>A lot of people who talk about "evading" patents are confusing them with
>copyright, which is another thing entirely.
While many people do confuse the two, one must be careful not to assume that
the distinctions and uses of the two which exist in one country hold for
another. I made that mistak
:45 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: open and control
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Laurie Solomon
wrote:
> currently copyrights in the US are valid for the
> life of the originator even if assigned to someone else, I believe, and
are
> renewable for a limited length of
The film sizes for 120 and 620 are the same; it is only the spools that were
different and which accounted for the change in product number.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Lynn Allen
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2001 7:46 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTE
>Unfortunately, I'd have to drive 70 miles--and probably twice that--to buy
a roll of 120 film of any flavor, upping the
>price by 3 gallons of gas!
Unfortunately, unless you live in a big commercial metropolitan area, anyone
would have to drive a few miles to get to a retail outlet that carries
Ever think of doing something similar to split contrast printing as used in
traditional Black & White photographic printing but this time with respect
to color correction. Namely, make adjustment layers for each of the
different items that need a unique color correction, masking off the other
it
Michael,
I am willing to accept what you say about the thickness and length of 620
compared to 120. I just seem to remember reading and hearing that it was
slightly different especially in thickness and maybe length. Well, so much
for relying on memory. :-) Happy to be corrected when wrong; but
Thanks for your input on the Kodachromes. I just noted it to point out that
the statement by Derek Clarke, like most statements of this sort, are true
under certain conditions and not as universal unqualified statements as his
statement implies:"I think you'll find that nothing will last as long
Tony,
While all films today may not be Estar, they are not acetate from what I
understand - may be Mylar or someother plastic base - but I could be wrong
about that.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tony Sleep
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2001
Technically no; but you can probably get away with it if you make them low
resolution thumbnails, since you are using the images to advertise the
selling of supposedly legitimate original prints or copy prints which the
scans represent and not the scans themselves or prints made from the scans.
-
Actually Lynn, if you look at my response, you will find that we are for all
intents and purposes in agreement on this. :-)
Laurie
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Lynn Allen
Sent: Saturday, July 21, 2001 8:35 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subj
>I'm told by those who have that virtually all infringers will
>gladly pay your triple licensing fee in accordance with ASMP and EP
>practice rather than chance a suit over a registered image.
This statement is slightly over-optimistic and a little lacking in
qualifications.
First, it probably i
You might wish to place a
watermark through the image, so the digital file is not reproducible in
any realistic manner.
Art
LAURIE SOLOMON wrote:
>
> Technically no; but you can probably get away with it if you make them low
> resolution thumbnails, since you are using the images to adv
Rob,
Registering a copyright in one country first gives you copyright protection
in that country even if you do not live there or are not a citizen there and
second may give you some legal standing in other countries if you should
wish to bring legal action against someone who has infringed on the
Tony,
The only caveat that I would offer is that, in the US at least, if the image
copyright is registered with the copyright office, there are mandatory costs
and fines associated with copyright infringements independent of damages or
consequential losses. Otherwise I agree with what you have sa
>It's a little hard to tell from your post, but I'm assuming that you are
>not arguing in opposition to registering the copyright on one's images.
Correct.
>If your image is registered, even the "casual image buyer" will have much
>to fear from you, because he will have to pay your court costs.
I am arguing that people should not get their expectations up as to the
nature of the protection that copyright registration provides, the ease of
enforcement, the extent of the costs of insuring against copyright
protection in terms of time and money, and what they anticipate by way of
punitive d
Thank you Terry. It was a very informative treatise and very worthwhile.
There was one sentence that had me wondering: "So, for example, if you're an
Australian trying to assert a copyright against an infringer in the UK, you
go by UK rules; a US registration will probably not help you, unless t
If
memory serves me, I think I remember some discussion about digital Ice not
working all that well on traditional silver black and white negatives because of
the silver which does not allow the infrared to work properly as it would in dye
based films. But I am at the age where I could very
I would think that what you propose would be as much of a pain in the butt
as what you are now doing with your glassless renovation of the original
Minolta holder and would be a lot more messy. I personally use the glass
holder and have had neither any trouble with such things as flatness or
Newt
Funny, I have two systems with more than 512 MB of RAM installed on them and
using Win 98 and have not experienced any problems of the sort you describe.
I have experienced problems with the motherboard not being able to resolve
conflicts in timing between different types of 168 pin DIMMs but no
o
bject: RE: filmscanners: Scanning and memory limits in Windows
On Thu, 26 Jul 2001 01:18:23 -0500 LAURIE SOLOMON ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> One of my systems has 758MB of RAM and
> the other has 640MB of RAM. Maybe I am just lucky. :-)
Or maybe the extra RAM beyond 512Mb doesn't
Rob,
Your explanation sounds like a very reasonable one. I am sure that your
bringing up the issue is appreciated by all on the forum - some of whom
might very well be effected.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rob Geraghty
Sent: Thursday,
o prevent the file cache getting big enough to block
every other process.
File servers are the most likely machines to be afflicted with this problem.
It may come and bite you anytime so unless your feeling really lucky you may
wish to look at my post just above this one.
Steve
- Original Mes
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Hans Rijnbout
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 7:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Wet-mounting slides?
On 26-07-2001, LAURIE SOLOMON wrote:
>I would think that what you propose would be as much of a pain in the butt
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Arthur Entlich
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 2:05 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Digital Copyright
LAURIE SOLOMON wrote:
>
> I am arguing that people should not get their expectations up as to the
> nature of the protec
As I have already said in earlier posts, my experience with ram greater than
512MB on two different Win 98 systems have been different in that I have
been less likely to run out of system resources, get out of RAM messages, or
find the additional RAM to be a waste or unused. Given my experiences
: filmscanners: Scanning and memory limits in Windows
On Thu, 26 Jul 2001 13:03:17 -0500 Laurie Solomon ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> I noticed in both systems that since
> the addition of the RAM the Windows resources meter shows proportionately
> less system resources being used than previ
It seems that some motherboards have energy saving features in their BIOS
which sometimes fight with those of their operating system; the fight can
turn into an all out war when certain devices are used. You might try to
disable alternately the energy saving features of the motherboard using only
; -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Laurie Solomon
> Sent: 26 July 2001 19:03
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: filmscanners: Scanning and memory limits in Windows
>
>
> I have also been told that; but noone has
ECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Scanning and memory limits in Windows
At 11:27 28-07-01 +0100, Tony Sleep wrote:
>On Fri, 27 Jul 2001 16:09:14 -0500 Laurie Solomon ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
>wrote:
>
> > Fine; but what do you suggest as a way to determine if and how the
> > addition
time. Looks
good so far, fingers crossed that I am one of the lucky ones.
Cheers,
Julian
At 12:38 28/07/01, you wrote:
>"Tony Sleep" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, 26 Jul 2001 13:03:17 -0500 Laurie Solomon
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> > wrote:
> > > I
ts in Windows
"Tony Sleep" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Jul 2001 13:03:17 -0500 Laurie Solomon ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> wrote:
> > I noticed in both systems that since
> > the addition of the RAM the Windows resources meter shows
proportionately
> > les
sues with large memory spaces (of
course in 10 years we'll laugh at the present day notions of what large
memory is).
Pat
- Original Message -
From: "LAURIE SOLOMON" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 10:57 PM
Subject: RE: f
: Saturday, July 28, 2001 5:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Scanning and memory limits in Windows
On Fri, 27 Jul 2001 16:09:14 -0500 Laurie Solomon ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> Fine; but what do you suggest as a way to determine if and how the
> additional RAM is being take
It very well could be that the clock and harddrive recognition are based
soley on battery power all the time and do not use power cord power at all,
which would account for the clock slowing down if the batter is going dead
even if the computer is plugged into an active power source.
-Origina
In Minolta's language, the 16-bit lineal is a pure and simple raw scan using
no gamma corrections or any other tone, color or inversing corrections at
all, including any corrections for color negative masks; the 16-bit scan
does do some basic corrections like autofocus ( if selected ), gamma
adjus
What you are getting is basically a raw scan. If you are going to do this,
making corrections and adjustments later in an image editing program, you
should probably make sure that you are getting high bit 16 bit linear scans,
which will involve selecting that option in the Minolta software driver
Just to add something that might make your suggestion clearer. After
selecting the "save as," one will be presented with the file format options
as Roger suggests. It is only after you select the TIFF option for your
file format that the dialog box you are referring to appears. You first
have t
Yes. But two or three a day would be a blessing; try 30-50 a day. I get
Spam mail that automatically reconnects me to my dialup network when I open
it in preview mode to see if I need to delete it. Writing the postmaster
typically does no good since much of this Spam mail is sent via hijacked I
de of the colors visible on
the monitor just as some colors visible on the monitor are not printable
using normal printing processes, i.e. inkjets.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "LAURIE SOLOMON" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, August 12
I do not use Vuescan; but why would an infrared BLACK & WHITE film have a
color mask or need a special setting to remove one? I am unfamiliar with
the film that you are referring to although I do have some familiarity with
infrared B&W film in general.
Unless this Infrared B&W film is a chromoge
TED]]On Behalf Of Stan McQueen
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 10:11 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Vuescan and Kodak Infrared HIE B&W colormask
?
At 07:17 PM 8/14/2001 -0500, Laurie Solomon wrote:
>I do not use Vuescan; but why would an infrared BLACK & WHITE fil
Wedding photography and commercial photography tend to be two very different
types of photography which have very different needs and demands.
Most wedding photographers are selling prints and mostly small size prints
8x10 or smaller with a few wall size enlargements. They have used medium
forma
If you take your 4x5 film and cut it in half, it is. :-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Shough, Dean
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 12:31 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Scanning 4x5 under $500 US?
> Scan Multi is
Yes, I have noticed the same thing happening - especially this evening.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 7:39 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: filmscanners: Re: Duplicate/triplicate message
>Also do you have any idea what the going hourly rate for wedding
>photographer and commercial photographers is?
Depends on a number of variables like location, type of commercial work in
the case of commercial photography, type of weddding coverage in the case of
wedding photography, what is to
>But it seems that one has to cut MF images into separate frames, which is
>nonsense, since MF images are also negatives which are kept in sleeves and
>not only slides in frames.
They are also much larger than 35mm and often cut for automated processing
in aperture cards anyway when returned from
me do individual frames, individual frames in aperture
cards, some entire strips and cut what they desire and some in multiframe
strip. Not much of a trend.
David
-Original Message-
From: Laurie Solomon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 6:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subjec
ject: Re: filmscanners: MF scanner for 120 strips
Laurie Solomon
> When you play with the big boys; you often have to play by the established
> rules of their game not by the rules of some other group of player's game
or
> some other game. :-)
All the big boys I know, including me :-) cut 12
Laurie Solomon ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> They are also much larger than 35mm and often cut for automated
> processing
> in aperture cards anyway when returned from the lab. Many professional
> photographers who tend to be the ones who use medium format films
> generally
&g
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bob Kehl -
Kvernstoen, Kehl & Assoc.
Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2001 3:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: MF scanner for 120 strips
- Original Message -----
From: Laurie Solomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
&g
>how the hell do you make contact prints off a whole roll?
You don't. When you send the film in for processing and proofing, the lab
processes the film and makes individual color corrected 3 1/2 x 5, 5 x 5 or
4 x6 machine made proof prints off the negatives and returns the set of
color corrected
Of Tomasz Zakrzewski
Sent: Sunday, August 19, 2001 1:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: MF scanner for 120 strips
LAURIE SOLOMON wrote:
> >That's what polish professional photographers practice, at least
>
> I assume that is Polish as in Poland and not Po
None of the mentioned scanners. You are probably on the wrong list if
quality is the point and budget is no concern. You probably need to go over
to the high-end drum scanner list and pose your question.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of A
I just bought 256 MB Dimms for $47US each a few weeks ago and the prices
went down since then. Check out www.champaigncomputer.com for RAM, CPU and
other prices. They typically have very good prices on most items. Even if
you do not buy from them their prices can serve as a guideline.
-Ori
judgments.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Arthur Entlich
Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2001 7:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Getting around the firewire problem was Re:
filmscanners:Best film scanner, period!!!
LAURIE SOLOMON wrote:
Really very simple; they use Anti-Newtonian glass as opposed to regular
glass for starters. They might also use an Anti-Newton Rings powder on the
glass between it and the subject being scanned.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of SKID Photog
No, that is not what was said. You can buy some anti-Newtonian glass and
replace your existing glass; or you can use the powder along with your
existing glass. You cannot make anti-Newtonian glass from plain glass by
sprinkling some fairy dust on it in the form of Anti-Newtonian powder; if
you d
Ok Austin, You have just openned a can of worms here. Are we talking about
sharpness as seen through a loup, from a monitor, off a light table,
photographic print or inkjet print? Is the comparison based on each coming
from the same type of source and under the same lighting; or are we
comparing
Not totally (which should not surprise you); but we are getting there. :-)
If I understand your requirements, each film should contain the same
photograph of the same subject taken at the same time (so to speak) under
the exact same lighting with the same or equivalent equipment. In addition;
eac
That's nice; but pardon my ignorance, what is an MTF spec?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mike Duncan
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 11:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Sharpness of color chrome vs color negative.
>You can't use the same settings for scanning positive film, then negative
>film...
I should have been clearer. I meant a raw scan in which such things as
levels, curves, gammas, unsharp mask , etc. settings were the same (i.e.,
uncorrected and unadjusted). Obviously, there might be some reversa
Thank You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Anthony Atkielski
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 3:20 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Sharpness of color chrome vs color negative.
Laurie asks:
> That's nice; but pardon my ig
I have
yet to find anything that removes water spots once they have dried; there are
things which will reduce them - especially their obviousness - as you have
found. I have even tried rewashing the film.
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]O
Not to beat a dead horse or start an argument; but with respect to buying
film on location, I would certainly take into account the purposes of the
photography.
If it is just snap shots, then there may not be any reason not to buy film
on location as long as you get it from a respected and known
But not everybody uses the same quality controls or implements them in the
same way with regularity. Moreover, not everyone uses the same exact
chemistry or has the same quality of water. I know of two professional labs
in my community that use different brands of chemistry which results in
slig
They usually know what it is and, unless extraordinarily dumb, do not try
and unroll it. Remember that 120 and 120 like roll films have been around a
hellava lot longer than 35mm roll film in canisters; and they are likely to
be more common than you think in third world countries were old twin re
This is also true for Toronto when one flies into Toronto on an
international flight, including US flight, and switches to a domestic
Canadian flight or when one flies in on a US flight and switches to an
international flight to Asia, Europe, or elsewhere and/or visa versa. You
not only have to
>Most large cities have photo stores. Many of these have refrigerators
stocked
>with fresh film. All you have to do is buy from one that has film stored
in
>this way. It's unlikely they'd pay for refrigeration just to keep ruined
film
>cold.
It is obvious that you did not read my post closely;
Alas, nothing is foolproof. That a process is automated and even consistent
does not mean that the operators are equally competent in performing the
process, equally diligent in keeping temperatures consistent or regularly
changing chemistry on a consistent schedule, equally concerned with running
From
the quotes that have been included, I am not sure if you are responding to me or
to someone else. However, I will make a few counterpoints to your
comments.
First
of all, many of those high quality magazines published in the US which are
printed or distributed in Europe have bureau
Of course; it might get stolen or damaged. :-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Stephen
Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2001 11:35 AM
To: Film Scanner
Subject: filmscanners: X-ray and digital camera
Hello,
Now that film and x-ray has been
I think the likelihood of someone wanting to buy a web resolution image is
probably very low; but the likelihood of someone wanting to steal it (i.e.
use it for free) is probably much higher. Typically, those that do steal
web resolution images are those who either do not use images for their
liv
>The point here is not that the image is listed, but that the Google site
says that the images *might* be copyrighted,
>when it should say that they *are* copyrighted (or some such thing).
However, it just might be the case that the images on a given site are not
privately owned images but images
While I do not always agree with Anthony or his reasoning, I think that he
raises some good questions here that merely a yes answer while sufficient is
not very helpful. I for one am curious and would like further elaboration
on what sort of client would license or buy a thumbnail image or a web
>Virtually nothing is in the public domain, and I agree with those who
object to
>the phrasing of the search engine's warning. Saying that an image "might
be
>copyrighted" implies that copyright protection is the exception to the
rule,
>when in fact, essentially everything is copyrighted, unless
rate for commissioned work. I, for one, do not think it's in our
best interest to revert to the old
way of doing business, with lower fees.
Harvey Ferdschneider
partner, SKID Photography, NYC
LAURIE SOLOMON wrote:
> I think the likelihood of someone wanting to buy a web resolution im
>And it's not the 'thumbnails' that we worry about getting lifted, it's the
larger images on our website
Maybe you should not have larger images that are downloadable on your web
site; and if you do, they certainly should not be high resolution images.
Obviously, the search engine can only acquir
It was not Metallica alone; they had vast support from the recording
industry as well as some other artists and writers. However, if one does
not take things literally, Rob has a point since Metallica is a very
wealther band with significant influence and revenue generating capacity -
the group m
>I'm not so sure. My impression is that stealing images is the rule on the
Web,
rather than the exception.
This is a little ambiguous; what aren't you sure of? Are you uncertain that
is its mostly teenagers and laypersons who are stealing low resolution
thumbnail images; or are unsure that one
While I generally agree with you on several points in your response to
Harvey, I have to say that screen resolutions right now are way beyond 800 X
600. I am able to get screen resolutions as high as 1600 x 1200 using some
video cards and a little higher using other video cards.
However, all thi
First, your statement that only the current law is applicable may be true
where you live but where I live in the US it is not. Images created and
registered under the old copyright laws are governed by the older laws that
they were copyrighted under.
There are many images in the historic archive
While the res[ponse will not satisfy you, the answer is that the creator is
not selling the rights but only renting them; if the creator decided to sell
the rights then he would not be able to collect rent on each and every use
after the sale of the rights - the new owner would. It is sort of lik
>I was speaking of average resolutions, and not maximum resolutions
Average versus maximum for whom. For me, 1600 x 1200 is my maximum
resolution that I can get on a majority of my monitors with 1024 x 768 and
1152 x 864 being the average resolutions that I can get from among all the
possible av
Now that is one of your more stupid arguments. The equivalent for your
bricklayer as is the case for your mechanic would be to keep them on an
annual paid retainer or service contract so that they would be available to
furnish bricklaying services or mechanic services whatever they may be
through
>So why are the rules for artists different
That is the point they are not different. The creation is the embodiment of
the artists talent, skills, creative powers, knowledge, and services (or if
you will the carrier of the artists conception). It is the conception which
is an expression of tho
A recent issue of a Publisher Perfection catalog, which tends to be on the
high side regarding prices, listed it at, I believe, around $2900 plus.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Shough, Dean
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 1:28 PM
To: '
>Does the license allow me to do that? Usually OEM software bundled with
hardware
>doesn't allow that so I'm not sure in this case.
Usually all software (bundled or not) allow one to give away the software,
or in some cases even resell it, as long as certain conditions are met. The
main provision
Since in reality these are really very different operations, I fail to see
first how any comparison between the two is possible at all (apples and
oranges) and second what definition and criteria of "destructive" is being
used and with respect to what objective.
If one rescales without resampling
There
could be a number of reasons. First every time you open a file in
Photoshop, a duplicate working file is opened in memory; if there were no such
duplicate file one would not be able to have a "revert to" feature and maybe not
even a history pallet. All adjustments and changes are mad
Caere Omnipage is a page scanning application using OCR where in text is
rendered editable and uses on a PC the twain driver of one's scanning
software to scan in a page of text; its cousin, Omniform, is a page scanning
application for scanning in or designing forms which are capable of being
fil
Preben,
Since you seem to be knowledgeable about IDE RAID matters, I wish to make
use of your knowledge as a resource even if it is OT for this list. I
recently bought an ABIT motherboard with RAID. The manual is not very clear
as tot he difference between RAID 0 (striping) and what it does vers
al Message -----
From: "LAURIE SOLOMON" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2001 7:53 PM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Best solution for HD and images
> Preben,
> Since you seem to be knowledgeable about IDE RAID matters, I wish to make
>
and images
on 11/12/01 12:22 AM, LAURIE SOLOMON at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> To Preben:
>
> Thanks for your response and patience. The Abit board does permit JBOD;
but
> it does not provide RAID 5 as you have noted. When I asked about what
> appeared to be a contradiction between
>What was truly astonishing was the fact that
>the tiny 35mm transparency, though magnified an incredible 516 times,
>retained sharpness. A very impressive testimonial to the quality of Leica
>lenses and photographer Ernst Haas. The camera: Leicaflex SL with Summicron
>50mm lens".
Also quite poss
2/01 10:34 PM, LAURIE SOLOMON at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Actually, both must be set up on the same IDE channel as masters.
>
> How does one do that? I thought that you could only have one master
device
> per channel; and it was the one that was connected to the end of the
ribbon
&
> Fed-X apparently no longer guarantees x-ray free travel for film, either.
That maybe because Fed-X has an arrangement with the US Postal Service
whereby it carries all the USPS's airmail (which is virtually all the USPS
mail) from destination to destination; thus, they are obliged to impose the
>But they grumbled about how I should have a lead lined pouch.
Sort of funny in a way. I fail to see how a lead lined bag would help
matters since it would prevent the film from being x-rayed and would
necessitate a hand check anyway. How would that be any different that
putting the film in a b
While it indeed may be more sensible for the ISP to maintain a virus
checking operation on all messages coming into and going out of their ISP,
your ISP also, evidently, seems to work under the assumption that
redundancy insures that the message will get through and sends out multiple
copies of
I understanbd completely and was just pulling your leg.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mark Otway
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 3:46 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Filmscanners: OT: E-mail virus
>> While it inde
1 - 100 of 628 matches
Mail list logo
