Please let me know what you think about
the noise generated by the SS4000. I'm
curious because I returned a SS4000
because I felt it was noisy and did not
sound good mechanically. I'm happier
with the RFS 3600
Dan Kimble
Trozzo wrote:
>
> I had one. I sent it back for the SS4000. I may have had a bad unit, but
> it crashed my Mac G3 every third time I tried to acquire the scanner's
> software from within Photoshop. It seems to be memory hungry. My unit
> sounded like a jack hammer when it scanned. It could have had an
> internal problem. Non the less the scans where noisy--(grain). The
> colors where vivid but blotchy. I could not get a good scan using the
> different CMSs. It only worked well on the default settings. I have used
> a leafscan 35, a polariod sprintscan 35, and an RFS 2035. I felt that
> the scans from the 3600 left something lacking--detail. The edges of
> objects in the scan seemed rough and blended together to much when you
> zoom in on the image. However I was able to make some nice Epson 1200
> prints from the scans. I think Kodak has some bugs to iron out with the
> 3600.
>
> I have just set up the SS4000. I can't wait to compare the two.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Bob has anyone done a review on the rfs3600 yet? Or any first hand
> > experience using it?
> > Dave Small
