From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Anthony Atkielski
Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2002 11:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Re:GRAIN/ICE SHOWDOWN: Nikon
LS8000vs.MinoltaScanMulti Pro!
Alex writes:
> I was wondering why people continue to
> c
EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Anthony Atkielski
Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2002 11:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Re:GRAIN/ICE SHOWDOWN: Nikon
LS8000vs.MinoltaScanMulti Pro!
Alex writes:
> I was wondering why people continue to
> complain heavily about Nikon Scan
eScan.
With 3.1.2 the problem has been rectified. And, touch wood, NikonScan...
just hums along... BTW am using W2K Pro.
SD
- Original Message -
From: "Anthony Atkielski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2002 3:27 AM
Subject: [fil
ing to do helping me out to understand usage of UI of Nikon Scan).
Regards,
Alex Z
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Bradbury
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 6:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Re:GRAIN
- Original Message -
From: "Anthony Atkielski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 2:26 PM
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Re:GRAIN/ICE SHOWDOWN: Nikon
LS8000vs.MinoltaScanMulti Pro!
3.1.2 doesn't sound like a first revision t
Mark writes:
> Vuescan also has a fairly poor interface ...
True, but I believe that's because Ed spends his time getting the product to
do what it is supposed to do, and getting it to do it well. Therefore, like
you, I'm willing to overlook the less-than-perfect interface. It does
conform to
Norm writes:
> The Nikon 3.1 is about as inept a piece of
> software as I have ever used. Non intuitive
> system with windows and controls scattered
> about without any apparent logic.
As far as I can tell, Nikon Scan was designed and written by high-school
students. Nobody else would be inexpe
