On Wednesday, Jun 11, 2003, at 19:55 America/Vancouver, Bruce K H Kau
wrote:
I've been of the opinion that chords should be given their own "staff"
(zero lines?) and not be attached as if they were articuations to
another staff. They have their own rhythmic pattern, often independent
of the ot
I've been of the opinion that chords should be given their own "staff"
(zero lines?) and not be attached as if they were articuations to another
staff. They have their own rhythmic pattern, often independent of the other
staves, and they quite often (in what I do) are played/read by separate
instru
At 4:53 PM -0400 6/11/03, Giz Bowe wrote:
It would be nice if Finale would let one attach chords to slash
notation, rather than using a hidden layer for anchors.
We were just discussing the problem of attaching chords when you have
to hide "anchors." Slash notation attachment only solves part o
It would be nice if Finale would let one attach chords to slash notation,
rather than using a hidden layer for anchors.
At 03:15 PM 6/10/03, you wrote:
The problem of pitches used for rhythmic notation also playing back is a
unrelated problem, isn't it? With rhythmic notation, you don't have to
At 3:15 PM -0400 6/10/03, Darcy James Argue wrote:
On Tuesday, June 10, 2003, at 07:43 AM, Christopher BJ Smith wrote:
At 12:10 AM -0400 6/10/03, Darcy James Argue wrote:
On Monday, June 9, 2003, at 11:52 PM, Christopher BJ Smith wrote:
And the present system of attaching chords to notes in anot
On Tuesday, June 10, 2003, at 07:43 AM, Christopher BJ Smith wrote:
At 12:10 AM -0400 6/10/03, Darcy James Argue wrote:
On Monday, June 9, 2003, at 11:52 PM, Christopher BJ Smith wrote:
And the present system of attaching chords to notes in another
layer, means one more pitch to play back, usua
