Michael Cook wrote:
Ole,
Finale does not offer the possibility of automatically extending
complete secondary beams over rests while keeping the partial
secondary beams (the 32nd stub in your example) short. Here is a
workaround for the case you mention:
- in Document Options/Beams make sure
Robert Patterson wrote:
Hello, Ole. The responses you have gotten so far are correct in that this is major deficiency in Finale. I don't think there is any need for an additional global setting, but a way to shorten individual secondary beams is definitely missing.
But no one has told you the bes
David H. Bailey Wrote:
Keep us posted on what sort of response you get from support.
Ole,
There is unfotunately not a way to adjust the length of secondary beams individually when they are part of a group of beamed notes as shown on your example. I logged in and documented your question as a fea
d.
For example, suppose you have
> -Original Message-
> From: Ole Buck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 09:03 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Finale] Beam over rests
>
> Hi all,
>
> I guess this has been up before, still I ca
You don't say which version you are using, but at least in Fin2004 there
are two checkboxes in Options/DocumentOptions/Beams -- one is Extend
Beams Over Rests and the next is Extend Secondary Beams Over Rests. I
don't remember when that was introduced, but it's there in Fin2004.
There are also
Hi all,
I guess this has been up before, still I can't believe, that it is not
possible to shortend the secondary beam after a rest. The problem comes
when you have Extend Secondary Beams Over Rests as a option in Document
option/Beams, that means that the secondary stub also is extended over
