Sound advice - I've wasted lots of rehearsal time forgetting *that* one!
--- On Mon 05/20, Wiz-of-Oz wrote:
> When you start numbering from the first full measure
> (which seems the most logical, a pickup is just an upbeat to a full
> measure after all, isn't it?)
> just make double sure that
When you start numbering from the first full measure
(which seems the most logical, a pickup is just an upbeat to a full measure after all,
isn't it?)
just make double sure that you didn't forget to input apropriate rests in all silent
voices of the pickup,
so that every extracted part would cl
At 6:41 AM -0400 5/20/02, David H. Bailey wrote:
>
>Here is another corollary to Linda's question: How do you number
>1st and 2nd endings? Do you keep the numbers running right through
>all the measures of the two endings in a linear fashion, or do you
>begin a new region following the 2nd en
On Mon, 20 May 2002 13:51:19 +0100, you wrote:
>Linda Worsley wrote:
>>Anyone out there have the gospel according to whomever? Do I need
>>to call my pickup measure "measure one"?
>
>
>No, please don't. If you tell an orchestra to make a sforzando at the
>beginning of the 2nd measure they will
Linda Worsley wrote:
>Anyone out there have the gospel according to whomever? Do I need
>to call my pickup measure "measure one"?
No, please don't. If you tell an orchestra to make a sforzando at the
beginning of the 2nd measure they will _all_ take that to mean the
2nd full measure. If you
Jón Kristinn Cortez wrote:
> On 20.5.2002 03:43, "Linda Worsley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>You'd think after a hundred years of writing music and copying
>>manuscripts I'd know this, but when I was asked today, and gave "my"
>>answer, it made me think: Is this right??? Help me, o list
On Sun, 19 May 2002 20:43:27 -0700, you wrote:
>You'd think after a hundred years of writing music and copying
>manuscripts I'd know this, but when I was asked today, and gave "my"
>answer, it made me think: Is this right??? Help me, o list gurus.
>
>I generally do not call a pickup measure "m
At 4:14 AM + 5/20/02, Jón Kristinn Cortez wrote:
>On 20.5.2002 03:43, "Linda Worsley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do I need to
> > call my pickup measure "measure one"?
>
>The measure that is full according to the time-signature is the first
>measure. Like you wrote [clip]
>Now I must find
On 20.5.2002 03:43, "Linda Worsley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You'd think after a hundred years of writing music and copying
> manuscripts I'd know this, but when I was asked today, and gave "my"
> answer, it made me think: Is this right??? Help me, o list gurus.
>
> I generally do not call
You'd think after a hundred years of writing music and copying
manuscripts I'd know this, but when I was asked today, and gave "my"
answer, it made me think: Is this right??? Help me, o list gurus.
I generally do not call a pickup measure "measure 1" but start the
numbering at the first full
10 matches
Mail list logo
