At 08:37 PM 9/1/2002 -0700, Bruce wrote:
>Please, enough already with the dynamic range argument. I want to learn
>about scanners.
>
>Thanks.
>-bruce
Bruce,
You've made a common mistake.
Once upon a time, scanners were the focus of this list.
However, it has now become the domain for the all
im
sted. Maybe they would then take their bitching somewhere else and then
>leave the list for those of us who want to learn and
further the discussion about scanning.
> From: "JimD" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2002/09/03 Tue AM 08:18:39 GMT+12:00
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
scribers who only want to talk about what is
important to them.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 02, 2002 8:39 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: dynamic range discussion
> If I K
I agree. This _is_ the place to discuss dynamic range with respect to film
scanners. I don't think anyone can reasonably complain about it, as long as
it's labeled as such in the subject line. It's no harder to hit Delete on
something that says Dynamic Range in the subject than it is to hit Delete
;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: 2002/09/03 Tue AM 08:18:39 GMT+12:00
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: [filmscanners] Re: dynamic range discussion
> >
> > At 08:37 PM 9/1/2002 -0700, Bruce wrote:
> > >Please, enough already with the dynamic range argum
Hi Paul-
An unfortunate analogy, perhaps. Whereas I "only" get to delete 1 or 2
Viagra ads a day, this list, like others before it, has recently been taken
over by an endless stream of going-no-where tit-for-tat back-and-forth,
involving only a few list members. As in all of the similar diatrib
Bill,
> An unfortunate analogy, perhaps. Whereas I "only" get to delete 1 or 2
> Viagra ads a day, this list, like others before it, has recently
> been taken
> over by an endless stream of going-no-where tit-for-tat back-and-forth,
> involving only a few list members. As in all of the similar
PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Austin Franklin
Sent: Monday, September 02, 2002 11:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] RE: dynamic range discussion
Bill,
> An unfortunate analogy, perhaps. Whereas I "only" get to delete 1 or 2
> Viagra ads a day, this list, like others
You are right it is not hard to delete or skip. I skip most messages on
lists, and only choose to read the ones with subjects that interest me.
There is very little overhead in doing this and I don't really understand
why people get so upset about it. The funny thing is that the people who
do obj