I am looking to buy another printer. I currently have an HP970cxi which
has PhotoREt III technology (HP's latest three color + black) and I
think it prints great. I have not seen a side by side comparison of the
HP's vs the Epson's. I have heard a lot of talk about the Epson 1270 on
this list,
RFS3600 owners there are software and firmware updates available at the
Kodak web site.
http://www.kodak.com/global/en/service/software/rfs3600/hostOverview3600.shtml
Dan
Thank you all, for the suggestions. I will try them one at a time until
I get the results I am seeking.
Again Thanks,
Dan
Spencer,
Just out of curiosity, how fast are you able to scan the images? I am
running a AMD K6 450 with 384M of ram. I am able to prescan a roll of 36
between 10 and 11 minutes, and it is taking me just over 2 hours for the
strip to be scanned at 3600 dpi.
I too am running an AMD 450
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had heard that Kodak has been having some problems with the rfs3600
software. Just can't understand why these things aren't thoughly field tested
before being released to the public. Since I am not that knowledgable about
computerease. It does concern me.
Dave,
I
My filmstrips sometimes look like there is still some chemicals left on
them from processing. How can I get my filmstrips squeaky clean for
scanning? This includes dust and finger prints also.
Thanks in advance,
Dan
any computer lockups bad enough to cause a reboot. I
have had to uninstall and re-install once or twice though.
Dan Kimble
Sumtingwong wrote:
Dave,
I just happen to be the owner of both (well almost) of those scanners. I
have the older Dimage Scan Dual, which I was very happy
if
there is not some sort of conflict within these systems.
curiously,
Dan Kimble
OK Photo wrote:
Just received our 3600 yesterday. (in Canada)
Once install was done I attempted my first scan.
As soon as I clicked one import/twain, the whole system
locked up. (PC)
Happened with both USB SCSI
Tony Sleep wrote:
I stand by my conclusions that, for correctly exposed originals and sensible black
point settings, the Polaroid 4000 is the lowest noise unit I have looked at so far,
Could some one please tell me how to measure the noise created by a film
scanner and why it is so important?
Thanks for info. Now all I need is some decent images. I will try to
create some soon.
Dan
=shAf= wrote:
Dan Kimble writes ...
Tony Sleep wrote:
I stand by my conclusions that, for correctly exposed originals
and sensible black
point settings, the Polaroid 4000 is the lowest
that there would
be another software and firmware version
released in a few weeks. I don't know if
that statement implies that a change in
this area is coming or not.
HTH
Dan Kimble
Bob Shomler wrote:
They have a quick start guide, but no manual. It is a
.pdf. I LIKE paper in this respect
Please let me know what you think about
the noise generated by the SS4000. I'm
curious because I returned a SS4000
because I felt it was noisy and did not
sound good mechanically. I'm happier
with the RFS 3600
Dan Kimble
Trozzo wrote:
I had one. I sent it back for the SS4000. I may have
Tomasz Chady wrote:
Hi Dan,
Sorry for disturbing you but I am going to buy RFS3600 (or SS4000) but I
still have some questions.
Could you please tell me :
is it possible to use manual focus
is it possible to upload somewhere manual and English driver
If it is not so difficult, could
BH Photo in New York city
Dan
OK Photo wrote:
Dan, would you mind telling me where you
purchased your 3600?
Still no sign of it showing up in Canada.
Paul
http://okphoto.webjump.com
P:250-498-2800 F:250-498-6876
lary concerned about the max resolution
scan (50 Mo), with and without auto-correction features. Also, how is the
film autofeeder doing with uncut 36 fr. roll?
--
Have a good day!
Raymond Carles
On Sat, 4 Nov 2000 01:59:13 -0600, Dan Kimble wrote:
I'm Sorry David but that is not true.
Sorry, but I don't have any BW negatives to test, but I do have a roll
of that Kodak BW film that uses the C-41 process. I will shoot it when
I have a chance and try it.
One thing I forgot to mention in the previous post is that so far every
frame I have scanned needed very little if any
of corrections
(more than I'm capable of correcting).
3. I'm also wondering if I should have waited for the Kodak RFS 3600 (it
is not too late to return this one)
Thanks in advance,
Dan Kimble
The filmscanners mailing list is hosted
17 matches
Mail list logo
