he throws it in my direction--I could use a
portable backup, and could keep up with the List while I'm fishing or on
vacation.
Best regards--LRA
>From: rafeb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: filmscanners: RE: fi
Dan wrote:
>It was set to 16-bit (True Color), so I changed it to 24-bit (High Color)
>and rebooted. Still see the lines in the sky, but this is only a Dell
>Inspiron 3500 notebook PC with a NeoMagic MagicMedia 256AV card and a 14"
>LCD screen. No doubt something in that mix isn't up to snuff.
At 11:33 AM 7/20/01 +1000, Rob wrote:
>Rafe wrote:
>>I'm willing to bet that Dan Honemann has his video
>>set to 256 colors ("indexed" color.)
>
>Some video drivers in Windows (particularly the generic Windows ones as
>opposed to OEM) only display 256 colours despite being set to 16bit or 24bit.
>
Rafe wrote:
>I'm willing to bet that Dan Honemann has his video
>set to 256 colors ("indexed" color.)
Some video drivers in Windows (particularly the generic Windows ones as
opposed to OEM) only display 256 colours despite being set to 16bit or 24bit.
It was one reason I had to throw out a video
Dan wrote:
>One thing I've always been curious about is what causes the topographical
>map type of lines you see in the blue sky portion of this image:
>http://www.chebucto.ns.ca/~taiji/gallery/t21.htm
>I see this sort of artifact a lot in jpegs on the web. Is this what is
>called "jaggies?" Do
Lynn wrote:
> Hoo, boy, that *would* be useful! Presently, every definition is
> about a half-click away from the next guy's definition. If I had
> a website, I'd give it a go (I've got *plenty* of examples!)--
> maybe some kind-sprited, web-savvy member will do it?
I'd be happy to put things onl
