Mike Kersenbrock wrote:
> Op's wrote:
>
> > David
> >
> > Since you asked I have now gone to XP and can't get my 8K printer to work with it.
> Raster
> > plus 2.0.6b. Is there a patch?
> > Can't find one.
>
> I've a lowly CI-5000s printer, and installed that program into XP. I haven't trie
bject:[filmscanners] Re: OT: Film Recorders
David
Since you asked I have now gone to XP and can't get my 8K printer to work
with it. Raster
plus 2.0.6b. Is there a patch?
Can't find one.
I now have it connected to my old P350 PC under ME but want to have it
running on my current
PC with XP
9, 2001 11:12 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:[filmscanners] Re: OT: Film Recorders
>
> >If you are on a budget, and willing to experiment, and suffer the quality
> >consequenses, you can photograph your screen.
>
> I have recently seen a slide show where scanned
There is a big difference between screen resolution of 1200x 800 and having a
4000x2700
pixel slide from a 4k film printer (or 8200x5500 pixels off an 8k one). The earlier
Film
printers were not much with there small tubes (The current Polaroids have 7" tubes)
Compared to the screen the film
>If you are on a budget, and willing to experiment, and suffer the quality
>consequenses, you can photograph your screen.
I have recently seen a slide show where scanned slides were digitally
manipulated, then photographed from screen. I don't know what the screen
resolution was.
When only re-ph
