrome" you use your Kodachrome custom profile. Same for the
"Positive" setting.
--
==
Bill Fernandez * User Interface Architect * Bill Fernandez Design
(505) 346-3080 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://billfernandez.com
==
the
>US/GBP exchange rate at the moment - it works out to about 575GBP, which
>...
>3. Any other ideas for scanners which might be slightly cheaper, before
>I commit myself?
--
======
Bill Fernandez * User Interface Arch
at one. Does it have batch scanning
>capabilities?
>
>Thanks
>
>Mark
--
==========
Bill Fernandez * User Interface Architect * Bill Fernandez Design
(505) 346-3080 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://billfernandez.com
==
ll the time.
>
>please see my next post on highlight detail and GEM though - my 2 cents...
--
======
Bill Fernandez * User Interface Architect * Bill Fernandez Design
(505) 346-3080 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://billfernandez.com
==
e a wonderful (and rejuvinating time :-).
--
======
Bill Fernandez * User Interface Architect * Bill Fernandez Design
(505) 346-3080 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://billfernandez.com
==
gt; I'm thinking of buying a 19" monitor to go along with an aging 17"
>Panasonic..
--
======
Bill Fernandez * User Interface Architect * Bill Fernandez Design
(505) 346-3080 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://billfernandez.com
==
than the bottom. However, when I last looked
>into this, I couldn't find reliable heuristics. If someone can send me
>a pointer to studies on this, I'll look into it again.
>
>Regards,
>Ed Hamrick
--
==
Bill Fern
on on film flatness has been explained before, so this will be my
final word on the topic
--
======
Bill Fernandez * User Interface Architect * Bill Fernandez Design
(505) 346-3080 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://billfernandez.com
==
er?user_id=402251
>
>And a primitive template-based website. URL is in my sig.
>
>Thanks very much. I promise to try not to ask the 14,000 most asked
>newbie questions.
>
>
>Ken Durling
>
>Website http://home.earthlink.net/~kdurling/
>
>Alternate e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
==
Bill Fernandez * User Interface Architect * Bill Fernandez Design
(505) 346-3080 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://billfernandez.com
==
27;d TIFs), and
>I am now moving over to PNG's for my own file storage in order to
>save CD space. The lack of 48-bit quality hasn't yet been an issue
>for me..
>
>mt
--
==
Bill Fernandez * User Interface Architect * Bill Fernandez Design
(505) 346-3080 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://billfernandez.com
==
find exactly the same problem with plastic mounted kodachromes?
>
>The other thought: all the posts complaining about this issue have been from
>4000 owners too. none from 8000 people. hmmm.
--
==
Bill Fernandez * User
he pre-save data.
>
>If you do try to save/close/re-open JPEG12 and do a difference with the
>original PSD/BMP/TIF you will find there is a difference.
--
======
Bill Fernandez * User Interface Architect * Bill Fernand
gt;bit Microtek Scanmaker X12 USL scanner, and it works well.
--
==
Bill Fernandez * User Interface Architect * Bill Fernandez Design
(505) 346-3080 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://billfernandez.com
==
ndard deviation data. The problem is it's hard to tell how much
>of the standard deviation is film grain and how much is scanner noise.
>Most of the IV ED deviation is film grain. The Stouffer target has large
>grain.
--
========
this the wrong way?
Regards,
--Bill
At 1:10 AM -0400 23-10-01, SKID Photography wrote:
>Bill Fernandez wrote:
>
> > I've became aware of this when I was doing similar analysis recently;
>> that much of the apparent "scanner noise" was in fact film grain.
n out of town.need to
>catch up! Thanks!
--
==
Bill Fernandez * User Interface Architect * Bill Fernandez Design
(505) 346-3080 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://billfernandez.com
==
ng up in the
>dense shadows from the greater
enlargements (samples) was due to the problem of electronic noise,
and not, in fact grain...
>Bill Fernandez wrote:
>...I couldn't understand why
> > two targets of equal density on the same scanner could be so
>> different; un
the same
>density as the larger format, because of the grain (or more
>properly, the space between the grain).
>
>Harvey Ferdschneider
>partner, SKID Photography, NYC
>
>Bill Fernandez wrote:-
>
>> So according to your summary of the discussion on the ColorSync list
>
to the Mac using OS9.2 and
>firewire. I just tried this and it didn't see the scanner. Anyone
>else had any luck?
--
======
Bill Fernandez * User Interface Architect * Bill Fernandez Design
(505) 346-3080 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://billfernandez.com
==
inishing echoes.
>
>I've tried all the controls, but not diminished it at all.
>It doesn't happen with horizontal lines, or off to the left side of
>verticals, just the right.
>
>any ideas?
>or is just a faulty monitor?
>
>paul
--
=====
send to
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>so I can receive them at home , where the scanner is.
>
>Best Regards
>Eric
--
======
Bill Fernandez * User Interface Architect * Bill Fernandez Design
(505) 346-3080 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://billfernandez.com
==
gt;your opinion.
>
> All the reply are welcome,
>thanks a lot.
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>bonjour de ANGOULEME
>
> bernard
--
==
Bill Fernandez * User Interface Architect * Bill Fernandez Design
(505) 346-3080 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://billfernandez.com
==
At 8:49 AM +1000 3-11-01, Rob Geraghty wrote:
>"Bill Fernandez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> o You have to decide whether or not to use ICE and/or GEM BEFORE you
> > scan...
>
>Have you tried Vuescan? With Vuescan you could save raw files and recrop
>
unneeded ones...
--Bill
--
======
Bill Fernandez * User Interface Architect * Bill Fernandez Design
(505) 346-3080 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://billfernandez.com
==
I am still having difficulties.
--
==
Bill Fernandez * User Interface Architect * Bill Fernandez Design
(505) 346-3080 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://billfernandez.com
==
>
>
>
>Photo.net portfolio:
>
>http://www.photo.net/shared/community-member?user_id=402251
--
======
Bill Fernandez * User Interface Architect * Bill Fernandez Design
(505) 346-3080 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://billfernandez.com
==
>6,500K). "
--
======
Bill Fernandez * User Interface Architect * Bill Fernandez Design
(505) 346-3080 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://billfernandez.com
==
my Sony Trinitron (Dell-branded) monitor.
>
>I have a Solux desklamp and I find it provides me with accurate
>renditions of my prints so as to compare them with the screen.
>
>Maris
--
==========
Bill Fernandez * User Inte
and I won't to save the scans in this.
>
>Can any Mac experts tell me how to do this ?
>
>Regards
>Eric
--
======
Bill Fernandez * User Interface Architect * Bill Fernandez Design
(505) 346-3080 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://billfernandez.com
==
(total cost about 650 UK pounds),
>OR buy an internal UltraAta 7200 rpm (total cost about 250 UK
>pounds) ???
>
>Again, we just have to open, retouch and than save our 40mb images,
>but currently I am noticing that is taking a bit to access the HD.
--
====
net portfolio:
>
>http://www.photo.net/shared/community-member?user_id=402251
--
======
Bill Fernandez * User Interface Architect * Bill Fernandez Design
(505) 346-3080 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://billfernandez.com
==
stakes and misinterpreting the results.
Whether it's a problem for you depends on the state of your film, how
much work you're willing to go to (glass mounting all your slides?)
and how demanding you are.
--Bill
--
========
the comments were mild. Other than that I don't
remember anyone anywhere mentioning FOCUS as a problem with the
Polaroid.
--Bill
--
==
Bill Fernandez * User Interface Architect * Bill Fernandez Design
(505) 346-
ld" design is recommended for glass mounted transparencies.
BF: If memory serves correctly this has been the case at least since
the 1970's. Curved field lenses were standard, and flat field lenses
were special orders.
--
=====
ith auto exposure set to "on" - and this is how i make
>all of my scans. will this cause the scanner to read different images in
>different ways such that the profile will have varying degrees of "fit".
>how do you have this set?
--
======
& slides. A
>cursory search of specs leaves me quite confused. Can anyone clarify this?
>
> Ian B
--
======
Bill Fernandez * User Interface Architect * Bill Fernandez Design
(505) 346-3080 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://billfernandez.com
==
l to be less trial and error, and better color.
>
>Thanks,
>Berry
>
--
======
Bill Fernandez * User Interface Architect * Bill Fernandez Design
(505) 346-3080 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://billfernandez.com
==
d
>> been striving for in colour
>>
>> but...
>>
>> when I had got the scan a few minutes later, it opened way off in colour
> > (far far too dark, nothing at all like the preview
...
--
==
Bill Fernandez * User Interface Architect * Bill Fernandez Design
(505) 346-3080 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://billfernandez.com
==
e truthful.
BF: At the time I wrote that my monitor was calibrated with
ColorVision's Monitor Spyder and PhotoCal to 6500K at gamma 2.2.
--
======
Bill Fernandez * User Interface Architect * Bill Fernandez Design
(505) 346-3080 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://billfernandez.com
==
can and Photoshop. I get
>the horrible image described above.
--
==========
Bill Fernandez * User Interface Architect * Bill Fernandez Design
(505) 346-3080 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://billfernandez.com
==
photoshop assign the "wide
gamut" profile to the scan.
Good luck,
--Bill
At 9:45 AM -0600 11/28/01, david/lisa soderman wrote:
>
>What about if I have color management *OFF*?
--
======
Bill Fernandez * User I
Finder, find the Photoshop application, select it, from the
File menu choose Get Info > Memory, in the resulting window type
12 into the "Peferred Size:" box.
--Bill
--
==========
Bill Fernandez * User Interface
will scratch the film, although I
haven't used mine enough yet for them to get dirty.
--Bill
--
==
Bill Fernandez * User Interface Architect * Bill Fernandez Design
(505) 346-3080 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://billfernandez.com
==
an produce I scan at the higher
resolution then use Photoshop and bicubic interpolation to sample
down to the optical resolution of my scanner. You might try this and
see what you think.
--Bill
--
==
Bill Fernandez * User Interfa
======
Bill Fernandez * User Interface Architect * Bill Fernandez Design
(505) 346-3080 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://billfernandez.com
==
t;
>PS. I know about LaCie but I'd like to keep the price somewhat reasonable.
--
======
Bill Fernandez * User Interface Architect * Bill Fernandez Design
(505) 346-3080 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://billfernandez.com
==
ng list email directly to my inbox vs. the filmscanner
>list. Can you correct?
--
======
Bill Fernandez * User Interface Architect * Bill Fernandez Design
(505) 346-3080 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://b
er dynamic range, do users find that they can
>extract all the useable shadow detail, and not blow out any highlight detail
>in a single scan with a transparency?
--
======
Bill Fernandez * User Interface Architect * Bill Fe
>Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe
>filmscanners'
>or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message
>title or body
--
==
Bill Fer
These CRTs have a wonderfully sharp display...
BF: Both the above Mitsubishis have/had very sharp display of small
text. Both the above Sonys have/had disturbingly fuzzy display of
small text.
--
======
Bill Fernandez * User Interface
to 100MHz)'
>be sufficient to eliminate the problem.?One post suggested not because
>the cutoff starts too high.
--
======
Bill Fernandez * User In
need to scan.
--
======
Bill Fernandez * User Interface Architect * Bill Fernandez Design
(505) 346-3080 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://billf
Bill Fernandez * User Interface Architect * Bill Fernandez Design
(505) 346-3080 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://billfernande
scanner and began to try to obtain a
>profile for Kodachrome scans.
--
==
Bill Fernandez * User Interface Architect * Bill Fernandez Design
(505) 346-3080 * [EMAIL PROTECTE
about Kodachrome, so he'd
need a Kodachrome IT8 target.
--Bill
At 11:10 PM +0100 4/22/04, Al Bond wrote:
>Bill Fernandez wrote:
>
>> I made
>> using a Kodachrome IT8 target and the ICC Scan software from
>> profilecity.com
>
>I haven't heard of this
... If the the
>profiles could be converted in Photoshop in a batch mode, that would
>be a viable alternative for me. Is that possible?
--
======
Bill Fernandez * User Interface Architect * Bill Fernandez Design
(505) 346-3080
last.
--Bill
--
==
Bill Fernandez * User Interface Architect * Bill Fernandez Design
(505) 346-3080 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://bi
. It makes scanning
>xpan shots for stitching more difficult. Has anyone else experienced
>this problem? Any suggestions are very welcome.
--
======
Bill Fernandez * User Interface Architect * Bill Fernandez Design
(505) 346-3
tried using curves in Photoshop to uncompress the highlights
>and spread them back into the midtones. However, I still can't get a natural
>looking result.
>
>Has anyone got any tips or suggestions on anything else I can try?
--
===
27;ll find several ways to approach this.
--Bill
At 11:19 PM + 11/24/04, Al Bond wrote:
>Bill Fernandez wrote:
>
>> My Nikon LS4000 has analog gain controls accessible through the Nikon
>> scanner driver. I can sometimes turn down the anaalog gain to get
>> more detail i
e) are using Colorsync.
>
>If so, what settings are you using in Nikon Scan etc for color management?
>
>Thanks,
>
>Berry
--
======
Bill Fernandez * User Interface Architect * Bill Fernandez Design
(505) 346-
range of these scanners? How is dynamic
>range measured?
--
======
Bill Fernandez * User Interface Architect * Bill Fernandez Design
(505) 346-3080 * bf
70 matches
Mail list logo
