You can go to tape but you don't have to. Your MIDI program can play your
outboard synthesizer, which is connected to your sound-in port on the CPU
(probably it's actually an audio-out signal coming from your outboard
amplifier that you would connect, unless your synth is self-amplified). A
concurr
At 12:47 PM 7/10/03 -0400, Phil Daley wrote:
>You are still using the same power supply?
No, the *only* original component is the floppy drive ... and me. :)
The floppy drive is only for emergencies and the occasional clean boot for
upgrading hard drives or deep-scan virus checking. It gets used
And that's what makes our economic system!
Thanks all to this great information -- on my ancient MacPC I've come to
the conclusion that if I want my midi files to be on CD I must first go
to tape and transfer back in to the computer --- frankly the loss of
fidelity is minor compared to the qua
At 07/10/2003 10:32 AM, Dennis Bathory-Kitsz wrote:
>I have never bought a new machine. Each part was replaced as needed
Exactly.
>The machine in
>front of me began almost 11 years ago at 33MHz with 8MB of memory, 80MB
>hard drive, 13-inch monitor, "toy" sound card, and Windows 3.1.
I started 15
At 09:56 AM 7/10/03 -0400, Crystal Premo wrote:
>It seems that there
>is no end to it.
You are learning what PC owners have known for years -- that a computer is
a general-purpose tool that you optimize (if not customize) for yourself.
And it's a tool that, if it's to be applied to newer material
You are actually much more fortunate than I am in that my current machine,
which runs fine in OS 9, is really not up to date enough to run OS X
seriously. For me the next year will require a major investment to run OS X.
In addition I will need a new scanner, cd-burner, printer and several major
so
On 10.07.2003 14:41 Uhr, Crystal Premo wrote
>>> I don't know of _any_ audio application that will run without problems in
> the classic environment under OS X. Most of them won't run at all<<
>
> This seems like a really stupid move on the part of the OS developers,
> doesn't it?
It has rather
I don't know of _any_ audio application that will run without problems in
the classic environment under OS X. Most of them won't run at all<<
This seems like a really stupid move on the part of the OS developers,
doesn't it?
Crystal Premo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
On 08.07.2003 1:23 Uhr, Crystal Premo wrote
> What's the matter with Ultra Recorder? I have been using it all along.
> Does anybody know for sure if it is non-functional in the Classic
> environment?
I don't know of _any_ audio application that will run without problems in
the classic environmen
>
There are no problems with that machine other than it not being on the
Internet. The problems were all with the owner wa
When using OS X, you should only use Classic applications when there is no
OS X-native equivalent.<<
Well I guess there's nothing stopping me from doing it in OSX. Maybe I will
get better results.
Crystal Premo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Monday, Jul 7, 2003, at 16:26 America/Vancouver, Crystal Premo wrote:
What's the matter with Ultra Recorder? I have been using it all along.
I don't know if there's anything wrong with it. What you should do is
compare the AIFF output from it and one from iTunes to see if there's a
quality d
On Monday, July 7, 2003, at 07:23 PM, Crystal Premo wrote:
Because she needs to convert MIDI files to AIFFs, which iTunes
cannot do. However, I'm sure there's a freeware or shareware OS X
utility that could do the same thing<<
What's the matter with Ultra Recorder? I have been using it all
a
Excellent tip, Philip. I had no idea iTunes included this functionality<<
It sure doesn't on the Mac at the studio, which is running 9.2.2.
Crystal Premo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusSca
Because she needs to convert MIDI files to AIFFs, which iTunes cannot do.
However, I'm sure there's a freeware or shareware OS X utility that could
do the same thing<<
What's the matter with Ultra Recorder? I have been using it all along.
Does anybody know for sure if it is non-functional in
With a software synth installed, it is possible now for the computer to
internally interpret the midi commands and pull the necessary sound data
from the software synth, all much faster than in real time, so it is
possible to convert from midi to audio practically instantaneously. It
is import
On Monday, Jul 7, 2003, at 00:01 America/Vancouver, Darcy James Argue
wrote:
I've always been able to do this since the first version of iTunes
for OS X.
Excellent tip, Philip. I had no idea iTunes included this
functionality.
I remember another discussion from many months ago where we talked
On Monday, July 7, 2003, at 02:36 AM, Philip M. Aker wrote:
On Sunday, Jul 6, 2003, at 20:31 America/Vancouver, Darcy James Argue
wrote:
Because she needs to convert MIDI files to AIFFs, which iTunes cannot
do. However, I'm sure there's a freeware or shareware OS X utility
that could do the
On Sunday, Jul 6, 2003, at 20:31 America/Vancouver, Darcy James Argue
wrote:
Because she needs to convert MIDI files to AIFFs, which iTunes cannot
do. However, I'm sure there's a freeware or shareware OS X utility
that could do the same thing.
In iTunes:
Choose "Add to Library..." from its Fi
Hi,
MIDI to audio? Look for Midigraphy, which uses the sounds in the Quicktime
synth.
K.
> From: Richard Huggins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2003 22:32:42 -0500
> To: Finale List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [Finale] .aiff files
>
> Since MIDI is
Since MIDI is only data, not sounds, it must play something that has sounds.
So what gets converted? I've done very little of it, but when I last
"converted" MIDI I had Performer play it while running a second application
to record what was playing. Maybe you all can ed-u-ca-mate me as to a better
On Sunday, July 6, 2003, at 11:13 PM, Philip M. Aker wrote:
On Sunday, Jul 6, 2003, at 19:07 America/Vancouver, Crystal Premo
wrote:
Okay, I downloaded a version of Ultra Recorder suitable for the
Classic Environment. It seems to be working just fine in terms of
converting my midi files to .
On Sunday, Jul 6, 2003, at 19:07 America/Vancouver, Crystal Premo wrote:
Okay, I downloaded a version of Ultra Recorder suitable for the
Classic Environment. It seems to be working just fine in terms of
converting my midi files to .aiff files that will play on any CD
player. However. Althoug
Okay, I downloaded a version of Ultra Recorder suitable for the Classic
Environment. It seems to be working just fine in terms of converting my
midi files to .aiff files that will play on any CD player. However.
Although I have done this many times before on another computer, the .aiff
file
24 matches
Mail list logo
