Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Austin writes:
What's illogical, is any discussion with you.
You'll note that personal attacks are absent from my posts, but I do provide
evidence for my assertions. In contrast, your posts are mostly personal
attacks, but evidence for your assertions is
I believe you are both seriously damaged goods, who deserve each other.
The only problem is, we, the other members of this list, do NOT deserve
either of you.
Excuse me, Arthur? No one deserves YOU! There was no cause for your insult
and your comments are absolutely inappropriate and are
Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Nobody provided any documentation proving
any peculiar risk to buying or developing film abroad.
I encourage children to ask questions when they need further information
or are being inquisitive. However, I have no patience for spoiled
children who ask why or
On Sun, 9 Sep 2001 19:27:51 -0500 Tom Scales ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
BS.
It is a hoax.
Shut UP
Tom
THIS THREAD STOPS HERE. IF YOU WANT TO ABUSE EACH OTHER DO IT IN PRIVATE
MAIL.
Regards
Tony Sleep
http://www.halftone.co.uk - Online portfolio exhibit; + film scanner info
Austin writes:
Not necessarily. That does not mean that other
airlines did not use magnetic trays.
This is another fallacy in your technique. There is no reason to assume that
any airline has ever used magnetic trays, unless some airline comes forward and
actually says so. I don't know of
Austin writes:
Did you ever think that the hoax that you
claim was inaccurate for ONLY those airlines,
and that for another airline it may have been
true? No, of course not.
It would be an illogical extrapolation. If it is untrue for one aircraft, the
one actually named, and if there is
Not necessarily. That does not mean that other
airlines did not use magnetic trays.
This is another fallacy in your technique.
There is no fallacy in my technique (much your claim of another, since
you have never claimed a first), just because I know that you are wrong, and
that you do
I apologize to the news group for partaking in this utterly foolish game.
This is the last post I will do on airline trays.
Did you ever think that the hoax that you
claim was inaccurate for ONLY those airlines,
and that for another airline it may have been
true? No, of course not.
Austin writes:
There is no fallacy in my technique (much your
claim of another, since you have never claimed
a first), just because I know that you are wrong, and
that you do not know what you are talking about.
There are several fallacies in this statement alone. There is a personal
Austin writes:
What's illogical, is any discussion with you.
You'll note that personal attacks are absent from my posts, but I do provide
evidence for my assertions. In contrast, your posts are mostly personal
attacks, but evidence for your assertions is absent. As usual, I shall leave
the
There are also some airplane trays that are
magnetic so they do not rattle (the ones in first
class typically that fold down into the arm rest),
and they can effect magnetic media also.
This is incorrect; it is a longstanding hoax.
I'm sorry, Anthony, but your claim of a hoax is
Austin writes:
I'm sorry, Anthony, but your claim of a hoax
is false. Now, you're an expert on airline trays?
No, but after talking to Airbus and the IATA about this very hoax, I was able to
confirm that it is baseless. The original hoax was a circulating Internet story
about two people
Austin writes:
I'm sorry, Anthony, but your claim of a hoax
is false. Now, you're an expert on airline trays?
No, but after talking to Airbus and the IATA about this very
hoax, I was able to
confirm that it is baseless.
Oh. Only Airbus and the IATA know anything about this. Whom at
who's
That should have been whose, sorry ;-)
It is an urban legend. Visit this link for the details:
http://urbanlegends.about.com/library/bllaptop.htm
Now, can we get back to scanning and put this pissing contest to bed.
Tom
Austin writes:
I'm sorry, Anthony, but your claim of a hoax
is false. Now, you're an expert on
Oh. Only Airbus and the IATA know anything
about this.
The original hoax specifically mentioned an Airbus A340 and
Sabena airlines,
although other verifiable details were lacking, as usual.
Did you ever think that the hoax that you claim was inaccurate for ONLY
those airlines, and that
Not necessarily. That does not mean that other airlines did not use
magnetic trays. The source for the report I had were far and above any
Internet folklore. The issue may have been cured since the issue was first
discovered. If memory serves me correctly, the report I had was done in
1993/4
Do you actually read? I posted the link showing that this is an urban
legend - a hoax, quite some time ago.
This entire thread is ridiculous. Grow up and shut up.
Tom
From: Austin Franklin
Did you ever think that the hoax that you claim was inaccurate for ONLY
those airlines, and that for
BS.
It is a hoax.
Shut UP
Tom
- Original Message -
From: Austin Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2001 7:19 PM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: X-ray and digital camera
Not necessarily. That does not mean that other airlines did not use
Of course; it might get stolen or damaged. :-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Stephen
Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2001 11:35 AM
To: Film Scanner
Subject: filmscanners: X-ray and digital camera
Hello,
Now that film and x-ray has been
No. Digital cameras and digital storage media are unaffected by x rays. They
may behave strangely if they are operating _during_ the scan, but there is no
lasting effect on anything.
- Original Message -
From: Stephen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Film Scanner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday,
Anthony, your answer is entirely irrelevant, you did not read the question.
The question had nothing to do with the X-Rays, but the MACHINES.
The correct answer is YES, an airport security machine CAN disrupt the data
on any magnetic media. Some of them have strong magnetics (large motors).
I
Anthony, your answer is entirely irrelevant, you
did not read the question. The question had
nothing to do with the X-Rays, but the MACHINES.
You are correct; I assumed that x rays were still being addressed. My mistake.
I'm not aware of any documented problems with magnetic fields
23 matches
Mail list logo
