>don't think they will be too unreliable.
>
>Steve
Herm
Astropics http://home.att.net/~hermperez
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners'
or 'unsub
something wrong, or is there another way to combine images?
Herm
Astropics http://home.att.net/~hermperez
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners'
or 'unsub
, the performance benefits disappear in the mix when you use
>the thing for real.
Herm
Astropics http://home.att.net/~hermperez
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe' in the title or
body
l allow you to "always open with" whatever program you
>choose. Do this for both JPGs and TIFs ... you may have to re-boot for it to
>take effect.
Herm
Astropics http://home.att.net/~hermperez
How do I do this?
Herm
Astropics http://home.att.net/~hermperez
t in a rural area.
>
>Any ideas? For my low volume, I've gotten to be an expert spotter.
Herm
Astropics http://home.att.net/~hermperez
.. yuchh!!
Arthur Entlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>For people who do NOT have Minolta Dual Dimage II scanners, do you have
>one or more lazy or bad sensors in your CCD array, and if so, do you
>consider that an acceptable defect and have you decided not to exchange
>it?
H
to map the aberrations of the lens system. It would
>be wonderful if it could be used in a scanner, because theoretically it
>ought to be possible to remove aliasing and lens aberrations from the scanner
>optics.
>
>(but I've discussed it before and I won't bore everyone
s" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I am in need of a film scanner. As I have a low budget, I have
>narrowed my choices down to the Canon 2710, the Acer 2720S, the
>Acer 2740s or the Minolta Scan Dual II.
Herm
Astropics http://home.att.net/~hermperez
27;re looking at. Is there anyone on the list
>with a 2710 or 2720 who has scanned B&W slides?
Herm
Astropics http://home.att.net/~hermperez
secrets that might help with slides other than getting them cut
>and sleeved instead of mounted?
Herm
Astropics http://home.att.net/~hermperez
CTED]> wrote:
>I was planning on getting a 1GHz Athlon with 512MB of RAM and running under
>Windows 2000. The Nikon Coolscan produces file sizes of around 70MB, so a
>lot of fast RAM is important. Can anyone see any problems with this spec.
Herm
Astropics http://home.att.net/~hermperez
setting too high.. normally I set it between 1 to 2, mostly 1.5 with semi dark
slides. If you want send me a screen capture of the histogram of one of your
slides.. plus a copy of the Vuescan ini file with the settings you used.
Herm
Astropics http://home.att.net/~hermperez
ved
>settings for MiraPhoto as a basis for me to experiment on?
>
>TIA,
>Jan
Herm
Astropics http://home.att.net/~hermperez
> wrote:
>think how many more Ed would sell if it had a KILLER interface
>
>how much nicer life would be
>
>and how little effort it would take
Herm
Astropics http://home.att.net/~hermperez
anner and nikon and vuescan
>software, what would be the best place to start to extract the images from the film.
>
>The images were shot underwater documenting coral diseases. I am not so concerned
>about quality as the ability to see diseased coral. It is just too hard to go reshoot.
Her
Peter can still outrun me even with two broken legs.. perhaps if I shoot him?
"Jawed Ashraf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Watch-out, Peter, that's a coded-reply meaning Herm is gonna come round and
>break your legs - so you can't chase him as he runs off with you
ted problems should not be an issue.
>
>Take nothing for granted! Try it without the UPS. I have 2 machines
>plugged into an APC420 which mysteriously reset once in a while, though
>the monitoring s/w reports no incidents, and they are never affected at
>the same time.
>
anner with the best price/performance ratio in the
>market. My should come in 3-5 days.
Herm
Astropics http://home.att.net/~hermperez
S20.. horrible
registration.
"Frank Nichols" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>The reason I
>said "appears" is that I assume there is some slack or play in the transport
>mechanism and perfect can not be achivied.
Herm
Astropics http://home.att.net/~hermperez
Yeah, it is. And it's fixable, too. Have I seen
>anybody trying to do so, lately? Nuh-uh. AFAIC, the mfgrs are just cutting
>to deep to be competitive--they're cutting the product, cutting the user,
>and ultimately cutting themselves, IMHO.
>
>Best regards--LRA
Herm
Astropics http://home.att.net/~hermperez
g and the alignment
>appears to be perfect.
>
>/fn
Herm
Astropics http://home.att.net/~hermperez
which causes the focus/exposure to
>vary across the image - again, I would expect this to show up on other
>images. However, if it is just a small effect, it could only show up in
>cases of very low level signals - ie. dense areas of the negative.
Herm
Astropics http://home.att.net/~hermperez
>As I write this, I'm scanning one of my favorite (old)
>images to see if the Nikon can improve on earlier scans.
>What a pity -- the image is on Kodak Gold 400, and the
>grain is just awful.
>
>
>rafe b.
Herm
Astropics http://home.att.net/~hermperez
e:
>My guess is you are not an electrical engineer, or you would know that LEDs
>do have a life span. Because you haven't heard of them burning out, doesn't
>mean they don't burn out.
Herm
Astropics http://home.att.net/~hermperez
lab
in a small town.
"Lynn Allen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Uh, this is probably a really dumb question, but what steps would you use to
>get this pushed-film processed, given the technology likely available in a
>small town?
Herm
Astropics http://home.att.net/~hermperez
graphy
that I do. Here is the FAQ on Ektachrome E200 film:
http://www.kodak.com/cluster/global/en/professional/products/films/e200/qAndA.jhtml
Herm
Astropics http://home.att.net/~hermperez
t;Here's a scan (SS4000) from this film:
>
>http://www.millennics.com/cgi-bin/tope_show_entry.cgi?event=5&pic=29&width=400&height=602
Herm
Astropics http://home.att.net/~hermperez
I have never tried it at 400 so
really cant say.. the other variable to consider is: was the film developed
properly?, sometimes I wonder with the lab I use.. and they have pissed me off
on a couple of occasions. Luckily you can still buy kits and develop the film at
home with better control.
Herm
Astropics http://home.att.net/~hermperez
it pushes nicely from 200 to 400 or 800, but I have only shot it
>at 200.
Herm
Astropics http://home.att.net/~hermperez
a CCD sensor (scanner) on a negative will not bring up what is not on
the film.
Marvin Demuth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Question: Does the same principle of "opening up the shadow details" work
>with scanned negatives?
Herm
Astropics http://home.att.net/~hermperez
t;configured--I'm just using what was in the box. :-)
Herm
Astropics http://home.att.net/~hermperez
/this_is_a_comparison_between_two.htm
Herm
Harry Lehto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Fri, 11 May 2001, shAf wrote:
>
>> To me this implies the problem is with respect to the film ... a
>> problem with the scanner, yes ... but the problem rotates with the
>>
exposure levels and
>combines them into one "longpass" result. It accounts for charge bleeding
>and a number of other issues. The result has none of the gross errors that
>Vuescan currently shows and works far better.
Herm
Astropics http://home.att.net/~hermperez
it would be nice not to have Vuescan include charge bled pixels in its
>output as it currently does. The examples I posted earlier provide enough
>information for a more sophisticated approach. Whether it's worth it or not
>I dunno.
Herm
Astropics http://home.att.net/~hermperez
g and colour restoration in 6.6, I thought I'd give it a
>try.
>
>If you go to http://wordweb.com and click on the "scanning" link in the left
>hand menu, you'll go to a page whih has a comparison half way down between
>Vuescan and Nikonscan.
Herm
Astropics http://home.att.net/~hermperez
gnetting? I don't find the effect objectionable, but are publishers
>really likely to?
Herm
Astropics http://home.att.net/~hermperez
>ago. Before I call Acer I figured that it might be wise to check if others
>have the same problems I have...
>
Herm
Astropics http://home.att.net/~hermperez
AIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>The speculation:
>
>Specialized software might facilitate such registration, even on large
>files. The scientific literature about satellite base photography software
>is replete with discussion of registration technique.
Herm
Astropics http://home.att.net/~hermperez
nter,
>but not the Epson 1200 across the room.
>
>Thanks
>Bill Twieg
Herm
Astropics http://home.att.net/~hermperez
tra 160 doesn't really
>increase the overall speed of your system over SCSI 2 wide, due to the media
>transfer rate issue, unless you run raid 0 or 3.
Herm
Astropics http://home.att.net/~hermperez
run the film through, or a
>scanner who's film holder doesn't slide in end first. I can handle the film
>outside the scanner (currently it goes from a bulk loader through the
>FotoVix onto a bulk loader).
Herm
Astropics http://home.att.net/~hermperez
there is still some chemicals left on
>them from processing. How can I get my filmstrips squeaky clean for
>scanning? This includes dust and finger prints also.
>
>Thanks in advance,
>
>Dan
Herm
Astropics http://home.att.net/~hermperez
available.
"Alan Tyson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Jerry,
>
>I wasn't aware that the Scanwit was particularly bad at
>registration, as I found multiscanning worked well on the
>few occasions I tried it. I think I remember someone here
>6-9 months ago saying
44 matches
Mail list logo
