> > >Are there any people in here who actually shoot, or better still, sell,
> > >photographs ?
> >
> >
>
>
> I do
>
> Lawrence
>
> http://www.lwsphoto.co
Me too. My main interest in scanning is so I can shoot colour neg in horrible
light conditions which would be very bad news with tr
> When I joined this list, I thought that it was for the purpose of discussing
> scanners, in order to get the best possible end result, THE IMAGE.
Yes. Please folks, although the occasional diversion is fine, can everyone try
sitting on their hands when tempted to reply to OT threads - or mai
I do all of that tooand print the results on my printer. Each of these area
of producing scanned images and things pretty directly related to them seem to
be good topices for this group.
Gordon
Austin Franklin wrote:
> > >Are there any people in here who actually shoot, or better still, sell,
> >Are there any people in here who actually shoot, or better still, sell,
> >photographs ?
> I do
Me too...and I even shoot with film and scan the film with a scanner ;-)
> >Are there any people in here who actually shoot, or better still, sell,
> >photographs ?
>
>
I do
Lawrence
http://www.lwsphoto.com
Okay, you're all very smart. Anyone know anything about filmscanners?
You do remember filmscanners, don't you?
; -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Hersch Nitikman
> Sent: Friday, November 17, 2000 7:58 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: filmscanners: RE:scientific method
>
>
> Since this is really off topic, I hesitate to
Since this is really off topic, I hesitate to join in for the engineers.
However, I can't resist, for a couple of reasons.
The lay people who run our political system seem to have an idea that the
Scientists are a higher breed than the engineers, so when an engineering
calamity strikes (e.g., C
Hallelujah!!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bill Ross
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2000 11:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: RE:scientific method
In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, "Let there be
At 07:48 PM 11/17/00 +, you wrote:
Don't let first impressions scare you away!
This is the first OT thread I have seen this far OT, and usually the group
sticks to scanners and related topics very well.
There are a lot of knowledgeable folk here, hang in there.
>HELP,
>When I joined this
> By the way, I'm studying architecture now, an arts subject, too. Or would
you consider it to be an engineering > science?. Well might depend upon the
school, I guess here at the technical university in Munich it's taught as
an art - > strange isn't it.
Engineering and science are two differe
In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, "Let there be Light."
And there was still nothing. But, you could see it.
> > And mathematicians are not scientists?!?!?!?!?!?!
> >
> > No, they are not. Some may happen to be both, but being a
> > mathematician does not make you a scientist,
> > ... They are entirely different disciplines and fields.
Right.
I've been studying math for about four terms and I would c
ay, November 17, 2000 7:29 PM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: RE:scientific method
> shAf,
>
> If you want to be technical and really push it; you have to go back to the
> ancient Greeks and their use of the term "science" in their wirtings which
> typically means any compre
shAf,
If you want to be technical and really push it; you have to go back to the
ancient Greeks and their use of the term "science" in their wirtings which
typically means any comprehensive systematic study of a subject (or
figuratively stated, any systematic ongoing discussion of a subject or
fi
15 matches
Mail list logo
