: Saturday, December 22, 2001 9:26 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:[filmscanners] Re: filmscanners: SS4000 Rebate UPC
Nope, sent mine in about the same time.
John in OKC
- Original Message -
From: Andy Darlow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 22
I'm still waiting.
Sent in the paperwork in the first week of Sept.
Salutations, David Lewiston
- Original Message -
From: Andy Darlow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 9:19 PM
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: filmscanners: SS4000 Rebate UPC
Hello
Still waiting here too.
Tom
- Original Message -
From: Andy Darlow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2001 1:19 AM
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: filmscanners: SS4000 Rebate UPC
Hello:
Has anyone recieved their $200 rebate from SS4000 purchases?
Mine
Nope, sent mine in about the same time.
John in OKC
- Original Message -
From: Andy Darlow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2001 1:19 AM
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: filmscanners: SS4000 Rebate UPC
Hello:
Has anyone recieved their $200 rebate from
issuing the
rebate.
David
-Original Message-
From: JackG [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2001 9:26 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:[filmscanners] Re: filmscanners: SS4000 Rebate UPC
Nope, sent mine in about the same time.
John in OKC
Ah, the dreaded dirty scanner problem.
Happened to me too. Call Polaroid and ask for the free cleaning kit.
They'll send you a little brush gadget that attaches to your slide carrier.
Follow the instructions. For 'most' people, that fixes the problem.
For me, it didn't, and I had to send it in
If the carrier seemed to be constantly seeking you may have dirt in the
sensor. There is a brush assembly that you can request, free, from Polaroid
support.
David
-Original Message-
From: Stewart Musket [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 1:51 PM
To:
Tom wrote:
Happened to me too. Call Polaroid and ask for the free cleaning kit.
They'll send you a little brush gadget that attaches to your slide carrier.
Follow the instructions. For 'most' people, that fixes the problem.
If the brush doesn't work, you can also try blowing the dust out of the
David wrote:
If the carrier seemed to be constantly seeking you may have dirt in the
sensor. There is a brush assembly that you can request, free, from Polaroid
support.
David, maybe this is a dumb suggestion but why not add the brush to the
standard kit for the scanner?
Rob
Rob Geraghty
At 12:16 PM 11/12/01, Hemingway, David J wrote:
If the carrier seemed to be constantly seeking you may have dirt in the
sensor. There is a brush assembly that you can request, free, from Polaroid
support.
David
This brings up something I have wondered about since I recently got my
SS120.
It has been included for a few months.
David
-Original Message-
From: Rob Geraghty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 5:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: SS4000 Problem
David wrote:
If the carrier seemed
No special cleaning. The 120 sensor should not have the same problem, I am
told.
David
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Spirer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 6:11 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject:RE: filmscanners: SS4000 Problem
At 12:16 PM
You can still (and should) tag the image with the monitor profile
after all
it is the profile being used when you edit the image. Once the image opens
in Photoshop you simply allow conversion to your preferred colour space.
This is the method suggested by Polaroid in their web based help
They formerly did, but no more.
David
-Original Message-
From: Gerry Kaslowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 3:39 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: filmscanners: SS4000 SCSI question.
I thought theat they all came with a card. Mine did
I'm using the 4000 for the first time since an initial test to
make
sure it worked properly. I've been trying Insight, Vuescan and
Silverfast 5.1 ai on a Win 98 box. So far all my scans are color
negs.
You should try Version 5.5 if scanning negatives. It is a LOT
better. You
can
Dave,
Am I correct the primary improvement is the addition of film terms?
They provided a large number of profiles as part of the package, but the
primary benefit would be the significantly improved negative scanning tools.
they are much easier to sue and allow a greater degree of fine tuning
James,
Go for an adapter. Buying them locally is best so nothing gets
confused (male/female, type of connector, etc) and you can return it if
things still don't come out right. Are you sure it's 60 pins? High
density 50 pin is common. I'd go from the SCSI card to the SS4000 then to
the
Having used SCSI for many years, I can tell you that there have been
many different plugs and cables designed along the way. I have a good
number of adapters and cables and pick them up whenever they are on
special locally (usually in the specials bin because that store is no
longer supporting
If you want to scan color negatives, you really need to upgrade Silverfast to 5.5 as its NegaFix film profile feature is a big improvement. Silverfast will output high-bit (48-bit) files, but it's a raw output. You have to do all processing on that file with Silverfast HDR, Photoshop, or something
The coupon is at Polaroid:
http://www.polaroidwork.com/media/demosanddownloadables/downloadablefiles/pd
f/us_en_coupon_ss4000_rebate_1231_1f91c.pdf
That's going to wrap, so cut and paste it.
Tom
The coupon at Ecost.com and pcmall seems like it is generic. Can I buy it
from, say
Andrew,
The scanner works fine on ME. I use it on ME myself frequently.
Most any inexpensive SCSI card that runs on ME will do. I would expect you
would not have to pay more than $60.
David
-Original Message-
From: Andrew G. Martelon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday,
Thanks David, I can hardly wait to fire my scanner up.
Hemingway, David J wrote:
Andrew,
The scanner works fine on ME. I use it on ME myself frequently.
Most any inexpensive SCSI card that runs on ME will do. I would expect you
would not have to pay more than $60.
David
One size fits all
-Original Message-
From: James Hill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2001 12:01 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: filmscanners: SS4000 comments
Thanks for the info Wire.
I have a question about the different platforms
- The SS4000 SCSI connectors are two different types: one DB-25 and one
Centronics (and odd combination).
The DB25 is a Mac standard for external SCSI connections...and the
Centronics type is a typical SCSI I connection. Not really odd, but
definitely old technology.
holder seems OK, but the film holder is
awkward and flimsy enough that I ordered a spare.
Mike
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of James Hill
Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2001 11:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: SS4000
Mike,
They are flimsy, but seem tougher than you think. Mine have never broken.
You do want a second one, though -- in fact, I'd recommend it to everyone
with a SS4000. That way you can be scanning one strip while loading the
other. Really speeds up scanning.
Tom
From: Mike Stephens
They
Wire Moore wrote:
Just got a SS4000 to replace an LS-2000. After a day of use I find the
SS4000 is not as convenient as the LS-2000, but the scans are first rate! A
significant improvement over the LS-2000. Here are some observations:
That was a great review and very valuable. Thanks
Wire wrote an excellent comparison of the SS4000 and LS-2000. Objective and unbiased. The SS4000 is indeed a fine scanner.
A week or so ago someone asked if they should order any extra film carriers for the SS4000. I responded that I didn't think it was necessary. I said that one of the plastic
It comes with one slide and one film strip holder. 4 slides at a time, 6
negs at a time.
Make sure you buy a second one (of whichever one you use). Makes it much
more useful. You can load one and scan one.
Heck of a deal -- I paid $1400 about 16 months ago. I just bought a Nikon
LS-4000, only
You ordinarily get two strips--one for slides and one for a strip of
negatives. You should not have to order and pay for these separately.
Without them you film scanner is simply not able to do anything at all.
---
Gregory Georges
Really Useful Content, Inc.
Chapel Hill, North Carolina
Andrzej wrote:
Hi I'm using Polaroid SS4000.
My scanner doesn't work, I hear running motor all the time, like on booting
stage and nothing happens. Computer didn't see SCSI unit. What to do? Is
there any hard reset button inside? Please help if you can. Thanks in
advance.
Exactly the same thing
In my case, neither worked, and it had to go back to Polaroid for the CCD to
be replaced. Thankfully, under warranty.
Keep the dust out!
Tom
Andrzej wrote:
Hi I'm using Polaroid SS4000.
My scanner doesn't work, I hear running motor all the time, like on
booting
stage and nothing happens.
Rob Geraghty [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote on Fri, 24 Aug 2001 11:01:16 +1000
The scanner still cycles
continuously. Since it's three months out of warranty I'm going to try
opening the case and using a normal brush on the sensor.
A year ago - before the brush was invented
I had the same
David Gordon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, although the brush does work - I have seen it fix my problem on a
friends machine, you may have more serious trouble.
Good luck opening the box but I think you may be sending it to Polaroid.
Maybe, but it's worth at least giving cleaning a try before
I wrote:
Is the brush available in the land of Oz?
I just answered my own question; Polaroid in Sydney are send me a brush.
I hope it comes with instructions or at leas a diagram of where the sensor
is located! :)
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
Rob Geraghty [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote on Thu, 16 Aug 2001 12:47:22 +1000
The scanner is cycling continuously as though
it is trying to initialise but can't.
The brush will fix your problem - I 've seen it with my own eyes! Call
Polaroid for one or ask someone here who might be close to
Rob Geraghty [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote on Thu, 16 Aug 2001 14:47:29 +1000
Polaroid in Sydney are send me a brush.
I hope it comes with instructions or at leas a diagram of where the sensor
is located! :)
The brush fits onto the 35mm slide carrier which you then run through the
scanner and out
David wrote:
It sounds like the dirty sensor. Call and get the brush.
Thanks for writing back, David! What's probably not obvious from my email
address is that I'm in Australia. Is the brush available in the land of
Oz?
Rob
PS I couldn't find any mention of the sensor or brush on the
Have you tried using a different Firewire port on the computer and
scanner?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Steven N. Norvich) wrote:
The SS4000 is, as far as I know, ONLY Firewire. The firewire
controller does
show up on device manager and is deemed running normally and there is
a 75 gig disk
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tony Sleep
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2001 4:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: SS4000, Win2K disappears!
On Wed, 25 Jul 2001 15:03:21 -0500 Steven N. Norvich
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Anyone have their scanner simply disappear
: filmscanners: SS4000, Win98 and VCache settings
Thanks. Good ideas here. Stan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Steve Greenbank
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2001 10:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: SS4000, Win98 and VCache
I have recieved no reports of stability problems or in fact any other
problems with Insight 5.0.
Regards
David
-Original Message-
From: Steve Greenbank [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2001 4:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: SS4000, Win98
On Tue, 24 Jul 2001 20:33:26 -0500 Stan Schwartz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I presume you are not having any freeze-ups. Have you used Insight 5.0?
None. I have only used the 5.0beta so far.
BTW, it appears to be more or less mandatory to completely uninstall
Insight before installing a
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Steve Greenbank
Sent: 24 July 2001 04:24
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: SS4000, Win98 and VCache settings
Changing the VCache settings should not alter the result, only
the speed at
which you
On Mon, 23 Jul 2001 16:06:20 -0500 Stan Schwartz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
[vcache]
MaxFileCache=16384
MinFileCache=3144
The settings I had been using were min=0, max=131,000 (that was
approximate--it was a correct multiple) with chunk size specified as
4096.
Now I can finish a
. They were originally trying to see
whether a P4 or athlon was best for Photoshop.
http://www.xbitlabs.com/cpu/photoshop-platform/
Eddie
- Original Message -
From: Jawed Ashraf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 8:46 PM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: SS4000
I presume you are not having any freeze-ups. Have you used Insight 5.0?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tony Sleep
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 10:55 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: SS4000, Win98 and VCache settings
Thanks. Good ideas here. Stan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Steve Greenbank
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2001 10:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: SS4000, Win98 and VCache settings
Changing the VCache settings should
I don't know that vcache has anything to do with the SCSI connection but
then with Windows it might. It does have to do with memory error messages
with RAM of over 512MB (not your situation) and a starting point for your
answer might be at
Changing the VCache settings should not alter the result, only the speed at
which you receive the result :- )Except where you hit the Win9x/ME bug where
you must set a value less than 512MB if you have more physical memory than
512MB.
As this does not apply to you it suggests you have a problem
On Tue, 19 Jun 2001 04:57:42 -0400 rafeb ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Personally, I see little reason to calibrate any scanner.
I rather agree. IME sample variation is usually slight with the better
units which use profiles, so any gain from doing this is likely to be
small. And DIY profiles
Good grief!
Now I'm really glad I got the 60 month extended warrenty on my Nikon.
Sounds like $100 well spent now, I wondered before.
Edwin
- Original Message -
From: "Bill Ross" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 2:29 PM
Subject: filmscanners:
in their corner so far. If I get your deal that might change.
Lloyd
- Original Message -
From: "Edwin Eleazer" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 1:48 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: ss4000 repair bill
Good grief!
Now I'm really glad I got th
. If
you need any more info e-mail me back and I'll look up the contract.
Edwin
- Original Message -
From: "Lloyd O'Daniel" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 5:40 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: ss4000 repair bill
From whom did you get this w
.
We do not offer an extended warranty. Some dealers may.
Thank you for contacting Nikon, Inc.
Sincerely,
Cal
Digital Imaging
Nikon, Inc.
- Original Message -
From: Lloyd O'Daniel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 2:40 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners
:)
-Original Message-
From: Tom Scales [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2001 9:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:filmscanners: SS4000 update
I have to praise Polaroid customer support. As most of you know, I'm having
a problem with my SS4000 and
The dust mote strikes again
You could call this situation "the looping cycle"
this happens because there is a dust particle sitting on the
'registration' sensor, the one which sets the carrier into the 'start'
position...
since it is blinded by the dust spek, it keeps the carrier moving back
Tom Scales wrote:
My SS4000 has developed a problem where the yellow light just continues to
flash and the motor runs on and on. I called Polaroid and they sent me a
'cleaning kit', really just a little brush that attaches to the slide
carrier.
Whoopee.
Didn't do a thing.
Well, in
Yes, followed every one of their instructions. More than once. I
understand the problem, but it does seem like a poor design.
Tom
Tom Scales wrote:
My SS4000 has developed a problem where the yellow light just continues
to
flash and the motor runs on and on. I called Polaroid and they
Been there, tried that g. First thing I tried, as I had heard that
advice, but I'll try it again.
Thanks,
Tom
The dust mote strikes again
You could call this situation "the looping cycle"
this happens because there is a dust particle sitting on the
'registration' sensor, the one which
Thanks for the advice on handling Polaroid. I always try to be nice and
respectful. I think that gets the best service. I'm not really willing to
spend $250 a year to keep their product working, since I'm just a hobbyist.
If that is really a requirement, maybe it's time to try the Nikon g.
Tom
And they said a perpetual motion machine could not be constructed . . .
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "heriltd" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 06, 2001 3:34 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: SS4000 problems - again
| The dust mote strikes aga
Same thing happened to me. You could try compressed air into the left
side of the scanner. There was a report that that worked, but it did for
me only very temporarily. Maybe I was too timid.
I had no problem with Polaroid. They asked only for month of purchase
and serial number, gave me a
That's good news. I'm pretty sure I registered it. I'll call them on
Monday...
Tom
Same thing happened to me. You could try compressed air into the left
side of the scanner. There was a report that that worked, but it did for
me only very temporarily. Maybe I was too timid.
I had no
Tom,
Actually after some fits and starts progress is being made on the slide
feeder. I canot at tis time give you a delivery date but is more than a
gleam in Polaroid's eye.
David
-Original Message-
From: Tom Scales [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2001 9:18 PM
To:
That's good news, although I noticed you didn't mention the neg feeder,
which is what I truly want.oh well.
Tom
-
Tom,
Actually after some fits and starts progress is being made on the slide
feeder. I canot at tis time give you a delivery date but is more than a
gleam in Polaroid's
I have been having problems with batch scanning using Insight as well as
Vuescan 7.0+.
With Insight, I can do thumbnails, select the images I wish to scan and then
press Scan Selected. The scanner is just stopping and locking up seemingly
at random when doing this batch scanning, usually when
One more try
There are wnaspi32.dll files on the Win 98SE and Win98 CD ROMS
Win98SE in the Win98_44.CAB directory
http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q238/7/67.ASP
WIN98 in the Win98_40.CAB directory
http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q188/4/34.ASP
Might try looking
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 1:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: SS4000: Aspi32/Advansys for Win 2000
One more try
There are wnaspi32.dll files on the Win 98SE and Win98 CD ROMS
Win98SE in the Win98_44.CAB directory
http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q238/7
Frank Paris writes:
"I never even opened up my Advansys envelope, since I already had a SCSI
card, the Adaptec 2930. At any rate, I cut it open just for your benefit,
and found that the wnaspi32 file had a 1998 date on it! I bought the SS4000
towards the end of 2000, too! It has no Windows 2000
"B.Twieg" wrote:
Frank Paris writes:
"I never even opened up my Advansys envelope, since I already had a SCSI
card, the Adaptec 2930. At any rate, I cut it open just for your benefit,
and found that the wnaspi32 file had a 1998 date on it! I bought the SS4000
towards the end of 2000,
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of B.Twieg
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 8:46 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: SS4000: Aspi32/Advansys for Win 2000
Thanks very much for checking, Frank. If all else fails, I'll
]]On Behalf Of Chuck Skinner
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 8:25 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: SS4000: Aspi32/Advansys for Win 2000
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of B.Twieg
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 8:46 AM
Bill,
Some very timely issues here. I'm looking at getting a new system within
the next month for scanning and Photoshop. I have a SS4000 and am thinking
seriously of Win2K Professional, or another Win98 SE computer. Therefore
I'm waiting with baited breath for the answer to your questions.
On 25 Feb 2001, at 5:54, B.Twieg wrote:
I've been succesfully using the Polaroid SS4000 with Polacolor Insight and
Vuescan on Windows 98/Me for over a year. But I'm having a problem with
Windows 2000:
1. When I first tried to install the SS4000 on win2K, after first installing
the latest
Check out Ed Hamrick's Vuescan site for the link to the Win2000 ASPI driver.
You most likely cannot use the one from other Windoze versions.
Bob Reilly
-Original Message-
From: B.Twieg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2001 8:55 AM
To: filmscanners
Subject:
PROTECTED]
http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Larry Berman
Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2001 6:28 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: SS4000 on Windows
that
comes with Win 2000 itself. I didn't have to download it from Advansys.
Thanks for your help.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Florian Rist
Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2001 7:04 AM
To: B.Twieg
Cc: filmscanners
Subject: Re: filmscanners
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Larry Berman
Some very timely issues here. I'm looking at getting a new system within
the next month for scanning and Photoshop. I have a SS4000 and am thinking
seriously of Win2K Professional, or another Win98 SE computer. Therefore
I'm waiting with
Does anyone (David Hemingway in particular) know approx. when these two
items will be available.
TIA GreetingsPreben
Message-
From: Preben Kristensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 9:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: filmscanners: SS4000: PCI 5.0 50-Slide Auto-feeder
Does anyone (David Hemingway in particular) know approx. when these two
items
Michael Wilkinson wrote:
Most of us just ignored it !!!
: In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Laurie
Solomon
: wrote:
:
: you are still more or less *c*nt* and can afford
:
: Eh!!!
:
: Brian Rumary, England
:
: http://freespace.virgin.net/brian.rumary/homepage.htm
But he's a "virgin"
Laurie Solomon wrote:
I never intended to write anything of the sort. The computer skipped some
characters in transmitting the message. It should have read: "you are still
more or less current and can afford" Sorry about that.
Was that Freudian web-slip?
Art
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Arthur Entlich
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 3:35 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000 real value?
Laurie Solomon wrote:
I never intended to write anything of the sort. The computer skipped some
or another; but typically the errors are caught by the spell checker
before transmission.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Arthur Entlich
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 3:35 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000
Laurie:
Thanks for your philosphical approach. I am terminating this discussion
before it gets out of hand in the sense that it clogs this List with OT
matters.
Hart Corbett
--
From: "Laurie Solomon" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: SS4000 a
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Laurie Solomon
wrote:
you are still more or less *cunt* and can afford
Eh!!!
Brian Rumary, England
http://freespace.virgin.net/brian.rumary/homepage.htm
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2001 3:45 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Pigmented inks was Re: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000
real value?
snip!
I recently bought one of their so-called 1200dpi flatbed scanners, which had
worse image sharpness than the cheap 600dpi
PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of B.Rumary
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 6:42 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000 real value?
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Laurie Solomon
wrote:
you are still more or less *cunt* and can afford
Eh!!!
Brian Rumary, England
http://freespace.
Most of us just ignored it !!!
- Original Message -
From: "B.Rumary" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 12:41 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000 real value?
: In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Laurie
Solomon
: wrote:
:
: you are still mo
Epson tries to walk a fine line on this matter. One the one hand, they
are absolutely within their rights to refuse service, or charge for
service for any printer returned during warranty which has head problems
which could be related to the ink used, and in fact, I would go as far
as saying
--
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Derek Clarke)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000 real value?
Date: Sun, Jan 28, 2001, 4:00 AM
There are a load of large format Stylus Pro models that appear to use the
same ink technology as the 2000P and therefore might have
John Woodworth wrote:
Here is a quote from the FAQ's section of epson's website
(http://files.support.epson.com/txt/pho127/pho127f1.txt) which may be of
interest:
"Q: Can the Epson ink cartridges be refilled or can 3rd party ink
cartridges be used without voiding the warranty?
A:
Hi Art.
Arthur Entlich wrote:
Epson tries to walk a fine line on this matter. One the one hand, they
are absolutely within their rights to refuse service, or charge for
service for any printer returned during warranty which has head problems
which could be related to the ink used, and in
Interesting to note that many, many piezography users have had printers
replaced by Epson under warranty despite using pigmented inks and
retrofitted continuous inking systems -- despite having told Epson what
they'd done.
--
Johnny Deadman
http://www.pinkheadedbug.com
We seem to be misunderstanding one another. I have an 860, and am quite
happy with it. I expect to be concerned about longevity in due course. I
believe my printer will take unchipped archival pigmented ink cartridges
from 3rd party sources. It is also my understanding that those sources will
"Robert DeCandido" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You do not void your warranty by using third party inks in an
Epson. If you need to return the printer for servicing, just remove
the CIS and re-install the Epson cartridges. See the Inkjetmall web
site (Cone Peizography, eg) for a discussion of
"Hart or Mary Jo Corbett" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for clearing away the fog, so to speak! What you say certainly
sounds logical to my unscientific mind. Gives me something more to think
about. It's looking like I'll have to wait a few more years, if possible,
before a good archival
]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000 real value?
On Wed, 24 Jan 2001 14:01:40 -0600 Robert Kehl
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
However, when
something better comes along my 2000P will be up for sale. I'll
let you know
in a hundred years how the prints are holding up
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Derek Clarke
Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2001 4:15 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000 real value?
Does anyone else think that Epson are producing new printers too
1 - 100 of 195 matches
Mail list logo
