(Jerry, I copied you on this because it appears Alan has a similar issue to
yours. I am still trying to get my website updated so I can post the
material about correcting images with these problems. But, now that I have
seen Alan's scan's I am beginning to think that you and he may have bad or
:29 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Skin tones
In a message dated 6/18/2001 1:42:44 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The result compared to Nikonscan 3.1 can be seen at
http://www.littlebarn.com/test/index.htm
After autolevel and curve correction in Photoshop I get an image from
John Bradbury [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a raw scan file but its 74 meg at 2700 resolution!
I can reduce the res to give a smaller file. Is that OK?
You'd need to crop it down to a smaller area. You also need to enable
compression on the raw file.
Rob
Hi Ed
I have a raw scan file but its 74 meg at 2700 resolution!
I can reduce the res to give a smaller file. Is that OK?
Thanks
John Bradbury
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 9:29 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Skin tones
On Tue, 19 Jun 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you e-mail me the raw scan file for this image,
I'll look into whether there's something I can do in VueScan
to make this improved contrast be the default (I may have
something incorrect in the default contrast that's used
when generic film
On Sun, 17 Jun 2001 18:14:50 Mikael Risedal ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
There are something else with VueScan just now if I compare VueScan to
NikonScan and Silverfast. Little bit flat, doll and color less.
Yes, I see low saturation too with VS+SS4000. Doesn't bother me personally
as I
.
Question to Ed: would it be possible to achieve the end result without going
through PS?
Thanks
John Bradbury
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 17, 2001 4:31 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Skin tones
In a message dated 6/17/2001 1:17:38 PM
.
Mikael Risedal
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tony Sleep)
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Skin tones
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 15:15 +0100 (BST)
On Fri, 15 Jun 2001 12:31:15 -0400 John Bradbury ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
I also find that the flatness you
, 2001 6:14 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Skin tones
| Tony
| There are something else with VueScan just now if I compare VueScan to
| NikonScan and Silverfast. Little bit flat, doll and color less.
|
| I have send MR Hamrick 3 test pictures scanned by NikonScan, VueScan and
| Silverfast+ LS2000
In a message dated 6/17/2001 1:17:38 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There are something else with VueScan just now if I compare VueScan to
NikonScan and Silverfast. Little bit flat, doll and color less.
I have send MR Hamrick 3 test pictures scanned by NikonScan, VueScan and
,
Silverfast
Scanners: LS2000. LS4000. Polaroid 35+
From: Maris V. Lidaka, Sr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Skin tones
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 14:52:31 -0500
The flatness is good - it means that the highlights and shadows have
I wish this had been mentioned in the Help files.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 17, 2001 3:31 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Skin tones
[snipped]
| When the Color|Restore colors option is enabled, the
| choice of film type
.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: Mikael Risedal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 17, 2001 11:00 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Skin tones
| Maris
|
| I think everyone will gain to have a rely good VueScan software. I will.
| (Spec. with negative film ) I
On Fri, 15 Jun 2001 12:31:15 -0400 John Bradbury ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
I also find that the flatness you describe is very difficult to
correct
In 16 bits, set levels and increase saturation. In 8 bits, you'll probably
create contouring.
Regards
Tony Sleep
http://www.halftone.co.uk
John
I took a negative and did a test on NikonScan 3.1 VueScan 7.1 and
Silverfast 5.2. Did a auto calibrating nothing more on SF and NS.
Yes same results as you have. VueScan looks not dead but more flat and
blue in the scan picture. Tried different settings i VueScan but the
flatness are
I'm glad to know it's not just me!
I also find that the flatness you describe is very difficult to correct.
John Bradbury
- Original Message -
From: Mikael Risedal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2001 3:43 PM
Subject: filmscanners: Skin tones
John
I
and Vuescan for studio shots.
- Original Message -
From: Mikael Risedal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 10:06 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Skin tones
Hello John
I measure both pictures taken indoors of the lady in black hair.
That one you think
: Re: filmscanners: Skin tones
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 16:08:37 -0400
Hi Mikael
The white background has made the difference. I did make the final prints
from the Vuescan image, but after working the yellowier nikonscan image in
Photoshop I get a printable image that is a little warmer.
The thing I
Using a Nikon LS 3 with both NikonScan 3.1, and the latest version of
Vuescan I find a wide variation in skin tones under different light sources
see the images at:
http://www.littlebarn.com/test/index.htm
The film used for both images is Kodak Portra 160 NC. Image 1 is with studio
lighting,
Lund
Sweden
From: John Bradbury [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: filmscanners: Skin tones
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 16:57:31 -0400
Using a Nikon LS 3 with both NikonScan 3.1, and the latest version of
Vuescan I find a wide variation in skin tones under
20 matches
Mail list logo
