Re: Epson printing was Re: filmscanners: 4000 dpi question

2000-11-09 Thread Meino de Graaf
Austin Franklin wrote: As I said above, regardless of what causes the effect, my prints have less artifacts if the output resolution from the software is 240dpi. Previously I had been using 300dpi but switched after I discovered the reduction in artifacts. Understood, and agree,

RE: Epson printing was Re: filmscanners: 4000 dpi question

2000-11-09 Thread Laurie Solomon
- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Arthur Entlich Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2000 6:08 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Epson printing was Re: filmscanners: 4000 dpi question Austin Franklin wrote: Do you know the algorithm Epson uses, when they call

RE: Epson printing was Re: filmscanners: 4000 dpi question

2000-11-08 Thread Laurie Solomon
f Of Frank Paris Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2000 9:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Epson printing was Re: filmscanners: 4000 dpi question Is stochastic dithering what Foley and van Dam call "random dithering"? They don't explain it (in "Computer Graphics") but I ca

RE: Epson printing was Re: filmscanners: 4000 dpi question

2000-11-08 Thread Frank Paris
Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Laurie Solomon Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2000 11:49 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Epson printing was Re: filmscanners: 4000 dpi question Could be Frank; but I do not know for sure. I am not familiar

RE: Epson printing was Re: filmscanners: 4000 dpi question

2000-11-08 Thread Austin Franklin
Do you know the algorithm Epson uses, when they call it 'error diffusion'? -- From: Frank Paris Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2000 10:33 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:RE: Epson printing was Re: filmscanners: 4000 dpi question But error diffusion is not a random

RE: Epson printing was Re: filmscanners: 4000 dpi question

2000-11-08 Thread Laurie Solomon
inal Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Frank Paris Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2000 9:33 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Epson printing was Re: filmscanners: 4000 dpi question But error diffusion is not a random process. Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ju

RE: Epson printing was Re: filmscanners: 4000 dpi question

2000-11-08 Thread Tony Sleep
Do you know the algorithm Epson uses, when they call it 'error diffusion'? It's a patented form of stochastic dithering. Which is what I do when confronted with large phone bills. Regards Tony Sleep http://www.halftone.co.uk - Online portfolio exhibit; + film scanner info comparisons

RE: Epson printing was Re: filmscanners: 4000 dpi question

2000-11-08 Thread Frank Paris
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Laurie Solomon Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2000 10:52 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Epson printing was Re: filmscanners: 4000 dpi question Hell, for all I know, Epson may be just using

RE: Epson printing was Re: filmscanners: 4000 dpi question

2000-11-07 Thread Laurie Solomon
. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Austin Franklin Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2000 5:56 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Epson printing was Re: filmscanners: 4000 dpi question Why would you expect any DPI to be 'best'? I am not saying

RE: Epson printing was Re: filmscanners: 4000 dpi question

2000-11-07 Thread Frank Paris
(13 years) Snowflake, male cockatiel (12 years) http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Austin Franklin Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2000 6:26 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Epson printing