[filmscanners] RE: dynamic range discussion

2002-09-03 Thread Laurie Solomon
]]On Behalf Of Austin Franklin Sent: Monday, September 02, 2002 11:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [filmscanners] RE: dynamic range discussion Bill, An unfortunate analogy, perhaps. Whereas I only get to delete 1 or 2 Viagra ads a day, this list, like others before it, has recently been taken

[filmscanners] Re: dynamic range discussion

2002-09-03 Thread Julian Robinson
You are right it is not hard to delete or skip. I skip most messages on lists, and only choose to read the ones with subjects that interest me. There is very little overhead in doing this and I don't really understand why people get so upset about it. The funny thing is that the people who do

[filmscanners] Re: dynamic range discussion

2002-09-02 Thread JimD
At 08:37 PM 9/1/2002 -0700, Bruce wrote: Please, enough already with the dynamic range argument. I want to learn about scanners. Thanks. -bruce Bruce, You've made a common mistake. Once upon a time, scanners were the focus of this list. However, it has now become the domain for the all

[filmscanners] Re: dynamic range discussion

2002-09-02 Thread
their bitching somewhere else and then leave the list for those of us who want to learn and further the discussion about scanning. From: JimD [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2002/09/03 Tue AM 08:18:39 GMT+12:00 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [filmscanners] Re: dynamic range discussion At 08:37 PM 9/1

[filmscanners] RE: dynamic range discussion

2002-09-02 Thread Laurie Solomon
what is important to them. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 02, 2002 8:39 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [filmscanners] Re: dynamic range discussion If I Knew anything about running a list I'd

[filmscanners] RE: dynamic range discussion

2002-09-02 Thread Paul D. DeRocco
I agree. This _is_ the place to discuss dynamic range with respect to film scanners. I don't think anyone can reasonably complain about it, as long as it's labeled as such in the subject line. It's no harder to hit Delete on something that says Dynamic Range in the subject than it is to hit

[filmscanners] RE: dynamic range discussion

2002-09-02 Thread Austin Franklin
] Subject: [filmscanners] Re: dynamic range discussion At 08:37 PM 9/1/2002 -0700, Bruce wrote: Please, enough already with the dynamic range argument. I want to learn about scanners. Thanks. -bruce Bruce, You've made a common mistake. Once upon a time, scanners were

[filmscanners] Re: dynamic range discussion

2002-09-02 Thread Bill Morse
Hi Paul- An unfortunate analogy, perhaps. Whereas I only get to delete 1 or 2 Viagra ads a day, this list, like others before it, has recently been taken over by an endless stream of going-no-where tit-for-tat back-and-forth, involving only a few list members. As in all of the similar diatribe

[filmscanners] RE: dynamic range discussion

2002-09-02 Thread Austin Franklin
Bill, An unfortunate analogy, perhaps. Whereas I only get to delete 1 or 2 Viagra ads a day, this list, like others before it, has recently been taken over by an endless stream of going-no-where tit-for-tat back-and-forth, involving only a few list members. As in all of the similar