Al MacKenzie wrote:
> Vuescan6.2 seemed to work much better for bringing out shadow detail than
> the Minolta software.
Odd. I find the opposite with my Minolta Elite.
> Why do the scans appear darker than what appears visually in the slide?
I find this, too, on my Elite. Make sure the "Auto
ED]
> Subject: RE: Vuescan6.2 and Minolta Dual Scan II
>
> > > A couple of questions-
> > > 1. Why do multiple scans improve shadow detail- I assume
> > > that it is signal averaging. Does it effect
> > > resolution with image shifting between scan
Ed writes ...
> In a message dated 10/6/2000 10:25:41 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
>
> > I found that the scan's brightness, for one particular negative,
was
> > extremely sensitive to the whitepoint % setting. I could vary it
from
> > 0.5% to 0.7% and the resulting scan would be noticeab
My Dual Scan II arrived last night and very shortly I could see that I was
going to have trouble with shadow detail in some of my slides. So based on
what I have been reading on this very informative listserver for the past two
weeks, I downloaded (and subsequently paid for) VueScan6.2.
Vuesc
In a message dated 10/6/2000 9:13:14 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
> 1. Why do multiple scans improve shadow detail- I assume that it is signal
> averaging. Does it effect resolution with image shifting between scans?
Multiple scans don't make as much difference with the Scan Dual II
sin
In a message dated 10/6/2000 10:25:41 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I found that the scan's brightness, for one particular negative, was
> extremely sensitive to the whitepoint % setting. I could vary it from
> 0.5% to 0.7% and the resulting scan would be noticeably brighter.
This happe
In a message dated 10/6/2000 1:42:39 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I'm using a Multi II, while not a Dual II it pretty much has the same
> features. When doing a multipass scan I can't notice any difference in
the
> image quality even when doing a 16x mutlipass scan.
The only differe
In a message dated 10/6/2000 7:04:51 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Ed Hamrick the author of Vuscan has mentioned several time that
> because of the very low noise level on the Sprintscan 4000 multiscanning is
> of very marginal value. Despite this we will be adding multiscanning to our
>
- Original Message -
From: "Hemingway, David J" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 06, 2000 2:08 PM
Subject: RE: Vuescan6.2 and Minolta Dual Scan II
> Unfortunately there is no free lunch here as the whole process tends
&g
Will this be Multi-pass Multi-Scanning or Multi-Scan Multiscanning?
One moves the film/ccd across the whole frame of film, then repositions and rescans.
The later scans the film multiple times _before_ moving, which has no effect on
sharpness, only reduces the noise.
alan
>> Despite this w
000 11:33 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Vuescan6.2 and Minolta Dual Scan II
> > A couple of questions-
> > 1. Why do multiple scans improve shadow detail- I assume
> > that it is signal averaging. Does it effect
> > resolution with image shifting between scans?
&
> > A couple of questions-
> > 1. Why do multiple scans improve shadow detail- I assume
> > that it is signal averaging. Does it effect
> > resolution with image shifting between scans?
>
> I was intending on downloading VS6.2 to my office computer today,
>just so I could study the help file
Al writes ...
> A couple of questions-
> 1. Why do multiple scans improve shadow detail- I assume
> that it is signal averaging. Does it effect
> resolution with image shifting between scans?
I was intending on downloading VS6.2 to my office computer today,
just so I could study the help
13 matches
Mail list logo
