f the
silver crystals in the emulsion which happens less with film scanners if I
am not mistaken.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Erik Kaffehr
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 5:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners:minolta an
Hi!
I got the impression that Multi Format Set is just a glassless carrier with
mask you can cut yourself. Vuescan, which is avalable for 40 USD (I think)
does 2820 scan across an MF film, but covers just a 24 mm area. Vuescan can
bed downloaded from www.hamrick.com/vsm.html for test.
Did you
Erik,
> The Minolta DiMAGE Scan Multi PRO does 4800 PPI on 135 film, and 3200 on
> 120. Scanning at 4800 PPI may give som additional resolution in one
> direction, depending on the physical size of the pixel. The other
> direction
> is entirely interpolated.
That's not what I understand. I beli
at an optical 4800 dpi when in reality it is an
> interpolated 4800 dpi.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Wilson, Paul
> Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 8:32 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subj
om: LAURIE SOLOMON [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 12:19 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: filmscanners:minolta and med format
>
>
> >For the Scan Multi Pro, this is misleading at best.
>
> Ok, I am willing to concede and accept th
N [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 12:19 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: filmscanners:minolta and med format
>
>
> >For the Scan Multi Pro, this is misleading at best.
>
> Ok, I am willing to concede and accept this since I was
&g
ROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Wilson, Paul
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 8:32 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: filmscanners:minolta and med format
For the Scan Multi Pro, this is misleading at best.
First of all, based on the way the film holders work, it's physically
impossible to
> The hardware is perfectly capable of scanning a 40 mm wide piece
> of Medium Format film at 4800 dpi using the medium format film
> holders. The key is that the lens moves in and out - it can scan
> 60 mm width at 4800 dpi or 40 mm width at 3200 dpi.
Alright, now I'm confused. So is the lens
In a message dated 12/18/2001 11:43:46 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Alright, now I'm confused. So is the lens moving if you scan 40mm wide or
> 60mm wide? At what point, in terms of film width, does it start
> interpolating?
When you scan at 4800 dpi, the lens is closer to the film so
In a message dated 12/18/2001 9:33:40 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> First of all, based on the way the film holders work, it's physically
> impossible to scan a piece of medium format film in the way you're
> describing. That is, unless you cut up the film in 24mm wide sections and
> us
om: LAURIE SOLOMON [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 1:52 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: filmscanners:minolta and med format
>
>
> I think some clarification is needed hear. The Minolta
> medium format film
> scanners which includes bot
: Monday, December 17, 2001 10:26 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: filmscanners:minolta and med format
No, that's not what I said.
Simply stated, the Minolta Scan Multi Pro (and the various versions of the
Scan Multi) do not require you to stitch pieces of an image together in
You as the
operator do not need to do anything out of ordinary to achieve 4800 dpi.
Paul Wilson
> -Original Message-
> From: Andy D'Angelo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 9:07 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: filmscanners:minolta and
>seem to actually get more usable detail from MF transparencies at 4800 vs.
>3200.
>
>Paul Wilson
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Andy D'Angelo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2001 7:50 AM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>&g
, December 17, 2001 1:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners:minolta and med format
Hi!
Just want to add that Minolta Dimage Scan Multi Pro also has a real 3200 PPI
resolution for 120 (MF) film, which is almost a three times improvement over
older models.
Regards
Erik Kaffehr
lördagen
o
> as to relocate a new section in the proper orientation in the proper
> location within the universal film holder.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andy D'Angelo
> Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2001 6:50 AM
>
actually get more usable detail from MF transparencies at 4800 vs.
3200.
Paul Wilson
> -Original Message-
> From: Andy D'Angelo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2001 7:50 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: filmscanners:minolta and med f
on within the universal film holder.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andy D'Angelo
Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2001 6:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners:minolta and med format
Greetings,
does anyone have any experienc
18 matches
Mail list logo
