Good Morning,
I realize this may be like asking which is better, a Ford or a Chevrolet.
I just recieved the Poloraid 4000 and am trying to decide from reading the
messages which would be best for a novice like me, the Poloraid, VueScan or
the Silverfast. Of course the Poloraid and SilverFast cam
on 9/30/01 9:00 AM PST, JackG wrote:
> I just recieved the Poloraid 4000 and am trying to decide from reading the
> messages which would be best for a novice like me, the Poloraid, VueScan or
> the Silverfast. Of course the Poloraid and SilverFast came with the scanner,
> but $40.00 for the VueS
John,
I have no experience with the SilverFast software but absolutely LOVE
Vuescan for trannies, at least. I'm an experienced scanner but new to the
SS4000 myself.
I've spent $40 on far less useful things. :) Hamrick software has a full
featured demo you can d/l from www.hamrick.com that you
Thanks David
al Message -
From: "JackG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2001 11:00 AM
Subject: filmscanners: Best scanner software
| Good Morning,
|
| I realize this may be like asking which is better, a Ford or a Chevrolet.
|
| I just recieved th
CTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2001 18:56
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Best scanner software
John,
I have no experience with the SilverFast software but absolutely LOVE
Vuescan for trannies, at least. I'm an ex
I take it from your comment that Insight does not have provision for
IT-8 calibration. Does it at least have provision for using the
profile made with Silverfast? What I want in a scanner software is
the ability to set endpoints, get essentially the same tone/color
balance as the original (profi
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: filmscanners: Best scanner software
I take it from your comment that Insight does not have provision for
IT-8 calibration. Does it at least have provision for using the
profile made with Silverfast? What I want in a scanner software is
the ability to set
I'd also recommend trying Polaroid Insight first, and I agree with David's other comments shown here, as well.
If you think you need the power of SilverFast, then make sure you upgrade to version 5.5 if you scan color negatives Version 5.5 gives you something called NegaFix and it's really neede
"Alex Z" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> BTW, do you think 2800-2900 dpi is good enough for quality A3 sized print
> (about 260-270 dpi and that size) or 4000 dpi would gain quality
noticeably ?
I've made nice A3 prints on my Epson 1160 using scans at 2700dpi with a
Nikon LS30. Scans on a SS4000 lo
- Original Message -
From: Alex Z <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2001 7:38 PM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Best scanner software
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Best scanner software
> BTW, do you think 2800-2900 dpi is good enough for quality
A3 sized print
> (about 260-270 dpi
> and that size)
Yes, if it's an inkjet print, because the printer resolution
is less than this (approx 200dpi sent to the printe
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2001
5:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Best
scanner software
I'd also recommend trying Polaroid
Insight first, and I agree with David's other comments shown here, as well.
If you think you need the power of SilverFast, then
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Best scanner software
"Alex Z" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> BTW, do you think 2800-2900 dpi is good enough for quality A3 sized print
> (about 260-270 dpi and that size) or 4000 dpi would gain quality
noticeably ?
I've made nice A3 p
eciable softening of the image from the operation of cleaning algorithm, so I too
use it all the time.
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Alex Z [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 4:55 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Best scanner software
Thanks for th
; Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 01:10
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: filmscanners: Best scanner software
>
> "Alex Z" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > BTW, do you think 2800-2900 dpi is good enough for quality A3 sized print
> > (about 260-270 dpi and tha
At 8:38 PM +0200 30-9-01, Alex Z wrote:
>Currently I see several choices: Nikon CoolScan IV ED, Minolta Elite (or
>Elite II being released now) for 2900 and 2820 dpi resolutions respectively
>or Polaroid 4000 and Nikon CoolScan 4000ED (which is actually out of my
>budget even for the future :-( ).
"Bill Fernandez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> reduction in sharpness. I have another image (Kodachrome 64) where
> ICE and GEM made the entire image VERY soft. So apparently they can
> work for you or against you depending on the image and/or film.
Try Vuescan on the same slide. The IR cleanin
>At 8:38 PM +0200 30-9-01, Alex Z wrote:
>>Currently I see several choices: Nikon CoolScan IV ED, Minolta Elite (or
>>Elite II being released now) for 2900 and 2820 dpi resolutions respectively
>>or Polaroid 4000 and Nikon CoolScan 4000ED (which is actually out of my
>>budget even for the future :
: filmscanners: Best scanner software
At 8:38 PM +0200 30-9-01, Alex Z wrote:
>Currently I see several choices: Nikon CoolScan IV ED, Minolta Elite (or
>Elite II being released now) for 2900 and 2820 dpi resolutions respectively
>or Polaroid 4000 and Nikon CoolScan 4000ED (which is actually out of m
20 matches
Mail list logo
