I was equally curious, but the RFS 3600 is already a month past due. I've
been waiting too long for it. I ordered the Polaroid SS4000 yesterday,
chomping at the bit. If the Kodak lives up to promise, it sounds like a very
convenient scanner. I especially like the ability load in a whole role of
un
> Is it out yet? I read about it in kodak homepage.
> Does anyone know anything more about this scanner? It
> seems like a great scanner for its price.
All I can tell you is what I've been told secondhand. It's a Kodak-badged
design from Pacific Image, allegedly, and although it can scan an
Saw it for sale on pcconnection.com for $1299. Looks goo to me...
Spencer Stone
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Frank Paris
Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2000 6:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: How is the Kodak new RFS 3600
Behalf Of Sumtingwong
> Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2000 6:33 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: How is the Kodak new RFS 3600 Scanner?
>
>
> Saw it for sale on pcconnection.com for $1299. Looks goo to me...
>
> Spencer Stone
>
> -Original Message---
Good, that is.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Sumtingwong
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2000 3:33 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: How is the Kodak new RFS 3600 Scanner?
Saw it for sale on pcconnection.com for $1299. Looks goo to
> What about the "input" side for the uncut roll. Do you think one could
> bypass the input spool and feed in a 100-foot roll from a bulk loader
> next to he scanner?
Sorry, I know no more than I posted and what appears on Kodak's website.
Regards
Tony Sleep
http://www.halftone.co.uk - Online
>What about the "input" side for the uncut roll. Do you think one could
>bypass the input spool and feed in a 100-foot roll from a bulk loader
>next to he scanner?
I would guess not, at least not with the Kodak scan software I saw at
Seybold last August. It allowed one to select individual, mu
