Re: filmscanners: Minolta Multi Pro with negs

2001-12-16 Thread Victor Landweber
To the list: I second Tomasz Zakrzewski's request for information concerning the Minolta Scan Multi Pro's performance as a negative scanner. That's what I want to use it for, and have only seen one user's report that was negative about its use with negatives. Are there any contravening

Re: filmscanners: Minolta Multi Pro rez for 24x65 panoramic format

2001-12-01 Thread DRP
You can scan 24 x 65 at 4800 dpi using VueScan on the Scan Multi Pro. I added the same max resolution mode as VueScan uses with the Scan Multi (it wll scan 42 x 65 mm at 5800 dpi). Ed Hamrick Sounds great, Ed! Together with Vs, my old HPS20 was a good compromise to learn scanning negs,

Re: filmscanners: Minolta Multi Pro rez for 24x65 panoramic format

2001-12-01 Thread EdHamrick
In a message dated 12/1/2001 5:05:40 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The perspective of paying so much Nikon 8000 nightmares, even with ICE, for this particular use was really boring! In my limited use of the Nikon LS-8000, the SprintScan 120 and the Scan Multi Pro, I didn't come across

Re: filmscanners: Minolta Multi Pro

2001-11-30 Thread EdHamrick
In a message dated 11/29/2001 9:38:28 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The stepper motor can actually move at 9600 dpi, which is evenly divisible by both 4800 and 3200. Regards, Ed Hamrick When the stepper motor moves less than the optical resolution isn't that just a software

Re: filmscanners: Minolta Multi Pro

2001-11-30 Thread Bernie Ess
more than this one machine. Curious greetings, Bernhard - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 8:05 AM Subject: Re: filmscanners: Minolta Multi Pro In a message dated 11/29/2001 9:38:28 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes

Re: filmscanners: Minolta Multi Pro rez for 24x65 panoramic format

2001-11-30 Thread EdHamrick
In a message dated 11/30/2001 10:56:43 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What optical resolution does offer the Minolta multi software for 24x65 negs? If low, could the optical system be turned to max (4800dpi) by Vuescan, like Ed made in the old Minolta MF? You can scan 24 x 65

Re: filmscanners: Minolta Multi Pro

2001-11-30 Thread EdHamrick
In a message dated 11/30/2001 9:20:31 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: could you tell us some of your impressions about the Minolta Multi Pro when testing it for your software - what about overall sharpness, shadow noise etc. A lot of people out there seem to be interested in getting some

Re: filmscanners: Minolta Multi Pro

2001-11-29 Thread EdHamrick
In a message dated 11/29/2001 5:48:43 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: the Minolta claims 4800 dpi with a 7260 pixels per line CCD. How do they do that? They move the lens closer to the film when scanning at 4800 dpi. The lens is farther from the film when scanning at 3200 dpi. Minolta

RE: filmscanners: Minolta Multi Pro

2001-11-29 Thread Austin Franklin
Why would one buy a multi format scanner to get the same size file regardless of format. I don't understand. Why should the format of the film define the enlargement size? With a film scanner that provides resolution proportional to the film format, providing the film is decent enough

RE: filmscanners: Minolta Multi Pro

2001-11-29 Thread Wilson, Paul
Yes, we're talking about the Minolta Scan Multi Pro. If you dig deep enough you will find the optical resolution for MF which is 3200 dpi. This should explain the difference in CCD. In any event, 3200dpi is plenty for a scan of a 6x7 transparency and the scans are excellent. Paul Wilson

RE: filmscanners: Minolta Multi Pro

2001-11-29 Thread Wilson, Paul
Ed, The stepper motor can actually move at 9600 dpi, which is evenly divisible by both 4800 and 3200. Does this mean they are doing something more than what is usually done for interpolation? Also, I downloaded the trial version of the latest VueScan and used it with my Minolta DSMP. An odd

Re: filmscanners: Minolta Multi Pro

2001-11-29 Thread david soderman
Winsor Crosby wrote: On other scanners interpolated resolution is 2 or 3 times the optical resolution. It is often said that it is a false number and should be ignored. What is the Minolta's optical resolution on medium format? Is it actually about 2000 dpi? Why would one buy a multi

Re: filmscanners: Minolta Multi Pro

2001-11-29 Thread Winsor Crosby
In a message dated 11/29/2001 5:48:43 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: the Minolta claims 4800 dpi with a 7260 pixels per line CCD. How do they do that? They move the lens closer to the film when scanning at 4800 dpi. The lens is farther from the film when scanning at 3200 dpi.

RE: filmscanners: Minolta Multi Pro

2001-11-29 Thread Winsor Crosby
Why would one buy a multi format scanner to get the same size file regardless of format. I don't understand. Why should the format of the film define the enlargement size? With a film scanner that provides resolution proportional to the film format, providing the film is decent enough

RE: filmscanners: Minolta Multi Pro

2001-11-29 Thread Austin Franklin
The stepper motor can actually move at 9600 dpi, which is evenly divisible by both 4800 and 3200. Does this mean they are doing something more than what is usually done for interpolation? No matter how fine the stepper motor is, the CCD can only see at the resolution of the field-of-view

RE: filmscanners: Minolta Multi Pro

2001-11-29 Thread Hemingway, David J
, November 29, 2001 9:40 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Re: filmscanners: Minolta Multi Pro Winsor Crosby wrote: On other scanners interpolated resolution is 2 or 3 times the optical resolution. It is often said that it is a false number and should be ignored. What is the Minolta's

RE: filmscanners: Minolta Multi Pro

2001-11-29 Thread Austin Franklin
Why would one buy a multi format scanner to get the same size file regardless of format. I don't understand. Why should the format of the film define the enlargement size? With a film scanner that provides resolution proportional to the film format, providing the film is decent