http://www.freidesignberlin.de/home.php
Unsubscribe by mail to listser...@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body
On Feb 11, 2008 9:48 AM, Bob Geoghegan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While we're talking about SCSI scanners under current OSs, how 'bout Vista?
I'm running an SS4000 on a Win XP laptop through an Adaptec 1480B. The card
is supported under Vista, but I don't know what to expect for the scanner.
On 6/8/07, James L. Sims [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree with you, Tony, Digital cameras, for all practical purposes, has
surpassed the quality of 35mm format film and I believe that happened
with the arrival of the six megapixel camera, a few years ago,
significant cropping, not withstanding
On 6/7/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been having a problem with my Polaroid SprintScan 4000
scanner. Polaroid technical support hasn't been very helpful, so
I'm wondering if someone out there might have experienced this
problem and know something about the
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have just started using my new Sprintscan 4000. before I invest a lot of
time in the learning curve, can anyone recommend which scanner software is
best for which users? Insight and Silversoft are included with the
scanner,
and I could easily get Vuescan.
I have used
Given the heavy slant towards the negative films, in terms of profiles,
makes one wonder if VueScan isn't primarily aimed at negative film scanning
rather than positive film?
Shunith
The recommended setting for slide film under Device/Media Type is Image
rather than Slide Film, which will
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My alibi is that I stated, As a general rule, sharpening shouldn't be done
more than once and even Bruce Fraser indicates that my comments are in
agreement with conventional wisdom. Nevertheless, you and Michael
Shaffer are quite correct in pointing out that there
How are folks using Silverfast unsharp mask vis a vis Photoshop? I'd like
to do some sharpening on the scan side but leave a little final sharpening
to be done in PS. I don't know if this is a good idea or not. In any case,
what looks fairly good to me in Silverfast seems crude and unusable
From: Ian Lyons [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The SS120 produces superior 35mm scans to the SS4000
[snip]
Can you elaborate (since the SS4000 is well-nigh perfect g)?
Joel W.
_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
From: Ian Lyons [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Joel,
Can you elaborate (since the SS4000 is well-nigh perfect g)?
It's closer to perfection.
You write a list of all things you think are great about the SS4000 and
I'll
tell you which have been bettered. I could save you the bother and say that
whatever
E200 does have really fine grain, somewhat at the expense of
resolution/sharpness (as compared to the ASA 100 films).
Joel W.
From: Herm [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I cant tell, is this called accutance? or are you saying that its not as
sharp
as ASA100 slide films?.. in any case I use the film
I am planning on taking pictures at a high school indoor sporting
event with available as well as flash lighting. I have a Canon FS
2710 scanner. I would prefer to use slide film. I have had mixed
results with previous attempts using Fugi and Kodak commercial 400
and 800 print films.(very grainy)
From: Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think there is only one happy scanner owner, Ed, in this forum. He is not
using it mainly for slides though. The rest of people probably own drum
scanners or do not own scanners at all.
I would expect more input from people owning scanners in $600-$1500 price
From: Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writ in part:
I admit it was processed by a non-pro lab, so this ain't scientific
evidence, but I would hesitate to ever use this film again in early morning
or late afternoon light, esp. now after hearing these comments on the list.
Right, but also don't use
From: shAf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: OK, Vuescan is driving me nuts
Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 11:43:30 -0700
Jeffrey writes ...
I suppose I am with Lynn ... afterall, whether you use Vuescan to
crop, or not, it still scans
From: shAf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It would seem a user could crop a small rectangle and ask for a
manual focus ... then crop preferentially and scan with automatic
focus disabled(?) I've never been able to verify if this works ...
even while my LS-2000 goes through the motions, the manual focus
From: Charles Platt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Having only joined this list recently, I don't know if there's been
discussion on Polaroid vs. Nikon 4000 dpi scanners.
I don't think you're going to get a lot of answers because not many of us
with SS4000s are racing off to the Nikon 4000 since it is a
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 3/5/2001 5:33:29 PM EST,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As an alternative to scroll bars, would it be
possible
to use instead a hand to grab the image with the
mouse
and pull it to the location one wants, like
ACDSee?
The problem with
Hello John,
--- John Bradbury [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If all the images are exposed with a varying light
source and some are
backlit Nikonscan is the software to use.
Nikonscan seems to treat each frame with "respect",
Vuescan seems to use the
exposure from the first frame as the norm and
care of it as well.
Joel Wilcox
- Original Message -
From: "Doug" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2000 7:30 PM
Subject: VueScan Epson 636U
I am a VueScan newbie trying to get this up and running for the first
time.
Any help would be greatly a
ce to even it with the adjacent areas. Not very elegant, and not
always perfect, but sometimes it was good enough.
Regards,
Joel Wilcox
The filmscanners mailing list is hosted by http://www.halftone.co.uk
To resign, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] with U
21 matches
Mail list logo
