On 24.11.2002 23:47 Uhr, Darcy James Argue wrote
>
> On Sunday, November 24, 2002, at 03:33 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
>
>> No, it is an optional setting. If the mailing list owner chose to do
>> so, he could change that setting so that [EMAIL PROTECTED] was
>> the REPLY-TO address.
>
> Then,
Le lundi, 25 nov 2002, à 14:50 America/Montreal, Philip Aker a écrit :
I vote for Reply-To-List as default if it wouldn't be any extra heavy
lifting for Henry.
Philip Aker
http://www.aker.ca
___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.sh
At 8:18 AM -0500 11/25/02, Éric Dussault wrote:
Le lundi, 25 nov 2002, à 07:57 America/Montreal, Christopher BJ Smith a écrit
If you really and truly want NO staff name, then make a staff style
that has the staff name hidden, and apply it to all appropriate
measures in the staff. Very easy.
C
Henry may not have any say in the matter -- the SHSU system
administrators may have laid down the law when they installed the
mailman software, that all lists will have Reply-To go to individuals.
And Henry is remarkable quiet on this list except in times of extreme
disaster. Perhaps he will c
On 2002/11/25 02:18 PM or thereabouts, Dennis W. Manasco
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> intoned:
> At 2:38 pm -0500 11/24/02, Darcy James Argue wrote:
>
>
>>> Is this a new feature or what?
>>
>> Yes. This is an incredibly stupid and undesirable feature of the
>> new mailing list software. The solution i
I vote for Reply-To-List as default if it wouldn't be any extra heavy
lifting for Henry.
Philip Aker
http://www.aker.ca
___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
At 2:38 pm -0500 11/24/02, Darcy James Argue wrote:
Is this a new feature or what?
Yes. This is an incredibly stupid and undesirable feature of the
new mailing list software. The solution is to choose "reply all"
when posting to the list. Or manually pasting in the address for
the Finale
E-mail(ing) must be your da(i)ley bread, then :-)
Klaas de Jong.
> From: Phil Daley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 13:46:30 -0500
> To: Klaaschello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [Finale] reply
>
> At 11/25/2002 01:36 PM, Klaaschello wrote:
>
>> Help, I was just getting used to
Help, I was just getting used to that very, very difficult action of hitting
a reply all button, and now somebody wants to change that ??
Klaas.
> From: Phil Daley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 13:11:35 -0500
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Finale] reply
>
> At 11/25/20
At 11/25/2002 03:12 AM, Patsy Moore wrote:
>>Then, uh, can we take a vote on that or something? Quite a few people
>>have complained about the new behavior, and I can't remember anyone
>>speaking out in its defense.
I vote to change it.
>Here I am, speaking out in its defence. In an ideal world
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Darcy James
Argue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>
>On Sunday, November 24, 2002, at 03:33 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
>
>> No, it is an optional setting. If the mailing list owner chose to do
>> so, he could change that setting so that [EMAIL PROTECTED] was
>> the REPLY
Le lundi, 25 nov 2002, à 07:57 America/Montreal, Christopher BJ Smith a écrit :
At 1:54 AM -0500 11/25/02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a way to turn off the staff name display on only selected systems? I'm working on a score for a composer who sometimes uses one singer's staff for another
Title: Re: [Finale] Staff name
display
At 1:54 AM -0500 11/25/02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a
way to turn off the staff name display on only selected systems? I'm
working on a score for a composer who sometimes uses one singer's
staff for another singer's part.
Linda Cummings
Allegro Mus
David H. Bailey writes:
> I believe, in addition to the staff styles to apply once page layout has
> been set properly, that you can optimize the score without actually
> removing any empty staves, if you wish. After you do that I believe
> each staff name in each system is editable independen
I believe, in addition to the staff styles to apply once page layout has
been set properly, that you can optimize the score without actually
removing any empty staves, if you wish. After you do that I believe
each staff name in each system is editable independently of all the
other systems in
Well, it doesn't strike me as if it is a purely musical inpute device
but rather is a sort of "magic fingers keyboard" for those who want to
"play around" with music. As for connecting through the PS/2 port, it
is a computer keyboard that also happens to have musical keys on it as well.
You ca
Thanks for your reassuring message, Rick!
David McKay
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~musicke
> I have used several different keyboards including the JV-30. I am running
a
> 1.8gig P4 with Windows XP Home (Pro at the school where I teach) and
WinFin
> 2003. Never had a problem w
> Is there a way to turn off the staff name display on only selected systems?
> I'm working on a score for a composer who sometimes uses one singer's staff
> for another singer's part.
Apply a Staff Style for the region which hides the staff name.
Best regards,
Jari Williamsson
ICQ #: 7803656
One of the McKays writes:
> Has anyone used a Roland JV 30 successfully with Windows XP installed?
> I'd hate to buy a new computer and not be able to do my slow MIDI step entry
> of WinFin files!
I think you instead should ask questions about the specific MIDI interface
that you're using for co
Title: Re: [Finale] Staff name display
Hi,
In the first place I would give each singer his/her own staff and optimize the systems in the layout (which your composer more or less did in his manuscript ...)
But then again you could define also less staves and use f.e. expressions to indicate which
20 matches
Mail list logo
