Re: Nikon Apparent Grain (was Re: Nikon LS-30/Vuescanquestions)

2000-09-22 Thread Roman Kielich®
At 11:24 21/09/2000 +1000, you wrote: >Murphy, Bob H <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Why won't a piece of white paper under exposed by 2-1/3rd stops produce >the > > same exposure as an 18% gray card? > >Because a grey card photographed with a 28mm lens at 2 metres won't be full >frame? The main t

RE: Nikon Apparent Grain (was Re: Nikon LS-30/Vuescanquestions)

2000-09-22 Thread Murphy, Bob H
Message- > From: Roman Kielich® [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2000 6:55 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Nikon Apparent Grain (was Re: Nikon > LS-30/Vuescanquestions) > > At 11:24 21/09/2000 +1000, you wrote: > >Murphy, Bob H &

Re: Nikon Apparent Grain (was Re: Nikon LS-30/Vuescanquestions)

2000-09-22 Thread Rob Geraghty
Roman Kielich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > All modern films have a multilayer construction, each R, G, B - sensitive > layer consists of 2 or 3 layers of different speed (grain size). The bigger > the grain, the bigger the speed. If you underexpose a film, you record an > image in more sensitive l

Re: Nikon Apparent Grain (was Re: Nikon LS-30/Vuescanquestions)

2000-09-22 Thread Rob Geraghty
Murphy, Bob H <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Another option (that would yield the same exposure) is to > use a spot meter on the white paper and expose normally. > This will yield the same number of photons reaching the > film as spot metering on a gray card. As it happens, I already used spot mete