Laurie Solomon wrote:
Am I reading non-existent sentences; or are the responders skimming over
the information in the original post and answering what they assume the
case is and what is being asked. While advice may be gratefully
accepted by Shunith, he did NOT ask how to convert the file
Michael...
Thanks for reply...
michael shaffer wrote:
1/ Should i keep the files as RGB or convert to grayscale?
Use Photoshop's channel mixer to create your grayscales.
So, basically, you suggest scanning in RGB and then converting to grayscale?
Why not leave it in RGB?
2/ What dpi/ppi
Andre...
Thanks for the reply... but
1/ She's in NY so westcoast is a bit inconvenient
2/ Have checked their prices... seems a bit steep... after all she needs to
send out a couple of hundred prints... and while quality is important, in
this case think it'd be a bit of overkill.
3/ Conventional
Laurie...
Thanks for the response sorry for my delay in replying... but i'm 5.5
hours ahead of GMT...
LAURIE SOLOMON wrote:
If she plans to reproduce the publicity photos in any sort of quantity for
distribution, she would definitiely need the file, since there is a
definite
loss in
Dear Bob...
Thanks for the response... sorry for the delay in my replying... time diff
and then the morning after the night before :)
Bob Shomler wrote:
1/ Should i keep the files as RGB or convert to grayscale?
Look at each channel R, B, G). In my experience they will be identical;
Bob,
Bob,
Thanks for the response... Sorry for the delay in replying... time
difference :)! +Sunday am after Sat night :0
bob geoghegan wrote:
1) I'd scan them right into greyscale. A BW scan with a Tri-X profile
(or
other silver BW film) will probably do more justice to the film's tones
than
Arthur Entlich wrote:
There is one part of Adobe Gamma, (and I don't recall which, as it has
Ok... that's correct... it's the White Point setting when you need to turn
off all ambient light
Cheers...
SD
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system
A recent thread has veered slightly towards stock photographs...
Just curious as to the present trend of stock photographers...
1/ Do they only give TPs to stock agencies?
2/ Do they retain the originals and give dupes to the agencies?
3/ Or do they, now, scan their own TPs and submit thefiles?
Anthony...
On the subject of high res images for web use PS's Save for Web feature
automatically scales an image to the 72 dpi (ok...ppi for the purists here!)
resolution
100 x 100 pixel @ 4000ppi = 0.06 x 0.06cm. Saved by Save for Web option the
file is now a 100 x 100 pixel @
Anthony Atkielski wrote:
An ordinary Save As does not change the DPI.
Correct...
Save for Web sounds like just another gadget to me--another
bloated feature that Adobe added in order to try to persuade people to pay
a
few hundred dollars for their umpteenth upgrade of a product that
- Original Message -
From: Anthony Atkielski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Conversion to 72 dpi doesn't do anything, so you can skip that.
Anthony,
Could you kindly elaborate on that? Also, in a subsequent mail you said:
If by resolution you mean DPI, you can forget about
that--DPI is
Alex..
You can always increase the font size on your desktop 1600x1200 gives
you a much larger area to play with... (increase font size by going to...
Settings - Advanced -General).
Cheers...
SD
- Original Message -
From: Alex Zabrovsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Quite right... anytime i find a site that disables right click... i usually
exit... forthwith.
By disabling right click you, as a website, are interfering with my right to
view the internet/site as i wish and as i find convenient. If you don't
respect my right, i'm not interested in your site.
Disabling right click will not stop any of the ones you mention from using
your pix if they so choose.
So, what's your point?
On the other hand, disbaling right click is an irritant... it stops me from
doing a whole lot of things easily... like, opening in new window... like
e-mailing the page
So, what does that have to do with the price of fish?
- Original Message -
From: Julie Cooke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 03, 2002 3:09 PM
Subject: [filmscanners] RE: Disabling right-click, etc. (was: Web home page
writing software)
I was advised to
Right on!
- Original Message -
From: Anthony Atkielski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 03, 2002 5:52 PM
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Disabling right-click, etc. (was: Web home page
writing software)
Shunith writes:
Disabling right click will not stop any
- Original Message -
From: Anthony Atkielski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 12:54 PM
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Web home page writing software
SD writes:
... notepad is the best... but is it worth
th hassle and the learning curve? Doubt it
Alex
When it comes to doing the html don't use FrontPage... it's really crap...
use Dreamweaver MX but that's several hundred dollars... there are a number
of free html editors out there which are pretty good one that comes to
mind is 1st Page 2000 by Evrsoft... you can download it at
James...
1/ I find the best thing to do in situations like this is to reformat the
hard drive and reinstall windows 2k with all the hardware in place. Then
start installing programs one by one. (Of course you need to back up your
data.) Do you have partitions? i find that by having partitions, i
- Original Message -
From: Shunith Dutt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 10:08 AM
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Win 2k? problems
snip
all day on drives other than C:... so reformatting is never a problem
Ooops... that 'day' should read 'data
No problem here either :)
SD
- Original Message -
From: Bruce M. Burnett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 30, 2002 8:48 AM
Subject: [filmscanners] RE: Black and white scans onLS4000EDandotherissues
Austin,
You assume that everyone with a Nikon scanner has
Peder wrote:
No, I really mean the raw file, not the (Vuescan-adjusted) scan
file.
But *I* dont't use that option - after all, Vuescan has special
knowledge about the input data (i.e. that it is data from a specific
Vuescan-controlled scanner); an image editor knows only that it is
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 8:39 PM
Subject: [filmscanners] RE: HP 5470C and 16 bit (NOT)
The 5470c scans at settings up to 16 bit, but the output from the resident
software, HP PrecisionScan Pro 3.1, is
only 8 bit
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 11:35 PM
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: HP 5470C and 16 bit (NOT)
Someone mentioned on comp.periphs.scanners sometime back
that (pretty sure it was this scanner) WILL output a 48bit file
Peder,
Thanks for the reply...
- Original Message -
From: Peder Skyt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 2:10 AM
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Need some tips on Vuescan
1/ The preview looks like hell bears no resemblance to the actual
pic
Set
Hi everyone...
Am just starting to scan BW... now, i realise there are some obvious
issues... ICE for instance... but what i'd like are a few basic tips that'll
save me having to reinvent the wheel :) (Am using a Nikon 4000ED)
1/ Realise that Nikon scans in RGB and then converts to
No problems here... had terrible luck with 3.1 and 3.1.1... version 3.1.2 is
fine... the problem with the earlier versions was my dual cpu... Nikon
couldn't handle it... yes, it was a Nikon Software problem... a solution was
to reboot in single cpu mode... which i refused to do... so used
Have an LS4000 ED... far more quiet than the Microtek ArrtixScan 4000T is
was using before... it does occasionally make grinding sounds... butas
mentioned less than the ArtixScan and often runs pretty silently... have no
other 35mm scanners to compare with...
SD
- Original Message -
Was scanning a friend's slides today... one of them had a lot of fungus on
it... the thought of touching it up was too much for me so, i thought i'd
give Digital Ice a try
Wow! It really rocks!!! All fungus gone... image nice and clean more
than sharp enough for our/his purpose. On
I don't think he ever said that this was a Yahoo Group. i gather it's
just a general warning and a solution:)
- Original Message -
From: Laurie Solomon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 31, 2002 2:20 AM
Subject: [filmscanners] RE: Yahoo Automatic Spam
Yup... the Nikon 3.1 used to stink...
However, the latest version 3.12 is pretty ok have been using it quite a
bit of recent and must admit... no problems... of course, i don't try to do
too many scans at one time... but then my work methods are such that any way
i usually take one frame...
There was reference by someone here... ages ago... with regard to cleaning a
Nikon 4000ED. I posted a question as to how it was done and never got a
reply... so, just in case someone here knows the feasibility of cleaning
that particular scanner... would appreciate a feedback (it's a major
Major A...
Grateful if you could copy that to me...
TIA...
SD
- Original Message -
From: Major A [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 02, 2002 10:46 PM
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Cleaning LS2000 optic?
There was reference by someone here... ages ago...
Or is this the post you were talking about?
Cheers...
SD
- Original Message -
From: Major A [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 02, 2002 10:43 PM
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Cleaning LS2000 optic?
I am passing my LS2000 on to my daughter but i want it to be
Yes... chamois is excellent... you just have to be careful that it's clean..
wash... and rinse really thoroughly and then work it till it's soft again.
The other option is well washed/used pure cotton like an old 100% cotton
handkerchief
:)
SD
- Original Message -
From: Arthur
a camera's which does scratch easily with
this in mine
what ever you clean it with should be soft. camera lens tissues is what I've
used without
scratches.
Thats all the service agents do
rob
Shunith Dutt wrote:
There was reference by someone here... ages ago... with regard to cleaning
a
Nikon
Thanks it doesn't seem to difficult :) Just hope the 4000 is as easy as
the 2000!
Regards...
SD
- Original Message -
From: michael shaffer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 03, 2002 4:07 AM
Subject: [filmscanners] RE: Cleaning LS2000 optic?
Shunith writes
Hear! Hear!
It's a shame that just too many people are a__l minded
- Original Message -
From: Arthur Entlich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 9:47 PM
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: PMA 2002 - Orlando
Norman Unsworth wrote:
Give us a
- Original Message -
From: Enoch's Vision, Inc. (Cary Enoch R...) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 5:20 PM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Nikon Scan V3.1.2 For Windows and MAC
snip
It's there. Honest it is:
Enoch
Thanks for the feedback...
Cheers...
SD
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.307 / Virus Database: 168 - Release Date: 11/12/2001
- Original Message -
From: Enoch's Vision, Inc. (Cary Enoch R...) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 7:23 AM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Nikon Scan V3.1.2 For Windows and MAC
environments. Having worked at Microsoft for six years I know enough to
- Original Message -
From: James Grove [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 2:38 AM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Nikon Scan V3.1.2 For Windows and MAC IMPORTANT
You should always uninstall the Windows versions and also run the
regsweep utilitity in
James Grove wrote to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:09 PM
Subject: filmscanners: Nikon Scan V3.1.2 For Windows and MAC
Hi Folks,
At last Nikon Scan V3.1.2 With XP Compatibility also for the MAC
Where on earth did you find it? in the UK section 3.1.1 is still
James/Enoch
You know, i must have spent an hour hunting for it on the Nikon sites...
going in thru www.nikon.com and then following links... on the us site (it's
a black and white effect) couldn't even find a link to support... on the uk
site it was still 3.1.1... they're really strange
How d'you clean the scanner? Any ideas how i'd go about cleaning the LS4000?
I mean, is it easy or does it have to go to a service centre?
Thanks...
SD
- Original Message -
From: Op's [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 5:24 PM
Subject: Re:
Mikael Risedal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Polaroid SS4000 / 4000+ and others
All non flat film have a problem in Nikon scanners despite if you are
using
manual film holder or the motor unit.. I prefer the manual film holder. (
quick and easy and keep the film
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 23, 2001 3:58 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: VueScan cropping
You sometimes need to adjust the Device|Frame offset option with
the LS-40 and LS-4000, especially if there's a bit of film leader.
- Original Message -
From: Mark Otway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 10:07 PM
Subject: filmscanners: Nikonscan 3.1.1 update
snip
James Grove's site was faster (thanks James) but still no resume, so I
got a mate with a 'fat pipe' to download it
- Original Message -
From: Maris V. Lidaka, Sr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2001 6:01 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Question about Vuescan
It's not auto-detect, but it has 16 (more than a few) Kodak film types,
and each film type has settings
- Original Message -
From: Neil Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 3:37 AM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Nikon film flatness (was Glass slide mounts)
and you thought this thread had died.. G
Well, someone asked if the AN coatings of Glass
- Original Message -
From: Svante Kleist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 12:41 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Nikon film flatness (was Glass slide mounts)
Supposedly, Nikon Scan 3.1.1 is round the corner.
I can't imagine that Nikon would
On the subject
Would an anti-Newton Rings mount affect the quality of the scan?
Shunith
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.282 / Virus Database: 150 - Release Date: 25/09/2001
52 matches
Mail list logo
